Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.lang    |    Natural languages, communication, etc    |    297,461 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 297,192 of 297,461    |
|    Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: A new category of thought    |
|    29 Nov 25 19:50:26    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math       From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com              On 11/29/2025 5:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       > On 11/29/25 7:35 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:       >> On 11/29/2025 4:17 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>> On 11/29/25 6:53 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:       >>>> On 11/29/2025 1:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>> [...]       >>>>> Godel proved that such a system can't exist if it can represent the       >>>>> properties of the Natural Number.       >>>       >>> So, where do you have a "provability operator" that will tell you if       >>> a given theory is in fact provable.       >>       >> Nope. That is not possible. Think of the integer 0. I can prove that       >> it has, wrt n-ary, n positive children, and n negative children. For       >> example, 2-ary, two (+) and two (-). Say n is a natural number:       >       > And that was the pre-condition Olcott made of his logic system, that it       > have a provability operator.       [...]              PO is a nut bar with extra nuts?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca