home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.lang      Natural languages, communication, etc      297,461 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 296,558 of 297,461   
   Sam Plusnet to Aidan Kehoe   
   Re: OT: Converting miles/km   
   22 Sep 24 21:59:40   
   
   XPost: alt.usage.english   
   From: not@home.com   
      
   On 22/09/2024 07:59, Aidan Kehoe wrote:   
   >   
   >   Ar an dara lá is fiche de mí Méan Fómhair, scríobh Hibou:   
   >   
   >   > Le 21/09/2024 à 16:10, Aidan Kehoe a écrit :   
   >   > >>> Hibou hat am 21.09.2024 um 09:20 geschrieben:   
   >   > >>>>   
   >   > >>>> Our recent hire cars have displayed the speed limit, as read from   
   limit   
   >   > >>>> signs via their cameras. It is often wrong, displaying a recent   
   speed   
   >   > >>>> limit, not the current one - unsurprisingly, since in France there   
   are a   
   >   > >>>> variety of signs that set the speed (a crossed-out place name, for   
   >   > >>>> instance), the camera lens may be dirty, a lorry may mask a sign,   
   and so   
   >   > >>>> on.   
   >   > >>>>   
   >   > >>>> Apparently, the crazy EU has made this flawed system the basis for   
   >   > >>>> mandatory speed limiters (and the crazy UK has followed suit). If   
   you   
   >   > >>>> run into someone stuck at 30 kph on a 130 kph autoroute, that's   
   probably   
   >   > >>>> the reason.   
   >   > >   
   >   > > A mandatory warning is part of the law, but actual restriction is not,   
   >   >   
   >   > Do you have a source for that, a link?   
   >   
   > https://etsc.eu/intelligent-speed-assistance-isa/   
   >   
   > “The European Union agreed in 2019 to make an overridable version of   
   > [intelligent speed assistance], along with a number of other vehicle safety   
   > measures, mandatory on new models of car sold in the EU from July 2022 and on   
   > all new cars sold from July 2024.”   
   >   
   >   > > so should you be in those occasional situations where breaking the   
   speed   
   >   > > limit is safer than following it, you can (usually, depending on your   
   >   > > manufacturer) just keep the foot on the accelerator despite the alarm.   
   >   >   
   >   > I think such situations are routine, not occasional.   
   >   >   
   >   > >>>> "However, our experience of such systems suggests they can get it   
   wrong.   
   >   > >>>> In one instance, a car's traffic sign recognition system picked up a   
   >   > >>>> 30mph sign on a turning off a dual carriage and dramatically slowed   
   >   > >>>> down, despite the fact the car was actually travelling along the   
   outside   
   >   > >>>> lane" -   
   >   > >>>>    
   >   > >>>>   
   >   > >>>> God preserve us from government!   
   >   > >   
   >   > > Apart from things like seatbelt laws, high taxes on tobacco, enforced   
   >   > > rules on food safety, regulation of medication? Or are you completely   
   fine   
   >   > > with easily avoidable death and major disability, shorter and   
   >   > > worse-quality lives, mass poisonings, more mass poisonings? The middle   
   >   > > option saves on taxes given if you die at 63 from lung cancer you   
   won’t   
   >   > > draw much in the way of state pension, so there is a financial but not   
   >   > > humanitarian argument for it. There’s no argument for the rest.   
   >   >   
   >   > I think you've missed my point, which was that the system for determining   
   >   > the speed limit is thoroughly unreliable, and not a suitable basis for   
   >   > restrictors, or even alarms sounding in drivers' ears.   
   >   
   > Ah, maybe I have. My 2019 Toyota Corolla has a system that reads the   
   > speed-limit signs, displays the currently active speed limit, and changes the   
   > usual black-numbers-on-a-white-background display to   
   > white-numbers-on-a-red-background if I exceed that speed. It very   
   occasionally   
   > gets things wrong but is usually reliable, even on those parts of the island   
   > afflicted by speed limits in MPH. So my reading of things is from my own   
   > relevant experience rather than a journalist driving clicks.   
      
   This will be more of a problem for some, depending upon where you live.   
      
   My car uses a combination of satnav map data which includes the set   
   speed limit on each road, plus the output of the camera which (attempts   
   to) read speed limit signs.   
      
   Since the default speed limit in Wales was reduced to 20mph, the speed   
   limit displayed by my car has been wrong more often than it is   
   correct[1] - and not just reading "30" when it ought to be "20".   
      
   At the moment that is a nuisance.   
   If that same incorrect data is to be used in the way described in this   
   thread, it becomes far more than a nuisance.   
      
   [1] In a 8 mile radius around my home, I am not exaggerating when I say   
   "more often wrong that correct". - and yes the satnav's mapping data has   
   been updated twice in the year since the limit was changed.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca