Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.lang    |    Natural languages, communication, etc    |    297,461 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 297,358 of 297,461    |
|    Jeff Barnett to JTEM    |
|    Re: Did Homo Erectus Have a (Vocal) Lang    |
|    18 Jan 26 12:55:24    |
      XPost: sci.anthropology.paleo       From: jbb@notatt.com              On 1/18/2026 12:35 PM, JTEM wrote:       > On 1/18/26 4:29 AM, Jeff Barnett wrote:       >       >> So the fact that scientific journals change their ideas and acceptable       >> assumptions over       >       > Journals don't have ideas.       >       > They're not people. Only people have ideas.       >       > I'm going to stop here, at the very first critical error, for       > reason that should be obvious to anyone familiar with the       > definition of "Critical."       >       > I'm just going to reiterate:       >       > #1. Academia imposes a need -- not a desire but a need -- to be       > published REGARDLESS of work, of findings.       >       > #2. To meet their requirements, and unable to achieve constant       > breakthroughs/discoveries, academics here rehash old stuff.       >       > #3. This nonsense about language is a very obvious example.       Journals do, indeed "have opinions" and ideas. Different journals in       similar ideas pursue and specialize in articles about different aspects       and pursuits. I'm curious: Have you published much? If so, why don't you       relate the experiences that went into the formulations of your opinions       about the scientific publication process. If you have lived outside the       process, from where did you get your ideas?              And one more question: Do you know enough about evolutionary science,       linguistics, and anthropology to substantiate your claims about a       possibility in the early development of language or even sub-language       skills? If so, share with us the source of that knowledge: school,       independent in-depth study, research, part of a community pursuing       knowledge in the area, some other path?? By the way, what specific facts       in the article you criticize can you point out as wrong and why? Have       you read the article, read a review of it (other than in Usenet), or       know anyone who has?       --       Jeff Barnett              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca