XPost: alt.usage.english   
   From: nobody@home.com   
      
   In article <5b7a073093charles@candehope.me.uk>,   
   charles@candehope.me.uk says...   
   > Subject: Re: "a Pair of Panties" ?????   
   > From: charles    
   > Newsgroups: sci.lang, alt.usage.english   
   >   
   > In article ,   
   >    Peter Moylan  wrote:   
   > > On 02/07/24 06:47, Sn!pe wrote:   
   > > > Hibou  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > >> Le 01/07/2024 à 13:00, Janet a écrit :   
   > > >>> In article , vpaereru-   
   > > >>> unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid says...   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>> I observe that the kilt is singular - two legs, but only one   
   > > >>>> hole.   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>> Like the skirt, the dress, the petticoat.   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>> It's a mystery why men don't wear a petticoat under those itchy   
   > > >>> wool kilts.   
   > > >>   
   > > >> In truth, I don't know what Scotsmen wear under their kilts, and I   
   > > >> shrink from enquiring.   
   >   
   > > Kilts strike me as particularly unsuited to the Scottish climate. A cold   
   > > wind up the kilt would make anyone shrink.   
   >   
   > It's a 20th Century falacy that no underwear is worn under a kilt. It stems   
   > from the War Office, in WW1, gforgetting to put underpants on their uniform   
   > list. Think about hygene.   
   >   
      
      Think about "going Commando"   
      
       Janet.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)