home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.lang      Natural languages, communication, etc      297,461 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 295,927 of 297,461   
   Janet to All   
   Re: "a Pair of Panties" ?????   
   01 Jul 24 13:00:45   
   
   XPost: alt.usage.english   
   From: nobody@home.com   
      
   In article , vpaereru-   
   unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid says...   
   >   
   > Le 01/07/2024 à 04:44, HenHanna a écrit :   
   > >   
   > > A pair of pants,    or    A pair of trousers   
   > >   
   > >                   ... ok because each Pair kinda looks like  [2 pipes].   
   > >   
   > >     ...but...   
   > >               "a Pair of Panties" ?????   
   >   
   > There appears to be a class of things that exist only in the plural - a   
   > pair of tweezers, scissors, pliers, sunglasses... trousers, underpants,   
   > knickers, tights... - things that bifurcate or are made up of two bits.   
      
     Despite which, the bra is singular.   
      
      
   > I suppose the briefer garments inherited the plural from longer ones   
   > (though a few minutes' searching yields no support for this; briefs were   
   > apparently in use in Ancient Egypt).   
   >   
   > I observe that the kilt is singular - two legs, but only one hole.   
      
     Like the skirt, the dress, the petticoat.   
      
     It's a mystery why men don't wear a petticoat under   
   those itchy wool kilts.   
      
     Janet   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca