XPost: alt.usage.english   
   From: tonycooper214@gmail.com   
      
   On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 23:27:30 -0000 (UTC), Anonymous   
    wrote:   
      
   >Tony Cooper  wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 13:22:59 -0400, Rich Ulrich   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:02:15 -0400, Tony Cooper   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:39:09 -0700, HenHanna    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I have thousands of images from .jpgs to .pngs on my computer.  I use   
   >>>>>>>> the (free) FastStone Photo Viewer.  It's not only a great image   
   >>>>>>>> viewer, but offers many other options from selecting by tagged images   
   >>>>>>>> to bulk re-naming.  It's set as my default viewer.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> bulk re-naming ---- i've never wanted to do this.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's up to your own system.  Images come out of the camera with   
   >>>> descriptors determined by the camera.  In my case, my Nikon names an   
   >>>> image something like _DNC4911.dng.  I re-name the image   
   >>>> 2024-07-26-1.dng or whatever the date is.   The image is then adjusted   
   >>>> in Adobe Lightroom or Photoshop and saved or exported as a .tif, .psd,   
   >>>> .png, or .jpg depending on the intended use.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If I link to one of my images, the file name in that format tells you   
   >>>> when that image was taken.  Associating the date-taken with the image   
   >>>> by making it the file name has many advantages.   
   >>>   
   >>> I found the date-as-name extremely useful when I set about   
   >>> organizing the files I obtained when I had 10,000 slides scanned.   
   >>> They had been shot by my dad, featuring celebrations, vacations   
   >>> (people and viewss) and special events. This was about 30 years   
   >>> after he died, after my mom moved and was sorting things out,   
   >>> so discoloration was the problem that was more time-consuming   
   >>> than figuring the actual, original dates.   
   >>   
   >> I have been an avid photographer since high school.  Back when I   
   >> started to put all my photographs on the computer using Adobe's   
   >> Lightroom, the problem was dating all those slides and prints I had.   
   >>   
   >> It was like detective work.  If I could find a photograph where I   
   >> could pinpoint the date, I'd look for others where the clothing or   
   >> scene was the same.  By "pinpoint", I mean at least knowing the year.   
   >>   
   >> I've become proficient in Adobe Photoshop, so I can pretty closely   
   >> restore the original colors to faded scanned prints, refresh black and   
   >> white prints,  and restore damaged prints.   Some stored prints became   
   >> stuck together and damaged when pulled apart.   
   >   
   >Scanning negatives will give you much more detail than you ever saw in   
   >prints. But it’s a world unto itself and unfortunately the best negative   
   >scanners (Nikon Coolscan) are no longer made, even (for many years now).   
   >   
   I did not scan my slides.  I bought a used Nikon Coolscan and later   
   sold it for the same price I paid for it.   
      
      
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)