home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.lang      Natural languages, communication, etc      297,461 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 295,567 of 297,461   
   Tony Cooper to All   
   Re: To waffle, ‘to waver, to vacillate,    
   25 Apr 24 09:59:05   
   
   XPost: alt.usage.english   
   From: tonycooper214@gmail.com   
      
   On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 07:43:54 +0100, Aidan Kehoe    
   wrote:   
      
   >   
   >Speaking (in sci.lang) of Andy Grove, he uses waffle in the above sense in his   
   >good, well-edited ‘High Output Management.’ In my youth I would only have used   
   >or understood the word in the meaning ‘to ramble on, to say nothing of much   
   >consequence,’ and OED2 documents that the fail-to-make-a-decision sense is   
   >colloquial or non-standard.   
   >   
   >I presume I have misunderstood various Americans over the years in not picking   
   >up on the ‘dither’ meaning. How universal is that meaning over there?   
      
   In my usage, to "waffle" is to provide a reply to a question or demand   
   that does not provide a specific response, acceptance, or denial.   
      
   To include the "ramble" meaning, I would use "waffle-on".  The   
   response is extended, but with additional comments that don't clarify   
   anything.   
      
   A classic waffle used by a parent to child's request or demand is   
   "We'll see".  If the parent adds a number of conditions that may or   
   may not determine if the request or demand will be granted, the parent   
   has "waffled-on".   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca