Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.lang    |    Natural languages, communication, etc    |    297,461 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 295,921 of 297,461    |
|    Hibou to All    |
|    Re: "a Pair of Panties" ?????    |
|    01 Jul 24 06:56:49    |
      XPost: alt.usage.english       From: vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid              Le 01/07/2024 à 04:44, HenHanna a écrit :       >       > A pair of pants, or A pair of trousers       >       > ... ok because each Pair kinda looks       like [2 pipes].       >       > ...but...       > "a Pair of Panties" ?????              There appears to be a class of things that exist only in the plural - a       pair of tweezers, scissors, pliers, sunglasses... trousers, underpants,       knickers, tights... - things that bifurcate or are made up of two bits.       I suppose the briefer garments inherited the plural from longer ones       (though a few minutes' searching yields no support for this; briefs were       apparently in use in Ancient Egypt).              I observe that the kilt is singular - two legs, but only one hole.              > "Keep your pantyhose on." ------- [The Abyss] quote       >       > Clip.Cafe       > https://clip.cafe › the-abyss-1989 › keep-pantyhose-on       > Actors. Virgil 'bud' Brigman by Ed       Harris ·       > 00:12. Starting our descent along the umbilical.              But not pantieshoses.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca