home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.logic      Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa      262,912 messages   

   262912   

   Mild Shock to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Lion_and_Unicorn:_H=c3=a5kan_K   

   23 Feb 26 20:54:55   

   1k   

   262911   

   Mikko to polcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   20 Feb 26 11:46:27   

   2k   

   262910   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   19 Feb 26 21:34:02   

   2k   

   262909   

   polcott to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   19 Feb 26 05:47:10   

   2k   

   262908   

   Mikko to polcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   19 Feb 26 12:06:19   

   1k   

   262907   

   polcott to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   18 Feb 26 13:48:20   

   1k   

   262906   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   18 Feb 26 00:35:23   

   2k   

   262905   

   Mikko to polcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   18 Feb 26 11:10:54   

   1k   

   262904   

   polcott to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   17 Feb 26 06:59:17   

   1k   

   262903   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   17 Feb 26 11:03:51   

   6k   

   262902   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   17 Feb 26 11:11:09   

   6k   

   262901   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   17 Feb 26 11:16:59   

   1k   

   262900   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   16 Feb 26 22:59:41   

   2k   

   262899   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   16 Feb 26 11:03:00   

   5k   

   262898   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   16 Feb 26 07:47:07   

   5k   

   262897   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   16 Feb 26 13:31:12   

   5,604b   

   262896   

   Mikko to polcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   16 Feb 26 13:25:57   

   5k   

   262895   

   polcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   15 Feb 26 13:39:01   

   2k   

   262894   

   Alan Mackenzie to polcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   15 Feb 26 19:54:36   

   2k   

   262893   

   polcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   15 Feb 26 13:06:25   

   5k   

   262892   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   15 Feb 26 18:15:10   

   5k   

   262891   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   15 Feb 26 18:08:55   

   5,448b   

   262890   

   Alan Mackenzie to tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.m   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   15 Feb 26 19:27:48   

   1k   

   262889   

   Mikko to polcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   15 Feb 26 11:18:08   

   4k   

   262888   

   polcott to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   15 Feb 26 07:02:19   

   5k   

   262887   

   Mikko to polcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   15 Feb 26 11:19:34   

   4k   

   262886   

   polcott to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   14 Feb 26 14:59:46   

   5k   

   262885   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   14 Feb 26 11:14:03   

   4k   

   262884   

   polcott to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   14 Feb 26 09:31:48   

   4k   

   262883   

   Mild Shock to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?ANN:_CulotteTalk=e2=84=a2_=e2=   

   13 Feb 26 14:56:34   

   4,475b   

   262882   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   13 Feb 26 10:30:30   

   3k   

   262881   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   13 Feb 26 07:32:25   

   4k   

   262880   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa   

   12 Feb 26 19:04:16   

   1k   

   262879   

   olcott to All   

   Making all knowledge expressed in langua   

   12 Feb 26 19:32:26   

   2k   

   262878   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa   

   12 Feb 26 14:26:21   

   1k   

   262877   

   Tristan Wibberley to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: on ignoring the undecidable   

   12 Feb 26 17:23:06   

   3k   

   262876   

   Alan Mackenzie to tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.m   

   Re: on ignoring the undecidable   

   12 Feb 26 20:02:49   

   3k   

   262875   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa   

   12 Feb 26 19:00:31   

   1k   

   262874   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: on ignoring the undecidable --- is t   

   12 Feb 26 11:41:55   

   4k   

   262873   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   12 Feb 26 10:34:23   

   6k   

   262872   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   12 Feb 26 09:48:40   

   4k   

   262871   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   12 Feb 26 11:01:14   

   1k   

   262870   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa   

   12 Feb 26 10:06:11   

   6k   

   262869   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   12 Feb 26 10:11:51   

   3k   

   262868   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   12 Feb 26 10:25:27   

   3k   

   262867   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa   

   11 Feb 26 19:09:42   

   3k   

   262866   

   olcott to All   

   Making all knowledge expressed in langua   

   11 Feb 26 20:17:20   

   3k   

   262865   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa   

   11 Feb 26 17:41:58   

   2k   

   262864   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa   

   11 Feb 26 15:27:45   

   2k   

   262863   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa   

   11 Feb 26 07:08:41   

   3k   

   262862   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   11 Feb 26 06:38:04   

   3k   

   262861   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la   

   11 Feb 26 12:51:27   

   2k   

   262860   

   olcott to All   

   Making the body of knowledge computable   

   10 Feb 26 22:59:24   

   1,995b   

   262859   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Making all knowledge expressed in langua   

   10 Feb 26 07:37:02   

   2k   

   262858   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: on ignoring the undecidable   

   10 Feb 26 11:06:02   

   2k   

   262857   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: on ignoring the undecidable   

   10 Feb 26 11:00:32   

   1,928b   

   262856   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: on ignoring the undecidable   

   09 Feb 26 09:36:55   

   2k   

   262855   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: on ignoring the undecidable --- proo   

   09 Feb 26 19:37:21   

   1k   

   262854   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: on ignoring the undecidable --- PLO   

   09 Feb 26 11:42:05   

   2k   

   262853   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: on ignoring the undecidable   

   09 Feb 26 16:57:23   

   1k   

   262852   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: on ignoring the undecidable   

   09 Feb 26 16:43:33   

   1k   

   262851   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   09 Feb 26 08:02:39   

   1k   

   262850   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   08 Feb 26 05:33:57   

   1k   

   262849   

   user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid to All   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   08 Feb 26 11:34:10   

   1k   

   262848   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej   

   08 Feb 26 11:06:04   

   2k   

   262847   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   07 Feb 26 23:07:03   

   4k   

   262846   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   07 Feb 26 22:59:57   

   4,107b   

   262845   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   08 Feb 26 02:59:37   

   4,107b   

   262844   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   08 Feb 26 02:49:30   

   1k   

   262843   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   07 Feb 26 19:10:58   

   3k   

   262842   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   08 Feb 26 02:58:16   

   1k   

   262841   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   08 Feb 26 02:47:49   

   1k   

   262840   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   07 Feb 26 10:46:53   

   3k   

   262839   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: on ignoring the undecidable   

   07 Feb 26 10:43:15   

   1k   

   262838   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej   

   07 Feb 26 09:08:56   

   2k   

   262837   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   07 Feb 26 09:10:00   

   2k   

   262836   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   07 Feb 26 08:22:36   

   2k   

   262835   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   07 Feb 26 07:10:28   

   1k   

   262834   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej   

   07 Feb 26 12:15:56   

   1k   

   262833   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej   

   07 Feb 26 07:08:51   

   2k   

   262832   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   07 Feb 26 12:25:05   

   1,819b   

   262831   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   07 Feb 26 11:50:13   

   1,819b   

   262830   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej   

   06 Feb 26 09:32:37   

   1k   

   262829   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   06 Feb 26 22:35:07   

   6k   

   262828   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   06 Feb 26 20:16:25   

   6k   

   262827   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   06 Feb 26 19:13:50   

   6k   

   262826   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   06 Feb 26 18:10:51   

   5k   

   262825   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   06 Feb 26 14:00:34   

   3k   

   262824   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   06 Feb 26 09:30:53   

   1k   

   262823   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   06 Feb 26 08:58:19   

   6k   

   262822   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   06 Feb 26 10:21:15   

   7k   

   262821   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 23:26:38   

   6k   

   262820   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej   

   06 Feb 26 11:15:10   

   1k   

   262819   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   06 Feb 26 11:01:09   

   1,150b   

   262818   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 23:42:58   

   7k   

   262817   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 21:22:05   

   7k   

   262816   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 23:01:43   

   6k   

   262815   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 20:36:36   

   7k   

   262814   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 22:31:39   

   6k   

   262813   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 20:15:23   

   7k   

   262812   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 22:08:25   

   6k   

   262811   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 19:23:50   

   7k   

   262810   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 21:11:14   

   6k   

   262809   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 18:49:58   

   7k   

   262808   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P   

   05 Feb 26 18:44:54   

   2k   

   262807   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej   

   05 Feb 26 12:45:28   

   2,476b   

   262806   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 14:20:17   

   6k   

   262805   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   05 Feb 26 10:06:04   

   6k   

   262804   

   olcott to All   

   Changing the foundational basis to Proof   

   05 Feb 26 10:55:56   

   2k   

   262803   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej   

   05 Feb 26 05:28:30   

   1k   

   262802   

   Mild Shock to olcott   

   Corr.: The Perfectly Dead Horse (Re: 202   

   05 Feb 26 09:08:00   

   2k   

   262801   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   04 Feb 26 21:04:43   

   5k   

   262800   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   04 Feb 26 18:52:52   

   5k   

   262799   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   04 Feb 26 20:50:26   

   5k   

   262798   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   04 Feb 26 18:42:56   

   4k   

   262797   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   04 Feb 26 18:00:10   

   4k   

   262796   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mild Shock   

   Re: 2026 the Year Prolog **plonked** Its   

   04 Feb 26 23:03:11   

   1k   

   262795   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: 2026 the Year Prolog **plonked** Its   

   04 Feb 26 17:25:40   

   1,099b   

   262794   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   04 Feb 26 15:43:54   

   4k   

   262793   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   04 Feb 26 14:19:41   

   3k   

   262792   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   04 Feb 26 16:27:27   

   3k   

   262791   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   04 Feb 26 16:15:42   

   3k   

   262790   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Halting Problem and Proof Theoretic    

   04 Feb 26 07:29:12   

   2,768b   

   262789   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   04 Feb 26 12:41:30   

   2k   

   262788   

   Mild Shock to All   

   2026 the Year Prolog **plonked** Itself    

   04 Feb 26 02:21:40   

   2,023b   

   262787   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Halting Problem and Proof Theoretic    

   02 Feb 26 23:41:41   

   2k   

   262786   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   02 Feb 26 09:39:34   

   5k   

   262785   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Halting Problem and Proof Theoretic    

   02 Feb 26 07:49:21   

   2k   

   262784   

   olcott to All   

   Halting Problem and Proof Theoretic Sema   

   01 Feb 26 21:32:51   

   2k   

   262783   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   01 Feb 26 18:28:21   

   2k   

   262782   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   01 Feb 26 18:00:12   

   2k   

   262781   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   01 Feb 26 17:45:12   

   1k   

   262780   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   01 Feb 26 14:12:39   

   2k   

   262779   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   01 Feb 26 20:04:09   

   2k   

   262778   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   01 Feb 26 12:36:13   

   3k   

   262777   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   01 Feb 26 13:35:54   

   2k   

   262776   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   01 Feb 26 11:35:46   

   2k   

   262775   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   01 Feb 26 09:18:03   

   2,455b   

   262774   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   01 Feb 26 09:18:03   

   7k   

   262773   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   01 Feb 26 07:33:39   

   3k   

   262772   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   NVMe's are worse than a human brain (Re:   

   01 Feb 26 14:01:13   

   2k   

   262771   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   01 Feb 26 07:33:42   

   3k   

   262770   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   01 Feb 26 12:28:05   

   6k   

   262769   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt   

   01 Feb 26 07:11:22   

   2k   

   262768   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   01 Feb 26 12:17:39   

   4k   

   262767   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   31 Jan 26 09:23:51   

   6k   

   262766   

   olcott to All   

   Proof theoretic semantics based halt pro   

   31 Jan 26 11:49:45   

   1k   

   262765   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   30 Jan 26 23:39:33   

   2k   

   262764   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   30 Jan 26 20:10:47   

   1k   

   262763   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   31 Jan 26 09:26:43   

   4k   

   262762   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   31 Jan 26 10:56:22   

   4k   

   262761   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   31 Jan 26 01:47:22   

   1k   

   262760   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   31 Jan 26 10:41:30   

   5k   

   262759   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   30 Jan 26 08:35:02   

   4k   

   262758   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   30 Jan 26 11:34:10   

   4k   

   262757   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   29 Jan 26 07:57:29   

   4k   

   262756   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   29 Jan 26 11:12:05   

   3k   

   262755   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   29 Jan 26 04:39:08   

   1k   

   262754   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   28 Jan 26 20:10:34   

   1,057b   

   262753   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   28 Jan 26 12:17:32   

   2k   

   262752   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   28 Jan 26 12:08:43   

   2k   

   262751   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   28 Jan 26 23:59:00   

   2,257b   

   262750   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   28 Jan 26 11:40:26   

   2k   

   262749   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   28 Jan 26 07:49:31   

   4k   

   262748   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   28 Jan 26 16:34:29   

   2k   

   262747   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   28 Jan 26 11:54:17   

   3k   

   262746   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   28 Jan 26 16:21:42   

   2k   

   262745   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   28 Jan 26 11:45:09   

   3k   

   262744   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   27 Jan 26 09:32:42   

   3k   

   262743   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   27 Jan 26 08:48:53   

   2k   

   262742   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   27 Jan 26 10:17:08   

   2k   

   262741   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   27 Jan 26 09:29:23   

   4k   

   262740   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   27 Jan 26 10:05:05   

   2k   

   262739   

   Mikko to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   27 Jan 26 10:15:32   

   3k   

   262738   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   26 Jan 26 11:28:05   

   3k   

   262737   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   26 Jan 26 10:58:21   

   3k   

   262736   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   26 Jan 26 09:22:01   

   2k   

   262735   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   26 Jan 26 14:55:14   

   2k   

   262734   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 20:31:23   

   5k   

   262733   

   dart200 to Richard Damon   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   25 Jan 26 13:07:35   

   7k   

   262732   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 14:07:41   

   4k   

   262731   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 14:09:17   

   6k   

   262730   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 13:10:56   

   6k   

   262729   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 14:21:47   

   3k   

   262728   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 13:05:57   

   2k   

   262727   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 13:09:54   

   5k   

   262726   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 12:33:30   

   5k   

   262725   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 07:30:24   

   2k   

   262724   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 07:24:09   

   4k   

   262723   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 13:24:54   

   1k   

   262722   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   25 Jan 26 13:19:19   

   3k   

   262721   

   dart200 to Richard Damon   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   24 Jan 26 19:03:43   

   6k   

   262720   

   dart200 to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   24 Jan 26 18:28:58   

   3k   

   262719   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   25 Jan 26 13:12:01   

   2k   

   262718   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   24 Jan 26 19:44:52   

   3k   

   262717   

   dart200 to Richard Damon   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   24 Jan 26 14:28:28   

   4k   

   262716   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   24 Jan 26 16:31:31   

   2k   

   262715   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   24 Jan 26 14:38:28   

   2k   

   262714   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti   

   24 Jan 26 13:28:25   

   1k   

   262713   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   24 Jan 26 13:25:42   

   1k   

   262712   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti   

   24 Jan 26 13:26:59   

   1k   

   262711   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   24 Jan 26 11:54:38   

   6k   

   262710   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti   

   24 Jan 26 11:56:42   

   1k   

   262709   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti   

   24 Jan 26 12:20:04   

   1,190b   

   262708   

   Bonita Montero to All   

   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti   

   24 Jan 26 18:17:55   

   1,190b   

   262707   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   24 Jan 26 09:44:50   

   7k   

   262706   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   24 Jan 26 09:48:04   

   1k   

   262705   

   dart200 to Richard Damon   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   24 Jan 26 08:49:08   

   2k   

   262704   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   24 Jan 26 09:39:00   

   2,354b   

   262703   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   24 Jan 26 08:21:09   

   5k   

   262702   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   24 Jan 26 08:18:34   

   1k   

   262701   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   24 Jan 26 08:01:52   

   3k   

   262700   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   24 Jan 26 10:42:23   

   1k   

   262699   

   dart200 to Mikko   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   24 Jan 26 01:21:45   

   1k   

   262698   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   24 Jan 26 10:23:57   

   1,494b   

   262697   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   24 Jan 26 10:20:59   

   3k   

   262696   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   23 Jan 26 20:56:58   

   4k   

   262695   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   23 Jan 26 19:51:50   

   3k   

   262694   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   23 Jan 26 21:05:22   

   5k   

   262693   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   23 Jan 26 18:01:21   

   2k   

   262692   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   23 Jan 26 17:50:24   

   2k   

   262691   

   olcott to All   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   23 Jan 26 11:24:04   

   2k   

   262690   

   olcott to All   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   23 Jan 26 11:14:13   

   2k   

   262689   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   23 Jan 26 04:22:51   

   3k   

   262688   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   23 Jan 26 11:31:29   

   2,955b   

   262687   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   23 Jan 26 08:29:32   

   1k   

   262686   

   olcott to All   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   23 Jan 26 04:19:38   

   1k   

   262685   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   23 Jan 26 11:13:37   

   2k   

   262684   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   23 Jan 26 04:43:32   

   2k   

   262683   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   22 Jan 26 21:21:09   

   1k   

   262682   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   22 Jan 26 22:18:23   

   6k   

   262681   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   22 Jan 26 21:51:25   

   6k   

   262680   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   22 Jan 26 19:38:40   

   2k   

   262679   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   23 Jan 26 01:15:59   

   2k   

   262678   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   22 Jan 26 19:05:39   

   3k   

   262677   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   22 Jan 26 18:49:05   

   4k   

   262676   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   22 Jan 26 18:33:12   

   5k   

   262675   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   22 Jan 26 18:29:57   

   2k   

   262674   

   Tristan Wibberley to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   23 Jan 26 00:23:32   

   2k   

   262673   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti   

   22 Jan 26 18:15:18   

   1,640b   

   262672   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti   

   22 Jan 26 19:09:10   

   2k   

   262671   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   22 Jan 26 19:13:05   

   7k   

   262670   

   olcott to All   

   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil   

   22 Jan 26 17:58:46   

   6,700b   

   262669   

   olcott to All   

   Well-founded proof theoretic semantics e   

   22 Jan 26 11:32:36   

   6,700b   

   262668   

   olcott to All   

   Well-founded proof theoretic semantics e   

   22 Jan 26 11:40:31   

   6,700b   

   262667   

   olcott to All   

   Well-founded proof theoretic semantics e   

   22 Jan 26 11:25:34   

   6,700b   

   262666   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   22 Jan 26 10:47:58   

   6,700b   

   262665   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   22 Jan 26 10:40:20   

   3k   

   262664   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   22 Jan 26 10:43:24   

   6k   

   262663   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   22 Jan 26 12:40:35   

   1k   

   262662   

   olcott to Python   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   21 Jan 26 23:18:20   

   5k   

   262661   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   22 Jan 26 10:21:15   

   7k   

   262660   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   22 Jan 26 10:30:12   

   1k   

   262659   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   21 Jan 26 22:37:53   

   6k   

   262658   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   21 Jan 26 21:53:59   

   4k   

   262657   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   Magic square of squares [Richard Guy] (R   

   22 Jan 26 01:41:30   

   2k   

   262656   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   21 Jan 26 21:24:33   

   2k   

   262655   

   Moebius to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   22 Jan 26 02:23:06   

   2,518b   

   262654   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   21 Jan 26 20:56:23   

   1k   

   262653   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   21 Jan 26 09:45:37   

   4k   

   262652   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   21 Jan 26 20:29:41   

   2k   

   262651   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   21 Jan 26 14:14:47   

   1k   

   262650   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   21 Jan 26 09:14:42   

   6k   

   262649   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   21 Jan 26 19:02:42   

   1k   

   262648   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   21 Jan 26 18:55:51   

   1k   

   262647   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   21 Jan 26 09:22:54   

   7k   

   262646   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   21 Jan 26 13:46:02   

   1k   

   262645   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   21 Jan 26 11:03:35   

   1,456b   

   262644   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   21 Jan 26 11:03:35   

   7k   

   262643   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   21 Jan 26 07:38:37   

   4k   

   262642   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   21 Jan 26 07:35:58   

   3k   

   262641   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   20 Jan 26 22:49:21   

   4k   

   262640   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   20 Jan 26 22:54:58   

   3k   

   262639   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   20 Jan 26 17:33:57   

   2k   

   262638   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   20 Jan 26 23:08:00   

   2k   

   262637   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   20 Jan 26 15:39:48   

   3k   

   262636   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: "true on the basis of meaning expres   

   20 Jan 26 13:21:47   

   4k   

   262635   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   20 Jan 26 15:23:08   

   2k   

   262634   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   20 Jan 26 12:35:45   

   2,361b   

   262633   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   20 Jan 26 12:35:45   

   6k   

   262632   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   20 Jan 26 14:00:56   

   5k   

   262631   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   20 Jan 26 11:58:50   

   6k   

   262630   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   20 Jan 26 10:50:41   

   6k   

   262629   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst   

   20 Jan 26 12:13:19   

   4k   

   262628   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   20 Jan 26 11:48:41   

   3,753b   

   262627   

   olcott to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   19 Jan 26 20:39:39   

   2k   

   262626   

   Mild Shock to All   

   Die Geschichte von Ludwig XIV [AI is not   

   19 Jan 26 23:03:57   

   2,301b   

   262625   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: "true on the basis of meaning expres   

   19 Jan 26 14:32:05   

   2k   

   262624   

   olcott to olcott   

   "true on the basis of meaning expressed    

   19 Jan 26 14:39:25   

   2k   

   262623   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   19 Jan 26 13:20:39   

   2k   

   262622   

   olcott to All   

   Proof of original authorship   

   19 Jan 26 10:49:24   

   2,494b   

   262621   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   19 Jan 26 09:03:39   

   6k   

   262620   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   19 Jan 26 15:00:39   

   1k   

   262619   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   19 Jan 26 08:43:01   

   6k   

   262618   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   19 Jan 26 13:58:24   

   2k   

   262617   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   19 Jan 26 06:49:22   

   5k   

   262616   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   19 Jan 26 10:19:34   

   7k   

   262615   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: What formal logical systems resolve    

   19 Jan 26 10:24:03   

   1k   

   262614   

   Mikko to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   19 Jan 26 10:35:15   

   3k   

   262613   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   18 Jan 26 22:56:51   

   3k   

   262612   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   18 Jan 26 22:28:04   

   2k   

   262611   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   18 Jan 26 21:17:33   

   6k   

   262610   

   olcott to Python   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   18 Jan 26 21:19:54   

   1k   

   262609   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   18 Jan 26 17:41:21   

   6k   

   262608   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   18 Jan 26 15:49:01   

   6k   

   262607   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   18 Jan 26 12:38:52   

   6k   

   262606   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: What formal logical systems resolve    

   18 Jan 26 07:45:37   

   5k   

   262605   

   olcott to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   18 Jan 26 06:53:52   

   4k   

   262604   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   18 Jan 26 12:44:57   

   3,754b   

   262603   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   18 Jan 26 07:28:45   

   6k   

   262602   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   18 Jan 26 12:38:13   

   1k   

   262601   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Glossary_building_=28Was=3A_Re   

   18 Jan 26 11:53:14   

   3k   

   262600   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   18 Jan 26 14:06:39   

   2,593b   

   262599   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: What formal logical systems resolve    

   18 Jan 26 13:54:13   

   4k   

   262598   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   18 Jan 26 13:27:00   

   5k   

   262597   

   Mikko to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   18 Jan 26 13:18:01   

   2k   

   262596   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   18 Jan 26 11:51:43   

   1k   

   262595   

   Mikko to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   18 Jan 26 12:09:00   

   1k   

   262594   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   17 Jan 26 22:38:28   

   6k   

   262593   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   17 Jan 26 21:59:25   

   6k   

   262592   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   17 Jan 26 19:59:54   

   5k   

   262591   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   17 Jan 26 19:30:50   

   5k   

   262590   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   17 Jan 26 18:49:06   

   3k   

   262589   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev   

   17 Jan 26 16:50:49   

   3k   

   262588   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   17 Jan 26 22:21:51   

   3,238b   

   262587   

   olcott to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_never_act   

   17 Jan 26 15:08:22   

   2k   

   262586   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   17 Jan 26 10:11:19   

   7k   

   262585   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   17 Jan 26 10:01:20   

   7k   

   262584   

   olcott to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   17 Jan 26 09:54:03   

   2k   

   262583   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   17 Jan 26 08:47:10   

   4k   

   262582   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   17 Jan 26 07:03:50   

   7k   

   262581   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   17 Jan 26 12:25:29   

   7k   

   262580   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   17 Jan 26 10:55:11   

   1k   

   262579   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Schematic systems   

   17 Jan 26 12:11:10   

   1,041b   

   262578   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   17 Jan 26 12:00:31   

   1,041b   

   262577   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   17 Jan 26 11:53:21   

   4k   

   262576   

   Mikko to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   17 Jan 26 11:46:33   

   2k   

   262575   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   17 Jan 26 11:22:40   

   2k   

   262574   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   16 Jan 26 21:44:28   

   6k   

   262573   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   16 Jan 26 21:42:30   

   6k   

   262572   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   16 Jan 26 19:23:29   

   6k   

   262571   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   16 Jan 26 19:27:55   

   6,646b   

   262570   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   16 Jan 26 19:27:55   

   6k   

   262569   

   olcott to All   

   The essence of all Computation generical   

   16 Jan 26 16:58:20   

   4k   

   262568   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   16 Jan 26 16:09:54   

   7k   

   262567   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   16 Jan 26 14:51:14   

   6k   

   262566   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   16 Jan 26 14:24:29   

   4k   

   262565   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat   

   16 Jan 26 13:16:00   

   4k   

   262564   

   user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=B6   

   16 Jan 26 18:12:37   

   4k   

   262563   

   olcott to athel.cb@gmail.com   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   16 Jan 26 12:21:26   

   5k   

   262562   

   olcott to All   

   Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Patholo   

   16 Jan 26 11:47:53   

   1k   

   262561   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   16 Jan 26 08:12:56   

   6k   

   262560   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   16 Jan 26 09:12:11   

   6k   

   262559   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   16 Jan 26 09:38:16   

   4k   

   262558   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   16 Jan 26 11:17:14   

   7k   

   262557   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   16 Jan 26 11:32:39   

   3k   

   262556   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   16 Jan 26 11:21:05   

   3,366b   

   262555   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 22:03:52   

   7k   

   262554   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Systems such as PA with proof-theore   

   15 Jan 26 21:59:31   

   2k   

   262553   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   15 Jan 26 22:23:54   

   2k   

   262552   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   15 Jan 26 22:20:25   

   3k   

   262551   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Systems such as PA with proof-theoretic    

   15 Jan 26 18:24:12   

   2,874b   

   262550   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Schematic systems   

   15 Jan 26 20:06:50   

   2,874b   

   262549   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Systems such as PA with proof-theore   

   15 Jan 26 19:18:36   

   1k   

   262548   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 17:38:26   

   7k   

   262547   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Systems such as PA with proof-theore   

   16 Jan 26 00:47:20   

   1k   

   262546   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: What formal logical systems resolve    

   15 Jan 26 17:40:31   

   4k   

   262545   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   15 Jan 26 17:45:29   

   1k   

   262544   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   15 Jan 26 17:43:51   

   2k   

   262543   

   Tristan Wibberley to All   

   Schematic systems   

   15 Jan 26 23:10:22   

   1k   

   262542   

   olcott to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   15 Jan 26 14:37:24   

   2k   

   262541   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 14:30:41   

   3k   

   262540   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 15:04:28   

   1k   

   262539   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 10:54:19   

   1,070b   

   262538   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 10:54:19   

   7k   

   262537   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 11:34:28   

   6,681b   

   262536   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 11:34:28   

   7k   

   262535   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: What formal logical systems resolve    

   15 Jan 26 14:36:21   

   1k   

   262534   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 15:57:44   

   1k   

   262533   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 14:52:09   

   1k   

   262532   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem proof fails unde   

   15 Jan 26 06:50:36   

   2k   

   262531   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: What formal logical systems resolve    

   15 Jan 26 14:31:09   

   1k   

   262530   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: What formal logical systems resolve    

   15 Jan 26 14:30:56   

   1k   

   262529   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   15 Jan 26 06:50:41   

   1k   

   262528   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   15 Jan 26 06:50:39   

   2k   

   262527   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: What formal logical systems resolve    

   15 Jan 26 06:50:33   

   5k   

   262526   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 11:48:30   

   7k   

   262525   

   Mikko to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   15 Jan 26 12:02:12   

   1k   

   262524   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 11:38:51   

   6k   

   262523   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 11:34:38   

   3k   

   262522   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 11:26:53   

   2,700b   

   262521   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The halting problem proof fails unde   

   14 Jan 26 23:33:05   

   2k   

   262520   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   15 Jan 26 11:21:27   

   6k   

   262519   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   14 Jan 26 23:30:31   

   1k   

   262518   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   14 Jan 26 23:27:29   

   2k   

   262517   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: What formal logical systems resolve    

   14 Jan 26 23:24:48   

   4k   

   262516   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 22:51:56   

   4,473b   

   262515   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem proof fails unde   

   14 Jan 26 22:45:00   

   1k   

   262514   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 19:25:13   

   6k   

   262513   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The halting problem proof fails unde   

   14 Jan 26 18:51:35   

   6,502b   

   262512   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem proof fails unde   

   15 Jan 26 00:26:18   

   6,502b   

   262511   

   olcott to All   

   The halting problem proof fails under op   

   14 Jan 26 18:14:25   

   2k   

   262510   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 13:14:01   

   6k   

   262509   

   olcott to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=   

   14 Jan 26 16:11:16   

   1k   

   262508   

   olcott to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=B6del_   

   14 Jan 26 15:36:14   

   1,081b   

   262507   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 13:35:58   

   6k   

   262506   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 13:19:57   

   6k   

   262505   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 13:32:02   

   3k   

   262504   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 11:28:31   

   6k   

   262503   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 11:04:18   

   5k   

   262502   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 14:52:27   

   1k   

   262501   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 14:55:45   

   1k   

   262500   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 10:24:29   

   1,141b   

   262499   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 11:01:56   

   2k   

   262498   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 10:53:30   

   2k   

   262497   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 09:58:26   

   5k   

   262496   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 10:39:46   

   5,240b   

   262495   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   14 Jan 26 09:40:52   

   6k   

   262494   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   13 Jan 26 12:50:51   

   2k   

   262493   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   13 Jan 26 18:23:42   

   2k   

   262492   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   13 Jan 26 08:31:33   

   2k   

   262491   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   13 Jan 26 08:27:17   

   6k   

   262490   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: What formal logical systems resolve    

   13 Jan 26 12:43:24   

   3k   

   262489   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   13 Jan 26 14:31:01   

   1k   

   262488   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   13 Jan 26 08:34:48   

   1,256b   

   262487   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   13 Jan 26 11:11:20   

   5k   

   262486   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   13 Jan 26 08:17:53   

   6k   

   262485   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   13 Jan 26 11:13:22   

   2k   

   262484   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   13 Jan 26 10:46:37   

   5k   

   262483   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: What formal logical systems resolve    

   12 Jan 26 22:46:43   

   2k   

   262482   

   olcott to All   

   What formal logical systems resolve the    

   12 Jan 26 15:41:27   

   2k   

   262481   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   12 Jan 26 08:43:43   

   5k   

   262480   

   Mikko to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   12 Jan 26 13:05:02   

   4k   

   262479   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   12 Jan 26 08:29:00   

   5k   

   262478   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   12 Jan 26 08:32:20   

   2k   

   262477   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   12 Jan 26 12:44:51   

   4k   

   262476   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   12 Jan 26 12:51:55   

   4k   

   262475   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa   

   12 Jan 26 06:29:34   

   2k   

   262474   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   12 Jan 26 06:32:33   

   1k   

   262473   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Computation and Undecidability   

   11 Jan 26 21:28:40   

   1k   

   262472   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Computation and Undecidability   

   11 Jan 26 15:50:30   

   1k   

   262471   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Computation and Undecidability   

   11 Jan 26 12:12:42   

   1k   

   262470   

   Richard Damon to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Computation and Undecidability   

   11 Jan 26 12:52:37   

   1k   

   262469   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   11 Jan 26 16:16:44   

   1k   

   262468   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_how   

   11 Jan 26 14:49:46   

   1k   

   262467   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computation and Undecidability   

   11 Jan 26 14:39:32   

   1k   

   262466   

   olcott to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   11 Jan 26 08:32:00   

   3k   

   262465   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   11 Jan 26 08:18:11   

   5k   

   262464   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   11 Jan 26 08:23:00   

   4k   

   262463   

   Mikko to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   11 Jan 26 12:34:32   

   3k   

   262462   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa   

   11 Jan 26 12:26:22   

   1k   

   262461   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   11 Jan 26 12:13:32   

   4k   

   262460   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   11 Jan 26 07:09:09   

   2k   

   262459   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   11 Jan 26 12:22:02   

   3k   

   262458   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Computation and Undecidability   

   10 Jan 26 22:32:22   

   1k   

   262457   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Computation and Undecidability   

   10 Jan 26 21:24:25   

   1k   

   262456   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computation and Undecidability (2/2)   

   10 Jan 26 21:18:28   

   1,288b   

   262455   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   10 Jan 26 21:34:41   

   7k   

   262454   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computation and Undecidability (2/2)   

   10 Jan 26 20:52:37   

   6,756b   

   262453   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   10 Jan 26 20:22:27   

   7k   

   262452   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   10 Jan 26 21:03:41   

   7k   

   262451   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   10 Jan 26 19:59:16   

   4k   

   262450   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   10 Jan 26 18:52:47   

   4,372b   

   262449   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   10 Jan 26 18:52:47   

   7k   

   262448   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   10 Jan 26 19:35:31   

   6k   

   262447   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   10 Jan 26 19:35:41   

   5k   

   262446   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   10 Jan 26 18:16:23   

   4k   

   262445   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   10 Jan 26 18:19:44   

   3k   

   262444   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   10 Jan 26 18:13:46   

   5k   

   262443   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   10 Jan 26 18:19:36   

   4k   

   262442   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mild Shock   

   Re: Failed coping with AI: Moshe Vardi (   

   10 Jan 26 17:02:56   

   1k   

   262441   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   Chad Brown's Megalodon goes LLM (Re: Goo   

   10 Jan 26 17:21:21   

   2k   

   262440   

   olcott to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   10 Jan 26 10:19:51   

   3k   

   262439   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   10 Jan 26 09:47:20   

   4k   

   262438   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa   

   10 Jan 26 10:11:17   

   1k   

   262437   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa   

   10 Jan 26 11:02:47   

   1,492b   

   262436   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   10 Jan 26 10:23:14   

   3k   

   262435   

   Mikko to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   10 Jan 26 11:25:01   

   3k   

   262434   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   Help! An AI found a Heuristic for me (Re   

   10 Jan 26 02:40:09   

   2k   

   262433   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   A new proposal: The Gladiator Test (Re:    

   10 Jan 26 03:21:56   

   5k   

   262432   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   Failed coping with AI: Moshe Vardi (Re:    

   10 Jan 26 03:04:18   

   4k   

   262431   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa   

   09 Jan 26 09:53:50   

   1k   

   262430   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   09 Jan 26 09:52:01   

   2k   

   262429   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   09 Jan 26 11:59:26   

   2k   

   262428   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Haskell Curry Foundations of Mathematica   

   09 Jan 26 09:47:45   

   3k   

   262427   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa   

   09 Jan 26 12:03:33   

   2,636b   

   262426   

   olcott to All   

   Prolog formally resolves the Liar Parado   

   08 Jan 26 17:28:22   

   2k   

   262425   

   olcott to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   08 Jan 26 08:18:30   

   3k   

   262424   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   08 Jan 26 08:22:22   

   2k   

   262423   

   Mikko to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   08 Jan 26 12:21:15   

   2k   

   262422   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   08 Jan 26 12:22:50   

   1k   

   262421   

   Tristan Wibberley to Jeff Barnett   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 23:44:04   

   7k   

   262420   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Exactly what are deciders in the theory    

   07 Jan 26 15:29:42   

   3k   

   262419   

   olcott to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   07 Jan 26 07:06:37   

   2k   

   262418   

   Mikko to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   07 Jan 26 14:10:11   

   2k   

   262417   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   07 Jan 26 05:54:47   

   2k   

   262416   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_the   

   06 Jan 26 23:43:09   

   5k   

   262415   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc   

   07 Jan 26 13:49:14   

   5,562b   

   262414   

   olcott to All   

   The Halting Problem asks for too much   

   06 Jan 26 22:44:13   

   5,562b   

   262413   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_the   

   06 Jan 26 15:18:33   

   5,562b   

   262412   

   olcott to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1931_In   

   06 Jan 26 08:02:27   

   1k   

   262411   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   06 Jan 26 08:39:31   

   2k   

   262410   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   06 Jan 26 02:26:01   

   1k   

   262409   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_the   

   06 Jan 26 02:32:46   

   1k   

   262408   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   06 Jan 26 01:59:42   

   1k   

   262407   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   06 Jan 26 01:02:38   

   2k   

   262406   

   Tristan Wibberley to Jeff Barnett   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   06 Jan 26 00:47:45   

   2k   

   262405   

   olcott to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Why_do_people_ignore_how_G=C3=   

   05 Jan 26 18:06:15   

   1,617b   

   262404   

   Mike Terry to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 23:10:16   

   4k   

   262403   

   Jeff Barnett to All   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 14:16:12   

   4,040b   

   262402   

   olcott to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 12:01:43   

   6k   

   262401   

   Mike Terry to Jeff Barnett   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 17:04:47   

   6k   

   262400   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   05 Jan 26 08:59:50   

   2k   

   262399   

   olcott to Mikko   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_the   

   05 Jan 26 08:54:07   

   2k   

   262398   

   olcott to athel.cb@gmail.com   

   Re: Computing truth values from finite s   

   05 Jan 26 08:30:57   

   1k   

   262397   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 08:22:57   

   2k   

   262396   

   Mikko to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_the   

   05 Jan 26 16:20:05   

   2k   

   262395   

   olcott to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Why_do_people_ignore_the_simpl   

   05 Jan 26 08:04:28   

   1k   

   262394   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 11:24:49   

   1k   

   262393   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 11:18:09   

   2k   

   262392   

   user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid to All   

   Re: Computing truth values from finite s   

   05 Jan 26 09:14:03   

   1,538b   

   262391   

   Jeff Barnett to All   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   04 Jan 26 23:53:32   

   1,538b   

   262390   

   Mild Shock to All   

   Good Morning, Vietnam! Sudoku 2026 Chall   

   05 Jan 26 12:13:19   

   1,538b   

   262389   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 08:43:54   

   4k   

   262388   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 07:46:14   

   2k   

   262387   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 07:30:57   

   2k   

   262386   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 07:53:44   

   2k   

   262385   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 06:22:16   

   1k   

   262384   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   04 Jan 26 23:30:22   

   3k   

   262383   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 05:11:10   

   2k   

   262382   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   04 Jan 26 23:26:56   

   2,083b   

   262381   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 04:54:19   

   1k   

   262380   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   05 Jan 26 04:42:55   

   1k   

   262379   

   Jeff Barnett to All   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   04 Jan 26 18:48:12   

   1,296b   

   262378   

   Jeff Barnett to All   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   04 Jan 26 15:13:52   

   1,296b   

   262377   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   04 Jan 26 18:13:01   

   6k   

   262376   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computing truth values from finite s   

   04 Jan 26 14:45:41   

   6k   

   262375   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   04 Jan 26 14:32:37   

   2k   

   262374   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   04 Jan 26 14:25:55   

   7k   

   262373   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computing truth values from finite s   

   04 Jan 26 13:56:54   

   6k   

   262372   

   Mike Terry to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   04 Jan 26 18:55:51   

   6k   

   262371   

   olcott to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   04 Jan 26 13:44:34   

   6k   

   262370   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computing truth values from finite s   

   04 Jan 26 12:05:09   

   4k   

   262369   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   04 Jan 26 11:59:32   

   7k   

   262368   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   03 Jan 26 21:56:12   

   7k   

   262367   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computing truth values from finite s   

   03 Jan 26 20:58:46   

   3k   

   262366   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   03 Jan 26 20:53:46   

   7k   

   262365   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computing truth values from finite s   

   03 Jan 26 20:44:30   

   2k   

   262364   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   03 Jan 26 20:42:45   

   7k   

   262363   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   03 Jan 26 19:48:06   

   7k   

   262362   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computing truth values from finite s   

   03 Jan 26 19:51:43   

   2k   

   262361   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computing truth values from finite s   

   03 Jan 26 18:14:07   

   2k   

   262360   

   Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computing truth values from finite s   

   04 Jan 26 00:44:33   

   1k   

   262359   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   03 Jan 26 18:09:40   

   1,321b   

   262358   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   03 Jan 26 18:09:40   

   7k   

   262357   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   03 Jan 26 16:57:11   

   7k   

   262356   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Computing truth values from finite s   

   03 Jan 26 16:59:49   

   1k   

   262355   

   Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn to olcott   

   Re: Key difference between math and the    

   03 Jan 26 22:20:03   

   2k   

   262354   

   olcott to Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn   

   Re: Key difference between math and the    

   03 Jan 26 16:14:15   

   2k   

   262353   

   olcott to All   

   Computing truth values from finite strin   

   03 Jan 26 16:15:51   

   2,319b   

   262352   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 22:11:36   

   2k   

   262351   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 22:03:48   

   4k   

   262350   

   Mike Terry to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 21:39:17   

   6k   

   262349   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 21:24:04   

   2k   

   262348   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 20:58:57   

   1k   

   262347   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   03 Jan 26 14:36:53   

   6k   

   262346   

   Richard Damon to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 14:11:38   

   6,630b   

   262345   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 14:24:33   

   6k   

   262344   

   Tristan Wibberley to All   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 18:54:58   

   2k   

   262343   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 19:02:00   

   3k   

   262342   

   olcott to All   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 11:30:12   

   2k   

   262341   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 17:35:09   

   1k   

   262340   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 11:44:07   

   1,093b   

   262339   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 16:59:55   

   1,093b   

   262338   

   olcott to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 10:47:55   

   1,093b   

   262337   

   olcott to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 10:47:55   

   7k   

   262336   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 16:54:30   

   2k   

   262335   

   Mike Terry to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 16:32:58   

   5k   

   262334   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   03 Jan 26 09:32:10   

   6k   

   262333   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 10:31:38   

   3k   

   262332   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 10:36:35   

   1k   

   262331   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 08:03:07   

   4k   

   262330   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   03 Jan 26 07:17:07   

   1k   

   262329   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   02 Jan 26 23:09:51   

   4k   

   262328   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   02 Jan 26 19:30:23   

   3k   

   262327   

   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 19:43:02   

   2k   

   262326   

   olcott to Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn   

   Re: Key difference between math and the    

   02 Jan 26 17:20:54   

   2k   

   262325   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori   

   02 Jan 26 17:10:20   

   2k   

   262324   

   olcott to Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn   

   Re: Key difference between math and the    

   02 Jan 26 17:17:25   

   1k   

   262323   

   Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn to olcott   

   Re: Key difference between math and the    

   02 Jan 26 23:30:03   

   1,381b   

   262322   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon   

   Re: Key difference between math and the    

   02 Jan 26 11:33:36   

   1k   

   262321   

   Mike Terry to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 17:24:08   

   3k   

   262320   

   olcott to All   

   Key difference between math and the phil   

   02 Jan 26 10:08:58   

   2,892b   

   262319   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 08:44:24   

   3k   

   262318   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 08:47:17   

   4k   

   262317   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 07:43:59   

   1k   

   262316   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 07:40:30   

   2k   

   262315   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 23:57:37   

   3k   

   262314   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 08:15:22   

   3k   

   262313   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 06:14:33   

   2k   

   262312   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 06:20:59   

   3k   

   262311   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 05:57:33   

   1k   

   262310   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 05:37:33   

   1k   

   262309   

   Tristan Wibberley to All   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 05:54:21   

   2k   

   262308   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 05:48:03   

   2k   

   262307   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 23:20:55   

   5k   

   262306   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 22:22:40   

   2k   

   262305   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 22:17:17   

   3k   

   262304   

   olcott to All   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 21:33:59   

   2k   

   262303   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 21:26:55   

   3k   

   262302   

   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 19:45:55   

   1k   

   262301   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 20:38:18   

   2k   

   262300   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 20:07:58   

   1k   

   262299   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 00:13:35   

   2k   

   262298   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 00:10:53   

   2k   

   262297   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   02 Jan 26 00:12:33   

   2k   

   262296   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 23:19:13   

   1k   

   262295   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 23:17:23   

   1k   

   262294   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 23:13:50   

   1k   

   262293   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   01 Jan 26 16:44:46   

   5k   

   262292   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 22:13:48   

   4,988b   

   262291   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 22:24:40   

   5k   

   262290   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   01 Jan 26 22:12:40   

   4,619b   

   262289   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   01 Jan 26 16:05:56   

   3k   

   262288   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   01 Jan 26 15:46:53   

   2k   

   262287   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   01 Jan 26 14:03:50   

   2k   

   262286   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1   

   01 Jan 26 12:08:32   

   1k   

   262285   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots   

   01 Jan 26 11:59:32   

   3k   

   262284   

   olcott to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1931_In   

   01 Jan 26 08:45:19   

   2,603b   

   262283   

   Jeff Barnett to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots   

   01 Jan 26 01:15:57   

   2k   

   262282   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   31 Dec 25 23:03:33   

   5k   

   262281   

   olcott to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots   

   31 Dec 25 22:59:23   

   2k   

   262280   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   31 Dec 25 20:15:21   

   4k   

   262279   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   31 Dec 25 19:04:07   

   4k   

   262278   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   31 Dec 25 18:23:03   

   3k   

   262277   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   31 Dec 25 17:08:00   

   3k   

   262276   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   31 Dec 25 16:42:43   

   2k   

   262275   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   31 Dec 25 15:59:24   

   2k   

   262274   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   31 Dec 25 15:57:58   

   3k   

   262273   

   olcott to Pierre Asselin   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   31 Dec 25 15:52:46   

   1k   

   262272   

   Pierre Asselin to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   31 Dec 25 21:18:18   

   1,388b   

   262271   

   Pierre Asselin to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   31 Dec 25 21:16:39   

   1,388b   

   262270   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: The exact meaning of these exact wor   

   31 Dec 25 14:12:06   

   1k   

   262269   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The exact meaning of these exact wor   

   31 Dec 25 11:51:43   

   5k   

   262268   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The exact meaning of these exact wor   

   31 Dec 25 10:20:26   

   2k   

   262267   

   olcott to All   

   The exact meaning of these exact words p   

   30 Dec 25 22:21:51   

   2,255b   

   262266   

   olcott to Jeff Barnett   

   Re: Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots   

   30 Dec 25 20:23:15   

   2k   

   262265   

   olcott to Jeff Barnett   

   Turing-machine decider properly formaliz   

   30 Dec 25 20:06:27   

   2k   

   262264   

   Pierre Asselin to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   30 Dec 25 23:14:40   

   2k   

   262263   

   Jeff Barnett to Richard Damon   

   Re: Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots   

   30 Dec 25 18:05:02   

   1k   

   262262   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 15:41:57   

   2k   

   262261   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 15:39:36   

   1,747b   

   262260   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 21:34:18   

   2k   

   262259   

   Tristan Wibberley to Bonita Montero   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   30 Dec 25 21:23:30   

   2,005b   

   262258   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 21:26:50   

   1k   

   262257   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 14:35:29   

   1k   

   262256   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 20:22:02   

   1k   

   262255   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 13:13:10   

   5k   

   262254   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   30 Dec 25 13:11:14   

   3k   

   262253   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 13:08:51   

   2k   

   262252   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 13:01:19   

   6k   

   262251   

   olcott to Bonita Montero   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   30 Dec 25 12:53:34   

   2k   

   262250   

   Bonita Montero to All   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   30 Dec 25 19:45:58   

   1k   

   262249   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   30 Dec 25 09:11:33   

   1k   

   262248   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 10:15:55   

   5k   

   262247   

   Mike Terry to joes   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   30 Dec 25 18:18:06   

   3k   

   262246   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 09:10:11   

   2k   

   262245   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   30 Dec 25 08:56:25   

   2,178b   

   262244   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 08:52:11   

   6k   

   262243   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 08:32:34   

   1k   

   262242   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   30 Dec 25 05:49:34   

   1k   

   262241   

   joes to All   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   30 Dec 25 09:47:48   

   2k   

   262240   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   29 Dec 25 23:33:25   

   4k   

   262239   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   29 Dec 25 22:35:44   

   2k   

   262238   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 23:46:45   

   2,426b   

   262237   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_   

   29 Dec 25 17:28:26   

   3k   

   262236   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   =?UTF-8?Q?readers_are_conned_into_believ   

   29 Dec 25 15:38:44   

   2k   

   262235   

   olcott to All   

   Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots   

   29 Dec 25 17:07:24   

   2,484b   

   262234   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 13:37:48   

   5k   

   262233   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 22:35:02   

   2k   

   262232   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 20:46:28   

   1k   

   262231   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   29 Dec 25 20:36:21   

   3k   

   262230   

   olcott to Bonita Montero   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 14:06:59   

   2,672b   

   262229   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   29 Dec 25 20:20:11   

   3k   

   262228   

   Bonita Montero to All   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 20:50:45   

   3,154b   

   262227   

   olcott to Pierre Asselin   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   29 Dec 25 13:32:01   

   1k   

   262226   

   Pierre Asselin to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   29 Dec 25 19:21:08   

   1,309b   

   262225   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 19:07:42   

   2k   

   262224   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   29 Dec 25 18:42:35   

   2k   

   262223   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   

   29 Dec 25 12:52:34   

   2k   

   262222   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 10:27:30   

   3k   

   262221   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 12:37:38   

   4k   

   262220   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 10:31:17   

   3,703b   

   262219   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 10:31:17   

   6k   

   262218   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 13:18:38   

   6,603b   

   262217   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 10:39:19   

   7k   

   262216   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 09:48:33   

   6k   

   262215   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 11:08:03   

   6,184b   

   262214   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 16:04:37   

   2k   

   262213   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 09:47:29   

   6k   

   262212   

   olcott to Bonita Montero   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 09:25:25   

   6,438b   

   262211   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 09:24:01   

   5k   

   262210   

   Bonita Montero to All   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 16:08:15   

   5,558b   

   262209   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   29 Dec 25 08:55:19   

   5k   

   262208   

   WM to All   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   28 Dec 25 19:20:30   

   5,443b   

   262207   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   28 Dec 25 22:59:57   

   4k   

   262206   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   28 Dec 25 18:42:52   

   3k   

   262205   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   28 Dec 25 07:49:08   

   2k   

   262204   

   Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   28 Dec 25 06:23:14   

   1,885b   

   262203   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   28 Dec 25 07:00:31   

   2k   

   262202   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour   

   27 Dec 25 22:40:18   

   1k   

   262201   

   olcott to All   

   Thought this through for 30,000 hours ov   

   27 Dec 25 18:54:33   

   1,427b   

   262200   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   27 Dec 25 18:40:32   

   1,427b   

   262199   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   27 Dec 25 18:38:29   

   1,427b   

   262198   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   27 Dec 25 10:13:53   

   3k   

   262197   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   27 Dec 25 11:17:57   

   2k   

   262196   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   27 Dec 25 10:57:01   

   6k   

   262195   

   olcott to olcott   

   Proof that the halting problem is incorr   

   27 Dec 25 10:49:53   

   6,095b   

   262194   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   27 Dec 25 09:01:29   

   2k   

   262193   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: By what process can we trust the ana   

   26 Dec 25 22:59:37   

   1k   

   262192   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 22:54:40   

   6k   

   262191   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: By what process can we trust the ana   

   27 Dec 25 04:50:37   

   1k   

   262190   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: By what process can we trust the ana   

   26 Dec 25 22:35:36   

   2k   

   262189   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: By what process can we trust the ana   

   26 Dec 25 21:52:46   

   1k   

   262188   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 21:48:01   

   1,346b   

   262187   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 21:48:01   

   6k   

   262186   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 21:22:59   

   6k   

   262185   

   olcott to All   

   By what process can we trust the analysi   

   26 Dec 25 21:19:46   

   6,620b   

   262184   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 20:38:59   

   6k   

   262183   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 19:17:45   

   6,603b   

   262182   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 19:17:45   

   6k   

   262181   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 12:07:44   

   5k   

   262180   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 11:18:57   

   4k   

   262179   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 09:20:21   

   2k   

   262178   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 10:56:45   

   3k   

   262177   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   26 Dec 25 07:54:14   

   3k   

   262176   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   25 Dec 25 22:51:56   

   4k   

   262175   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   25 Dec 25 21:12:57   

   3k   

   262174   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   25 Dec 25 21:37:47   

   4k   

   262173   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   25 Dec 25 20:20:28   

   2k   

   262172   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   25 Dec 25 19:45:03   

   1,822b   

   262171   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   25 Dec 25 19:17:15   

   1,822b   

   262170   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   25 Dec 25 18:48:02   

   1,822b   

   262169   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in   

   25 Dec 25 17:42:34   

   1,822b   

   262168   

   olcott to All   

   Proof that the halting problem is incorr   

   25 Dec 25 17:39:26   

   1,822b   

   262167   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 21:22:53   

   3k   

   262166   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 21:22:53   

   7k   

   262165   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 21:22:53   

   7k   

   262164   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 21:22:53   

   7k   

   262163   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 21:22:53   

   7k   

   262162   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 17:30:57   

   1k   

   262161   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 17:30:57   

   7k   

   262160   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 17:30:57   

   7k   

   262159   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 17:30:57   

   7k   

   262158   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 17:30:57   

   7k   

   262157   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 17:30:57   

   6k   

   262156   

   olcott to All   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 16:11:20   

   1k   

   262155   

   olcott to All   

   Categorically exhaustive reasoning   

   24 Dec 25 16:58:26   

   1,076b   

   262154   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 16:01:22   

   4k   

   262153   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 14:56:33   

   3k   

   262152   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The scope of computation defines its   

   24 Dec 25 14:11:47   

   1k   

   262151   

   olcott to All   

   The scope of computation defines its tru   

   24 Dec 25 13:20:16   

   1,422b   

   262150   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 12:41:14   

   5k   

   262149   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 12:41:14   

   7k   

   262148   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 13:04:33   

   4k   

   262147   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 13:09:14   

   2k   

   262146   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 11:36:22   

   3k   

   262145   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 11:36:22   

   7k   

   262144   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 10:29:52   

   4k   

   262143   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 12:13:03   

   2k   

   262142   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 10:59:13   

   7k   

   262141   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 10:41:11   

   5k   

   262140   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 09:49:52   

   6k   

   262139   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 09:49:52   

   6k   

   262138   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 10:12:19   

   3k   

   262137   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 07:12:17   

   3k   

   262136   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 08:48:05   

   2k   

   262135   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 08:48:05   

   7k   

   262134   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 09:22:16   

   3k   

   262133   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   24 Dec 25 09:22:16   

   6k   

   262132   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 22:44:08   

   2k   

   262131   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 22:44:08   

   7k   

   262130   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 23:09:10   

   6,669b   

   262129   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 22:02:17   

   6,669b   

   262128   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 22:02:17   

   6k   

   262127   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 22:01:10   

   6,650b   

   262126   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 20:23:13   

   5k   

   262125   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 21:44:02   

   6k   

   262124   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 18:08:31   

   4k   

   262123   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 18:03:02   

   3k   

   262122   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 11:24:24   

   2k   

   262121   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 11:20:31   

   2k   

   262120   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 10:43:23   

   2k   

   262119   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de   

   23 Dec 25 10:32:16   

   2k   

   262118   

   olcott to All   

   Turing-machine deciders a precise defini   

   23 Dec 25 09:34:19   

   1k   

   262117   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as   

   23 Dec 25 06:36:27   

   2k   

   262116   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as   

   22 Dec 25 21:54:35   

   1,594b   

   262115   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as   

   22 Dec 25 21:56:24   

   1k   

   262114   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as   

   22 Dec 25 21:17:09   

   2k   

   262113   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as   

   22 Dec 25 21:31:46   

   3k   

   262112   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as   

   22 Dec 25 21:41:37   

   1k   

   262111   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as   

   22 Dec 25 21:20:01   

   2k   

   262110   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as   

   22 Dec 25 21:11:29   

   1k   

   262109   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I spent 22 years on the notion of un   

   22 Dec 25 15:56:44   

   4k   

   262108   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I spent 22 years on the notion of un   

   22 Dec 25 15:38:33   

   2k   

   262107   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Bonita Montero   

   Re: Conventional notion of deciders   

   22 Dec 25 13:34:33   

   1k   

   262106   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Conventional notion of deciders   

   22 Dec 25 20:56:28   

   2k   

   262105   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c   

   22 Dec 25 14:11:34   

   5k   

   262104   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c   

   22 Dec 25 13:46:23   

   5k   

   262103   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I spent 22 years on the notion of un   

   22 Dec 25 14:01:28   

   2k   

   262102   

   Kaz Kylheku to Richard Damon   

   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c   

   22 Dec 25 19:30:32   

   2,243b   

   262101   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I spent 22 years on the notion of un   

   22 Dec 25 13:09:13   

   1k   

   262100   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c   

   22 Dec 25 13:05:54   

   3k   

   262099   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: I spent 22 years on the notion of un   

   22 Dec 25 12:55:12   

   3,239b   

   262098   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c   

   22 Dec 25 12:35:14   

   2k   

   262097   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c   

   22 Dec 25 12:09:13   

   2k   

   262096   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c   

   22 Dec 25 11:59:52   

   2k   

   262095   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo   

   21 Dec 25 22:26:02   

   3k   

   262094   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c   

   22 Dec 25 11:30:50   

   2k   

   262093   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c   

   22 Dec 25 11:19:47   

   1,756b   

   262092   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c   

   22 Dec 25 19:11:56   

   1,756b   

   262091   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   22 Dec 25 10:31:08   

   6k   

   262090   

   olcott to Bonita Montero   

   Re: Conventional notion of deciders   

   22 Dec 25 10:30:10   

   1k   

   262089   

   Bonita Montero to All   

   Re: Conventional notion of deciders   

   22 Dec 25 16:22:12   

   1k   

   262088   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   21 Dec 25 22:24:33   

   6k   

   262087   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo   

   21 Dec 25 21:22:46   

   3k   

   262086   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   21 Dec 25 21:19:40   

   6k   

   262085   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo   

   21 Dec 25 20:57:30   

   2k   

   262084   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   21 Dec 25 20:38:33   

   5k   

   262083   

   olcott to Mr Flibble   

   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo   

   21 Dec 25 20:08:07   

   2k   

   262082   

   Mr Flibble to olcott   

   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo   

   22 Dec 25 01:35:56   

   1,691b   

   262081   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   21 Dec 25 19:13:36   

   4k   

   262080   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo   

   21 Dec 25 18:57:30   

   3k   

   262079   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   21 Dec 25 18:59:25   

   3k   

   262078   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo   

   21 Dec 25 18:53:31   

   3k   

   262077   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo   

   21 Dec 25 18:38:36   

   2k   

   262076   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo   

   21 Dec 25 18:33:39   

   2k   

   262075   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo   

   21 Dec 25 18:15:07   

   2k   

   262074   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   21 Dec 25 18:05:03   

   2k   

   262073   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo   

   21 Dec 25 18:00:39   

   2k   

   262072   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   21 Dec 25 16:39:01   

   2k   

   262071   

   olcott to Bonita Montero   

   Re: Conventional notion of deciders   

   21 Dec 25 16:36:08   

   1k   

   262070   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   21 Dec 25 21:37:40   

   1k   

   262069   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Bonita Montero   

   Re: Conventional notion of deciders   

   21 Dec 25 12:18:43   

   1,240b   

   262068   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   21 Dec 25 19:59:00   

   1k   

   262067   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The fundamental nature of computatio   

   21 Dec 25 12:38:38   

   1,304b   

   262066   

   Bonita Montero to All   

   Re: Conventional notion of deciders   

   21 Dec 25 19:34:15   

   1,304b   

   262065   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   21 Dec 25 09:16:43   

   4k   

   262064   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   21 Dec 25 09:00:22   

   2k   

   262063   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   21 Dec 25 08:12:14   

   2,489b   

   262062   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   21 Dec 25 08:12:14   

   6k   

   262061   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The fundamental nature of computatio   

   21 Dec 25 08:57:24   

   6k   

   262060   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   21 Dec 25 08:49:26   

   6k   

   262059   

   olcott to All   

   Conventional notion of deciders   

   21 Dec 25 08:37:22   

   6,647b   

   262058   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   21 Dec 25 13:11:05   

   6k   

   262057   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   21 Dec 25 12:38:31   

   1k   

   262056   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   The fundamental nature of computational    

   20 Dec 25 20:33:18   

   4k   

   262055   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   20 Dec 25 18:03:37   

   2k   

   262054   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 17:56:00   

   6k   

   262053   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   20 Dec 25 17:45:29   

   2k   

   262052   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   20 Dec 25 17:47:06   

   2k   

   262051   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   20 Dec 25 17:28:38   

   1k   

   262050   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 17:26:31   

   5k   

   262049   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   20 Dec 25 17:25:05   

   1k   

   262048   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 16:55:21   

   5k   

   262047   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 15:36:01   

   3k   

   262046   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 16:05:51   

   3k   

   262045   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 14:56:31   

   2k   

   262044   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 14:19:02   

   2k   

   262043   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 13:22:22   

   1k   

   262042   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: Turing machines can not run other Tu   

   20 Dec 25 10:35:34   

   1k   

   262041   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 08:54:42   

   1k   

   262040   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The most definitive measure of the b   

   20 Dec 25 08:51:08   

   5k   

   262039   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The most definitive measure of the b   

   20 Dec 25 08:07:59   

   3k   

   262038   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: Turing machines can not run other Tu   

   20 Dec 25 07:42:23   

   3,466b   

   262037   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 07:49:55   

   3,466b   

   262036   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   20 Dec 25 05:54:51   

   6k   

   262035   

   olcott to All   

   Turing machines can not run other Turing   

   20 Dec 25 07:09:16   

   5,671b   

   262034   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 05:44:17   

   5,671b   

   262033   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 05:58:23   

   5,671b   

   262032   

   olcott to All   

   Three page proof that the Halting Proble   

   20 Dec 25 06:07:49   

   5,671b   

   262031   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   20 Dec 25 12:22:00   

   5k   

   262030   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   19 Dec 25 21:21:35   

   3k   

   262029   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   20 Dec 25 12:07:54   

   2,675b   

   262028   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --   

   19 Dec 25 19:49:54   

   2,675b   

   262027   

   olcott to All   

   How do halt deciders really work? --- AK   

   19 Dec 25 19:27:44   

   2,675b   

   262026   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   19 Dec 25 17:46:34   

   1k   

   262025   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   19 Dec 25 22:38:09   

   1k   

   262024   

   dart200 to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   19 Dec 25 11:16:55   

   2k   

   262023   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   19 Dec 25 10:13:00   

   4k   

   262022   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   19 Dec 25 08:52:47   

   5k   

   262021   

   wm to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   19 Dec 25 13:38:11   

   2k   

   262020   

   dart200 to All   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   19 Dec 25 00:25:49   

   5k   

   262019   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   19 Dec 25 12:16:58   

   1k   

   262018   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   18 Dec 25 22:14:18   

   3k   

   262017   

   dart200 to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   18 Dec 25 21:54:05   

   4k   

   262016   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   18 Dec 25 21:36:08   

   3k   

   262015   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   18 Dec 25 20:25:04   

   3k   

   262014   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   18 Dec 25 20:46:05   

   3k   

   262013   

   olcott to All   

   Re: on what are you even crying about ri   

   18 Dec 25 19:06:14   

   3k   

   262012   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   18 Dec 25 19:11:38   

   2k   

   262011   

   dart200 to polcott   

   Re: on what are you even crying about ri   

   18 Dec 25 16:54:34   

   2k   

   262010   

   polcott to All   

   Re: on what are you even crying about ri   

   18 Dec 25 18:45:00   

   2k   

   262009   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   18 Dec 25 17:38:09   

   1k   

   262008   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   18 Dec 25 22:04:55   

   1k   

   262007   

   wm to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   18 Dec 25 18:44:17   

   2k   

   262006   

   Julio Di Egidio to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   18 Dec 25 18:53:24   

   2k   

   262005   

   WM to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   18 Dec 25 19:25:35   

   1k   

   262004   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   18 Dec 25 12:51:13   

   3k   

   262003   

   Julio Di Egidio to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   18 Dec 25 15:59:34   

   1k   

   262002   

   WM to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   18 Dec 25 12:57:50   

   1k   

   262001   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   18 Dec 25 07:02:08   

   2k   

   262000   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   18 Dec 25 07:04:55   

   3k   

   261999   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   18 Dec 25 06:43:38   

   2k   

   261998   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   18 Dec 25 12:36:33   

   3k   

   261997   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   18 Dec 25 12:20:51   

   1k   

   261996   

   WM to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   18 Dec 25 12:53:40   

   1,217b   

   261995   

   Julio Di Egidio to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   18 Dec 25 10:04:07   

   1,217b   

   261994   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   18 Dec 25 12:33:29   

   2k   

   261993   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   17 Dec 25 23:26:01   

   3k   

   261992   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   17 Dec 25 22:57:34   

   3k   

   261991   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   17 Dec 25 22:38:13   

   1k   

   261990   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   17 Dec 25 12:18:28   

   1,057b   

   261989   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Mikko   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   17 Dec 25 12:06:06   

   1,057b   

   261988   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   17 Dec 25 11:09:11   

   2k   

   261987   

   wm to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   17 Dec 25 19:22:28   

   2,160b   

   261986   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   17 Dec 25 08:06:34   

   3k   

   261985   

   olcott to Richard Heathfield   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   17 Dec 25 09:31:06   

   2k   

   261984   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: DD simulated by HHH specifies non-ha   

   17 Dec 25 07:48:48   

   5k   

   261983   

   Mikko to Chris M. Thomasson   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   17 Dec 25 12:44:09   

   5,277b   

   261982   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   17 Dec 25 07:33:09   

   1k   

   261981   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: DD simulated by HHH specifies non-ha   

   17 Dec 25 10:45:50   

   2k   

   261980   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The primary first principle of all T   

   17 Dec 25 11:00:26   

   1k   

   261979   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   17 Dec 25 12:49:01   

   7k   

   261978   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Dark Points   

   17 Dec 25 12:10:45   

   6,753b   

   261977   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   17 Dec 25 12:41:39   

   3k   

   261976   

   Mikko to Richard Heathfield   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   17 Dec 25 12:32:56   

   1k   

   261975   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The most definitive measure of the b   

   17 Dec 25 12:01:13   

   2k   

   261974   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The most definitive measure of the b   

   17 Dec 25 12:01:13   

   7k   

   261973   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   17 Dec 25 12:21:45   

   2k   

   261972   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   17 Dec 25 12:07:07   

   2k   

   261971   

   olcott to All   

   The primary first principle of all Turin   

   16 Dec 25 21:36:16   

   2,249b   

   261970   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   DD simulated by HHH specifies non-haltin   

   16 Dec 25 18:33:19   

   2,249b   

   261969   

   olcott to Mikko   

   The most definitive measure of the behav   

   16 Dec 25 11:30:01   

   2k   

   261968   

   olcott to Mikko   

   The most definitive measure of the behav   

   16 Dec 25 11:30:01   

   7k   

   261967   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon   

   Re: on just search the literature bruh   

   16 Dec 25 12:05:46   

   3k   

   261966   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: on just search the literature bruh   

   16 Dec 25 18:15:53   

   1k   

   261965   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   The most definitive measure of the behav   

   16 Dec 25 11:21:18   

   1k   

   261964   

   olcott to All   

   Re: on just search the literature bruh   

   16 Dec 25 11:00:13   

   1,112b   

   261963   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   16 Dec 25 11:48:45   

   1k   

   261962   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   16 Dec 25 11:48:45   

   7k   

   261961   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   16 Dec 25 11:44:40   

   7k   

   261960   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: on just search the literature bruh   

   15 Dec 25 22:40:05   

   6,740b   

   261959   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   15 Dec 25 21:47:57   

   6,740b   

   261958   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   15 Dec 25 22:53:45   

   4k   

   261957   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   15 Dec 25 19:31:39   

   3k   

   261956   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   15 Dec 25 12:51:26   

   3,057b   

   261955   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 12:58:02   

   2k   

   261954   

   olcott to All   

   Re: on just search the literature bruh (   

   15 Dec 25 14:42:07   

   5k   

   261953   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 14:16:22   

   3k   

   261952   

   wm to All   

   Dark Points   

   15 Dec 25 18:18:01   

   2,639b   

   261951   

   olcott to Richard Heathfield   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 10:34:46   

   1k   

   261950   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   15 Dec 25 10:13:58   

   4k   

   261949   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 10:03:21   

   1k   

   261948   

   Richard Heathfield to Mikko   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 16:20:56   

   1,399b   

   261947   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   15 Dec 25 10:20:07   

   4k   

   261946   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts (3/3)   

   15 Dec 25 09:56:24   

   3k   

   261945   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)   

   15 Dec 25 09:56:24   

   7k   

   261944   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   15 Dec 25 09:49:18   

   6k   

   261943   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts (3/3)   

   15 Dec 25 09:42:32   

   2k   

   261942   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)   

   15 Dec 25 09:42:32   

   7k   

   261941   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 15:12:34   

   1k   

   261940   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 08:20:53   

   5k   

   261939   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   15 Dec 25 08:31:33   

   3k   

   261938   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   15 Dec 25 08:10:03   

   3k   

   261937   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   15 Dec 25 08:05:45   

   2k   

   261936   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   15 Dec 25 07:53:31   

   4k   

   261935   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   15 Dec 25 08:03:04   

   6k   

   261934   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 08:01:26   

   1k   

   261933   

   Mikko to Richard Heathfield   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 12:08:35   

   1k   

   261932   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   15 Dec 25 12:15:31   

   2k   

   261931   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts (3/3)   

   15 Dec 25 11:48:16   

   1,646b   

   261930   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)   

   15 Dec 25 11:48:16   

   7k   

   261929   

   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Best First Principle of Turing Machi   

   15 Dec 25 11:56:39   

   7,527b   

   261928   

   Mikko to polcott   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)   

   15 Dec 25 11:44:00   

   6k   

   261927   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   15 Dec 25 11:52:07   

   7k   

   261926   

   Mikko to polcott   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   15 Dec 25 11:31:27   

   1k   

   261925   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   15 Dec 25 11:24:01   

   2k   

   261924   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   15 Dec 25 11:20:33   

   2k   

   261923   

   Richard Heathfield to Mikko   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 09:14:12   

   1k   

   261922   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   15 Dec 25 11:10:14   

   2k   

   261921   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 10:53:46   

   1,982b   

   261920   

   Tristan Wibberley to polcott   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   15 Dec 25 08:09:26   

   4k   

   261919   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   15 Dec 25 11:04:46   

   1k   

   261918   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   15 Dec 25 11:04:46   

   7k   

   261917   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   15 Dec 25 06:20:03   

   1k   

   261916   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   14 Dec 25 21:32:54   

   3k   

   261915   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   14 Dec 25 19:11:37   

   3k   

   261914   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   14 Dec 25 19:17:40   

   2k   

   261913   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually    

   14 Dec 25 18:51:27   

   1k   

   261912   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   14 Dec 25 18:39:01   

   2k   

   261911   

   olcott to All   

   Exactly what halt deciders actually do   

   14 Dec 25 18:31:01   

   1,964b   

   261910   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   14 Dec 25 18:15:03   

   2k   

   261909   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   14 Dec 25 17:46:09   

   2k   

   261908   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   14 Dec 25 17:14:35   

   1k   

   261907   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   14 Dec 25 17:14:35   

   6k   

   261906   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   14 Dec 25 17:39:14   

   3k   

   261905   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   14 Dec 25 14:57:23   

   2k   

   261904   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   14 Dec 25 19:03:29   

   2k   

   261903   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   14 Dec 25 10:32:15   

   1k   

   261902   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   14 Dec 25 10:25:51   

   1k   

   261901   

   polcott to joes   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   14 Dec 25 09:34:13   

   2k   

   261900   

   polcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   14 Dec 25 10:16:26   

   3k   

   261899   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   14 Dec 25 12:51:33   

   2k   

   261898   

   Mikko to polcott   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   14 Dec 25 13:02:40   

   2k   

   261897   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   14 Dec 25 13:05:33   

   5k   

   261896   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Best First Principle of Turing Machi   

   14 Dec 25 12:54:20   

   2k   

   261895   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   14 Dec 25 12:46:49   

   1k   

   261894   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem itself is unequi   

   14 Dec 25 12:38:50   

   1,397b   

   261893   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   14 Dec 25 12:12:29   

   2k   

   261892   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   14 Dec 25 12:43:47   

   1k   

   261891   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   14 Dec 25 12:05:28   

   7k   

   261890   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   14 Dec 25 04:58:42   

   2k   

   261889   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   14 Dec 25 04:29:57   

   2k   

   261888   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   13 Dec 25 22:16:10   

   5k   

   261887   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   13 Dec 25 21:39:48   

   5k   

   261886   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   13 Dec 25 20:30:05   

   3k   

   261885   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect   

   13 Dec 25 16:41:47   

   1k   

   261884   

   olcott to All   

   Defining a halt decider with perfect acc   

   13 Dec 25 15:32:26   

   1,523b   

   261883   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   13 Dec 25 15:23:08   

   2k   

   261882   

   olcott to All   

   The halting problem itself is unequivoca   

   13 Dec 25 15:07:25   

   1,674b   

   261881   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   13 Dec 25 14:13:40   

   1k   

   261880   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   13 Dec 25 14:19:01   

   1k   

   261879   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   13 Dec 25 13:50:57   

   1k   

   261878   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   13 Dec 25 13:47:36   

   1k   

   261877   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   13 Dec 25 11:38:06   

   1,078b   

   261876   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   13 Dec 25 19:28:06   

   1k   

   261875   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The correct foundation of the theory   

   13 Dec 25 19:33:40   

   2k   

   261874   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   13 Dec 25 18:25:37   

   1k   

   261873   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   13 Dec 25 11:36:32   

   2k   

   261872   

   Tristan Wibberley to polcott   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   13 Dec 25 16:59:53   

   2k   

   261871   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Best First Principle of Turing Machi   

   13 Dec 25 10:49:42   

   1,999b   

   261870   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Best First Principle of Turing Machi   

   13 Dec 25 16:35:29   

   1,999b   

   261869   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   13 Dec 25 09:55:43   

   6k   

   261868   

   olcott to All   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts (3/3)   

   13 Dec 25 10:22:04   

   6,625b   

   261867   

   olcott to All   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)   

   13 Dec 25 10:22:04   

   7k   

   261866   

   olcott to All   

   The correct foundation of the theory of    

   13 Dec 25 10:44:06   

   1k   

   261865   

   dart200 to polcott   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)   

   13 Dec 25 08:01:08   

   6k   

   261864   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Best First Principle of Turing Machine c   

   13 Dec 25 09:50:39   

   2k   

   261863   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   13 Dec 25 09:47:37   

   2k   

   261862   

   polcott to All   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/2)   

   13 Dec 25 07:15:48   

   6k   

   261861   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   13 Dec 25 08:43:27   

   7k   

   261860   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   13 Dec 25 13:05:55   

   7k   

   261859   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   13 Dec 25 12:58:32   

   2k   

   261858   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   13 Dec 25 12:46:10   

   2k   

   261857   

   Mikko to As I already   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   13 Dec 25 12:19:37   

   1,551b   

   261856   

   Mikko to As I already   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   13 Dec 25 12:19:37   

   7k   

   261855   

   polcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 23:10:18   

   6,731b   

   261854   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   13 Dec 25 04:43:25   

   1k   

   261853   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 21:11:35   

   4k   

   261852   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 19:27:06   

   3k   

   261851   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 18:40:07   

   3k   

   261850   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 15:30:18   

   3k   

   261849   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 17:02:02   

   3k   

   261848   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 16:36:34   

   2k   

   261847   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 16:07:18   

   2k   

   261846   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 15:33:49   

   1k   

   261845   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 14:55:22   

   5k   

   261844   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 13:35:17   

   4k   

   261843   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 10:54:06   

   3k   

   261842   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 09:04:26   

   2k   

   261841   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 08:29:38   

   1k   

   261840   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 08:27:41   

   2k   

   261839   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   12 Dec 25 08:19:10   

   6k   

   261838   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   12 Dec 25 13:16:43   

   1k   

   261837   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   12 Dec 25 06:48:14   

   2k   

   261836   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Proof of halting problem category er   

   12 Dec 25 10:56:14   

   2,514b   

   261835   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   12 Dec 25 10:50:14   

   6k   

   261834   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   12 Dec 25 10:46:39   

   3k   

   261833   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   11 Dec 25 19:50:23   

   3,484b   

   261832   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   12 Dec 25 10:27:55   

   4k   

   261831   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   12 Dec 25 10:31:00   

   1k   

   261830   

   olcott to All   

   Proof of halting problem category error    

   11 Dec 25 22:01:49   

   1,223b   

   261829   

   olcott to All   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   11 Dec 25 19:48:49   

   1k   

   261828   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   11 Dec 25 19:44:17   

   3k   

   261827   

   HAL 9000 to polcott   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   12 Dec 25 01:42:41   

   3,373b   

   261826   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   11 Dec 25 19:06:28   

   3k   

   261825   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   11 Dec 25 23:28:16   

   2k   

   261824   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Very simple first principles showing the   

   11 Dec 25 08:38:24   

   2k   

   261823   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Very simple first principles showing the   

   11 Dec 25 08:42:41   

   2k   

   261822   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   11 Dec 25 08:17:40   

   6k   

   261821   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   11 Dec 25 08:15:22   

   3k   

   261820   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   11 Dec 25 07:47:17   

   2k   

   261819   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   11 Dec 25 11:09:26   

   1k   

   261818   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   11 Dec 25 11:00:01   

   1,323b   

   261817   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se   

   11 Dec 25 10:53:36   

   3k   

   261816   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   11 Dec 25 10:42:16   

   5k   

   261815   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   11 Dec 25 10:40:07   

   2k   

   261814   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   10 Dec 25 21:33:33   

   1k   

   261813   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Very simple first principles showing   

   10 Dec 25 20:19:47   

   1,485b   

   261812   

   olcott to All   

   Very simple first principles showing the   

   10 Dec 25 20:00:27   

   1,485b   

   261811   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   10 Dec 25 18:10:12   

   2k   

   261810   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   10 Dec 25 14:01:54   

   2k   

   261809   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   10 Dec 25 10:29:12   

   2k   

   261808   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se   

   10 Dec 25 10:27:45   

   3k   

   261807   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   10 Dec 25 10:14:10   

   2k   

   261806   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   10 Dec 25 08:10:58   

   5k   

   261805   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   10 Dec 25 07:04:13   

   5,207b   

   261804   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   10 Dec 25 12:10:48   

   2k   

   261803   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se   

   10 Dec 25 12:14:43   

   2k   

   261802   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   10 Dec 25 12:04:06   

   2k   

   261801   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   10 Dec 25 11:43:47   

   2,437b   

   261800   

   polcott to polcott   

   Re: This single paragraph proves that th   

   09 Dec 25 17:36:33   

   1k   

   261799   

   polcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   09 Dec 25 12:04:45   

   2k   

   261798   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO   

   09 Dec 25 09:53:11   

   3k   

   261797   

   polcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   09 Dec 25 10:22:53   

   3k   

   261796   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Key new insight into halting undecid   

   09 Dec 25 10:05:23   

   4k   

   261795   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO   

   09 Dec 25 09:39:50   

   3k   

   261794   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   09 Dec 25 15:15:37   

   2k   

   261793   

   dart200 to polcott   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO   

   08 Dec 25 20:54:27   

   1,752b   

   261792   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO   

   08 Dec 25 22:51:37   

   2k   

   261791   

   polcott to All   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO   

   08 Dec 25 23:02:20   

   1k   

   261790   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Key new insight into halting undecid   

   08 Dec 25 22:30:22   

   4k   

   261789   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO   

   08 Dec 25 22:33:16   

   1k   

   261788   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Key new insight into halting undecid   

   08 Dec 25 21:50:55   

   3k   

   261787   

   polcott to All   

   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO   

   08 Dec 25 22:00:50   

   2,966b   

   261786   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: Key new insight into halting undecid   

   08 Dec 25 21:16:55   

   2k   

   261785   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Key new insight into halting undecidabil   

   08 Dec 25 20:34:41   

   1k   

   261784   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   08 Dec 25 19:00:09   

   4k   

   261783   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   08 Dec 25 13:44:50   

   6k   

   261782   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   08 Dec 25 13:56:15   

   6k   

   261781   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   08 Dec 25 13:49:38   

   3k   

   261780   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   08 Dec 25 13:05:36   

   6k   

   261779   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se   

   08 Dec 25 10:39:37   

   2k   

   261778   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   08 Dec 25 13:12:43   

   2k   

   261777   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   08 Dec 25 13:09:41   

   2k   

   261776   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   08 Dec 25 10:41:40   

   1k   

   261775   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se   

   08 Dec 25 13:00:33   

   3k   

   261774   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   08 Dec 25 12:47:20   

   4k   

   261773   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   08 Dec 25 10:25:12   

   2k   

   261772   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   08 Dec 25 10:18:23   

   3k   

   261771   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   08 Dec 25 07:59:02   

   1k   

   261770   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   08 Dec 25 11:13:00   

   2k   

   261769   

   olcott to Mike Terry   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 11:38:42   

   6k   

   261768   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   08 Dec 25 11:18:36   

   5,774b   

   261767   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   08 Dec 25 11:08:14   

   7k   

   261766   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se   

   08 Dec 25 11:04:29   

   2k   

   261765   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   08 Dec 25 07:07:44   

   1k   

   261764   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se   

   08 Dec 25 06:51:28   

   1k   

   261763   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   08 Dec 25 06:36:27   

   1k   

   261762   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   08 Dec 25 06:12:56   

   2k   

   261761   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 21:26:43   

   3k   

   261760   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 21:21:53   

   3,226b   

   261759   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   07 Dec 25 21:17:19   

   3,226b   

   261758   

   olcott to All   

   The Halting Problem violates this self-e   

   07 Dec 25 21:14:39   

   3,226b   

   261757   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   08 Dec 25 02:14:58   

   3,226b   

   261756   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   08 Dec 25 02:04:33   

   1k   

   261755   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   08 Dec 25 01:26:26   

   1k   

   261754   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 17:15:19   

   3k   

   261753   

   HAL 9000 to olcott   

   Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I ha   

   07 Dec 25 18:07:26   

   2k   

   261752   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   07 Dec 25 11:15:26   

   6k   

   261751   

   Mike Terry to Python   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 15:49:54   

   5k   

   261750   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 08:59:06   

   4k   

   261749   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 09:16:22   

   5k   

   261748   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 09:03:31   

   3k   

   261747   

   olcott to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I ha   

   07 Dec 25 08:53:09   

   6k   

   261746   

   olcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 07:37:24   

   1k   

   261745   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   07 Dec 25 14:07:28   

   1k   

   261744   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   07 Dec 25 13:28:43   

   1,039b   

   261743   

   Mikko to Above you   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   07 Dec 25 13:08:41   

   5k   

   261742   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is inc   

   07 Dec 25 13:11:45   

   5,363b   

   261741   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   07 Dec 25 13:02:57   

   2k   

   261740   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   07 Dec 25 12:55:16   

   7k   

   261739   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 12:47:41   

   4k   

   261738   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   07 Dec 25 12:50:18   

   7k   

   261737   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 12:42:45   

   3k   

   261736   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   07 Dec 25 12:39:32   

   4k   

   261735   

   polcott to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   06 Dec 25 21:50:55   

   4k   

   261734   

   olcott to All   

   Halting Problem Proof Counter-Example is   

   06 Dec 25 17:37:07   

   1k   

   261733   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   06 Dec 25 11:29:38   

   1,106b   

   261732   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   06 Dec 25 11:29:38   

   6k   

   261731   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   06 Dec 25 08:41:13   

   6,654b   

   261730   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   06 Dec 25 08:41:13   

   7k   

   261729   

   olcott to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I ha   

   06 Dec 25 10:58:30   

   2k   

   261728   

   olcott to All   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   06 Dec 25 11:00:30   

   2,540b   

   261727   

   olcott to All   

   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the   

   06 Dec 25 11:00:30   

   6k   

   261726   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I ha   

   06 Dec 25 07:49:55   

   2k   

   261725   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   06 Dec 25 06:53:15   

   5k   

   261724   

   HAL 9000 to olcott   

   Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I ha   

   06 Dec 25 13:17:25   

   5,045b   

   261723   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   06 Dec 25 07:14:30   

   2k   

   261722   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   06 Dec 25 13:03:10   

   2k   

   261721   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   06 Dec 25 06:50:22   

   2k   

   261720   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   06 Dec 25 06:46:45   

   6k   

   261719   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   06 Dec 25 06:45:13   

   6k   

   261718   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   06 Dec 25 06:40:21   

   4k   

   261717   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   06 Dec 25 06:33:07   

   4k   

   261716   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   06 Dec 25 06:24:17   

   4k   

   261715   

   olcott to All   

   I am first to have fully refuted the Hal   

   06 Dec 25 06:16:49   

   6k   

   261714   

   olcott to Julio Di Egidio   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Attacking_the_Busy_Beave   

   06 Dec 25 06:19:49   

   1k   

   261713   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   06 Dec 25 06:08:51   

   2k   

   261712   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   06 Dec 25 11:39:45   

   4k   

   261711   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   06 Dec 25 11:23:38   

   1k   

   261710   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   06 Dec 25 11:30:35   

   2k   

   261709   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   06 Dec 25 11:21:20   

   6k   

   261708   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   06 Dec 25 11:19:14   

   7k   

   261707   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   06 Dec 25 11:01:02   

   3k   

   261706   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   06 Dec 25 10:53:41   

   3k   

   261705   

   Julio Di Egidio to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Attacking_the_Busy_Beave   

   06 Dec 25 09:31:35   

   3,334b   

   261704   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   06 Dec 25 10:37:59   

   3k   

   261703   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   06 Dec 25 08:24:56   

   2k   

   261702   

   olcott to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   05 Dec 25 21:18:32   

   2k   

   261701   

   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   05 Dec 25 19:57:10   

   1k   

   261700   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   05 Dec 25 19:53:19   

   6k   

   261699   

   olcott to All   

   Every rebuttal of anything that I have e   

   05 Dec 25 19:38:09   

   6,417b   

   261698   

   olcott to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   05 Dec 25 17:45:14   

   2k   

   261697   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   05 Dec 25 17:03:10   

   6k   

   261696   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   05 Dec 25 16:24:04   

   1k   

   261695   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   The episode told everything about the Ch   

   05 Dec 25 20:10:48   

   3k   

   261694   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   The French Square Wheele Bicycle of Logi   

   05 Dec 25 20:01:26   

   2k   

   261693   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   05 Dec 25 11:43:41   

   2k   

   261692   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   05 Dec 25 11:40:45   

   6k   

   261691   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   05 Dec 25 11:31:22   

   4k   

   261690   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   05 Dec 25 11:30:18   

   3k   

   261689   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   05 Dec 25 11:21:56   

   3k   

   261688   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   05 Dec 25 11:00:56   

   2k   

   261687   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   05 Dec 25 10:41:51   

   3k   

   261686   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   05 Dec 25 10:49:08   

   2k   

   261685   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   05 Dec 25 11:38:11   

   1k   

   261684   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   05 Dec 25 11:13:14   

   7k   

   261683   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   05 Dec 25 11:03:50   

   4k   

   261682   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   05 Dec 25 09:30:02   

   3,989b   

   261681   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   05 Dec 25 10:52:34   

   3k   

   261680   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   05 Dec 25 10:57:50   

   2k   

   261679   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   05 Dec 25 10:48:17   

   3k   

   261678   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   04 Dec 25 08:46:14   

   3k   

   261677   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   04 Dec 25 08:18:23   

   4k   

   261676   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   04 Dec 25 08:15:10   

   1k   

   261675   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   04 Dec 25 08:10:43   

   6k   

   261674   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   04 Dec 25 08:06:48   

   1k   

   261673   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Most generically exactly what is a p   

   04 Dec 25 12:01:21   

   1k   

   261672   

   Mild Shock to All   

   Philosophize not God, Philosophize the D   

   04 Dec 25 11:28:23   

   1,365b   

   261671   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Most generically exactly what is a p   

   04 Dec 25 11:41:40   

   1k   

   261670   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   04 Dec 25 11:17:52   

   1,258b   

   261669   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   04 Dec 25 11:17:52   

   7k   

   261668   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   04 Dec 25 11:17:52   

   7k   

   261667   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   04 Dec 25 11:29:19   

   3k   

   261666   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   04 Dec 25 11:07:05   

   5k   

   261665   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   03 Dec 25 20:39:07   

   1k   

   261664   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   04 Dec 25 02:32:10   

   1k   

   261663   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   03 Dec 25 20:30:43   

   1k   

   261662   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   03 Dec 25 20:07:29   

   1k   

   261661   

   olcott to Andy Walker   

   Olcott is provably correct --- no one ca   

   03 Dec 25 19:50:41   

   2k   

   261660   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   03 Dec 25 19:59:51   

   2,196b   

   261659   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   03 Dec 25 18:24:03   

   5k   

   261658   

   olcott to Richard Heathfield   

   Olcott is provably correct --- no one ca   

   03 Dec 25 19:47:00   

   2k   

   261657   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Olcott is provably correct --- no one ca   

   03 Dec 25 19:44:48   

   2k   

   261656   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Olcott is provably correct --- no on   

   03 Dec 25 18:28:38   

   2k   

   261655   

   olcott to Andy Walker   

   The quality of reviewers on USENET   

   03 Dec 25 18:11:07   

   2k   

   261654   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   03 Dec 25 10:13:53   

   3k   

   261653   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   03 Dec 25 10:27:12   

   1k   

   261652   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   03 Dec 25 10:27:12   

   7k   

   261651   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   03 Dec 25 10:27:12   

   6k   

   261650   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Most generically exactly what is a p   

   03 Dec 25 10:06:12   

   1k   

   261649   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   03 Dec 25 09:59:49   

   3k   

   261648   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   03 Dec 25 10:11:20   

   6k   

   261647   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   03 Dec 25 12:53:17   

   5k   

   261646   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   03 Dec 25 13:34:01   

   7k   

   261645   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   03 Dec 25 13:34:01   

   7k   

   261644   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   03 Dec 25 13:17:20   

   3k   

   261643   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Most generically exactly what is a p   

   03 Dec 25 12:47:42   

   2,824b   

   261642   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   03 Dec 25 12:41:03   

   2k   

   261641   

   x to Julio Di Egidio   

   Re: symbolic logic means nothing nowaday   

   03 Dec 25 02:29:19   

   1,583b   

   261640   

   Mild Shock to Julio Di Egidio   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Attacking_the_Busy_Beaver_5_[1   

   03 Dec 25 09:08:43   

   6k   

   261639   

   Mild Shock to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?The_size_of_a_G=c3=b6del_sente   

   03 Dec 25 08:55:08   

   1k   

   261638   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   What Spock aka Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn   

   03 Dec 25 01:08:12   

   4k   

   261637   

   Mild Shock to olcott   

   Different Hubble Theories: de Sitter Ene   

   03 Dec 25 01:04:16   

   3k   

   261636   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   BB(5) also used proof theoretic methods    

   03 Dec 25 00:19:52   

   3k   

   261635   

   olcott to Mild Shock   

   BB(googolplex ^ googolplex) ???   

   02 Dec 25 17:51:07   

   2k   

   261634   

   Mild Shock to olcott   

   Pot Head Olcott: BB(5) is only S(5)=47,1   

   03 Dec 25 00:42:18   

   2k   

   261633   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency -   

   02 Dec 25 17:32:51   

   1k   

   261632   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   productivity is a principle for coinduct   

   03 Dec 25 00:26:55   

   3k   

   261631   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (   

   02 Dec 25 15:13:10   

   3,582b   

   261630   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (   

   02 Dec 25 17:05:50   

   3,582b   

   261629   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   02 Dec 25 08:14:13   

   7k   

   261628   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   02 Dec 25 08:14:13   

   6k   

   261627   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   02 Dec 25 09:26:39   

   2k   

   261626   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   02 Dec 25 07:22:50   

   2k   

   261625   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   02 Dec 25 08:00:35   

   3k   

   261624   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   02 Dec 25 08:07:19   

   3k   

   261623   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   02 Dec 25 11:07:08   

   6k   

   261622   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   02 Dec 25 11:07:08   

   7k   

   261621   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   02 Dec 25 11:56:12   

   2k   

   261620   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   02 Dec 25 11:26:29   

   2k   

   261619   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Most generically exactly what is a p   

   02 Dec 25 11:15:29   

   1,580b   

   261618   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   02 Dec 25 11:49:39   

   1k   

   261617   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   02 Dec 25 10:53:07   

   1k   

   261616   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   01 Dec 25 20:01:19   

   3k   

   261615   

   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   02 Dec 25 01:59:37   

   1k   

   261614   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   01 Dec 25 19:50:55   

   4k   

   261613   

   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   02 Dec 25 01:39:18   

   3k   

   261612   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 16:41:45   

   2,567b   

   261611   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   02 Dec 25 01:13:51   

   2k   

   261610   

   Mild Shock to Jeff Barnett   

   Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth bus   

   02 Dec 25 00:14:18   

   3k   

   261609   

   Jeff Barnett to All   

   Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth bus   

   01 Dec 25 14:29:19   

   2,780b   

   261608   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   01 Dec 25 11:04:30   

   2k   

   261607   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   01 Dec 25 17:37:05   

   3k   

   261606   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   01 Dec 25 13:44:13   

   4k   

   261605   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   01 Dec 25 11:15:11   

   1k   

   261604   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 10:27:34   

   5k   

   261603   

   Tristan Wibberley to dbush   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   01 Dec 25 16:55:26   

   2k   

   261602   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 09:39:31   

   4k   

   261601   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 09:55:53   

   4k   

   261600   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 09:29:48   

   3k   

   261599   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 09:19:35   

   2k   

   261598   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 09:26:00   

   3k   

   261597   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   01 Dec 25 09:18:03   

   2k   

   261596   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 08:57:17   

   2k   

   261595   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   01 Dec 25 14:45:27   

   1k   

   261594   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 08:38:47   

   1k   

   261593   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 06:47:03   

   6k   

   261592   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 06:47:03   

   6k   

   261591   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: on deciding this sentence is false   

   01 Dec 25 06:43:36   

   1k   

   261590   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Olcott is provably correct   

   01 Dec 25 06:22:28   

   2k   

   261589   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Olcott is provably correct --- no on   

   01 Dec 25 06:41:05   

   2k   

   261588   

   olcott to All   

   Most generically exactly what is a proof   

   01 Dec 25 06:27:20   

   1,779b   

   261587   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   01 Dec 25 06:19:53   

   2k   

   261586   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 12:45:00   

   5k   

   261585   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   01 Dec 25 12:45:00   

   7k   

   261584   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   Wake-up call until everybody gets ear-bl   

   01 Dec 25 12:00:44   

   2k   

   261583   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   01 Dec 25 13:02:52   

   2,138b   

   261582   

   Mild Shock to Julio Di Egidio   

   What is analog computing nowadays? (Was:   

   01 Dec 25 11:24:06   

   2k   

   261581   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: on deciding this sentence is false   

   01 Dec 25 11:42:54   

   1,724b   

   261580   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Olcott is provably correct --- no on   

   01 Dec 25 11:39:12   

   1,724b   

   261579   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: Olcott is provably correct --- no on   

   01 Dec 25 05:34:39   

   2k   

   261578   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Olcott is provably correct   

   01 Dec 25 11:31:24   

   2k   

   261577   

   Julio Di Egidio to Mild Shock   

   Re: symbolic logic means nothing nowaday   

   30 Nov 25 23:17:11   

   1,892b   

   261576   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Olcott is provably correct --- no on   

   30 Nov 25 20:12:59   

   2k   

   261575   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: Olcott is provably correct   

   01 Dec 25 01:44:55   

   1k   

   261574   

   Mild Shock to All   

   symbolic logic means nothing nowadays (W   

   30 Nov 25 22:21:46   

   1,247b   

   261573   

   Ross Finlayson to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   30 Nov 25 10:33:00   

   1,247b   

   261572   

   olcott to All   

   Olcott is provably correct   

   30 Nov 25 10:52:15   

   2k   

   261571   

   Julio Di Egidio to Rich D   

   The rational reasoner   

   30 Nov 25 16:16:30   

   4k   

   261570   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   The entire body of general knowledge tha   

   30 Nov 25 09:58:42   

   3k   

   261569   

   Mild Shock to All   

   Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy be   

   30 Nov 25 13:36:52   

   2k   

   261568   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   When put in virtual jail, ask for remova   

   30 Nov 25 12:55:11   

   5k   

   261567   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   30 Nov 25 12:19:00   

   4k   

   261566   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   How to get GigaLIPS for Transitive Closu   

   30 Nov 25 11:20:09   

   5k   

   261565   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   30 Nov 25 12:14:30   

   7k   

   261564   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   30 Nov 25 12:07:35   

   6k   

   261563   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   30 Nov 25 11:58:51   

   4k   

   261562   

   Mild Shock to Julio Di Egidio   

   SWI Agent Provocateur gets kicked out of   

   30 Nov 25 10:28:04   

   3k   

   261561   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   30 Nov 25 11:22:00   

   5k   

   261560   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   30 Nov 25 11:16:06   

   1k   

   261559   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   30 Nov 25 11:12:46   

   2k   

   261558   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   30 Nov 25 11:10:29   

   3k   

   261557   

   Julio Di Egidio to Julio Di Egidio   

   Re: Coq/Rocq and how to completely break   

   30 Nov 25 10:00:15   

   3k   

   261556   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Compete finite set of axioms of gene   

   30 Nov 25 00:46:20   

   2,707b   

   261555   

   Julio Di Egidio to Julio Di Egidio   

   Re: Coq/Rocq and how to completely break   

   30 Nov 25 09:52:14   

   2k   

   261554   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: Compete finite set of axioms of gene   

   30 Nov 25 06:40:07   

   2,141b   

   261553   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Compete finite set of axioms of gene   

   29 Nov 25 22:43:31   

   6k   

   261552   

   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Compete finite set of axioms of gene   

   29 Nov 25 22:43:48   

   5,704b   

   261551   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Compete finite set of axioms of gene   

   29 Nov 25 20:22:24   

   5k   

   261550   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 19:50:26   

   5,115b   

   261549   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 15:20:29   

   5,115b   

   261548   

   olcott to Mike Terry   

   The body of knowledge expressed in langu   

   29 Nov 25 21:17:53   

   6k   

   261547   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 19:49:14   

   2k   

   261546   

   olcott to All   

   Compete finite set of axioms of general    

   29 Nov 25 19:50:36   

   5k   

   261545   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 16:35:13   

   1k   

   261544   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 15:53:03   

   2k   

   261543   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 17:24:22   

   2k   

   261542   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 17:19:39   

   3k   

   261541   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 22:57:29   

   2k   

   261540   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 22:44:10   

   5k   

   261539   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Is Goldbach conjecture a NPC problem   

   29 Nov 25 16:30:43   

   4k   

   261538   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Mikko   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   29 Nov 25 14:37:50   

   1k   

   261537   

   dart200 to Richard Damon   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 14:16:44   

   2k   

   261536   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 16:01:44   

   2k   

   261535   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 17:04:59   

   6k   

   261534   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 15:59:00   

   5k   

   261533   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: on deciding this sentence is false   

   29 Nov 25 15:46:38   

   5k   

   261532   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 21:53:57   

   2k   

   261531   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 15:31:26   

   4k   

   261530   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 15:31:26   

   6k   

   261529   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 21:39:23   

   4k   

   261528   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 14:56:46   

   2k   

   261527   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 14:56:46   

   6k   

   261526   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 14:51:11   

   3k   

   261525   

   Alan Mackenzie to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 20:48:31   

   2k   

   261524   

   Alan Mackenzie to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 20:48:31   

   7k   

   261523   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 20:39:27   

   7k   

   261522   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 20:23:52   

   2k   

   261521   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   29 Nov 25 14:58:09   

   6k   

   261520   

   olcott to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 13:33:25   

   5k   

   261519   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   29 Nov 25 13:16:23   

   3k   

   261518   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   29 Nov 25 11:00:49   

   3k   

   261517   

   olcott to All   

   Re: on "Nothing is final"   

   29 Nov 25 13:00:02   

   3k   

   261516   

   dart200 to Mikko   

   on "Nothing is final"   

   29 Nov 25 10:53:14   

   2k   

   261515   

   dbush to olcott   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 13:19:49   

   2,427b   

   261514   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: A new category of thought   

   29 Nov 25 12:07:37   

   2k   

   261513   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   29 Nov 25 12:01:47   

   4k   

   261512   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   29 Nov 25 10:45:04   

   6k   

   261511   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 11:57:01   

   3k   

   261510   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 11:54:09   

   5k   

   261509   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: on deciding this sentence is false   

   29 Nov 25 10:59:19   

   1k   

   261508   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   29 Nov 25 10:40:33   

   6k   

   261507   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   29 Nov 25 10:42:48   

   4k   

   261506   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   29 Nov 25 10:38:26   

   5k   

   261505   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   29 Nov 25 10:38:26   

   6k   

   261504   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   29 Nov 25 10:10:24   

   2k   

   261503   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 08:20:43   

   2k   

   261502   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 08:20:43   

   6k   

   261501   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   29 Nov 25 10:04:14   

   3k   

   261500   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 09:18:26   

   6k   

   261499   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 08:43:16   

   2k   

   261498   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   6k   

   261497   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261496   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261495   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261494   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261493   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261492   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261491   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261490   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261489   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261488   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261487   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261486   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261485   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261484   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261483   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261482   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261481   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261480   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261479   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261478   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261477   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261476   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261475   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261474   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261473   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261472   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261471   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261470   

   Ross Finlayson to And you   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:23   

   7k   

   261469   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7,579b   

   261468   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261467   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261466   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261465   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261464   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261463   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261462   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261461   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261460   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261459   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261458   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261457   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261456   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261455   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261454   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261453   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   29 Nov 25 03:54:06   

   7k   

   261452   

   Alan Mackenzie to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 11:55:14   

   4k   

   261451   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   29 Nov 25 12:31:21   

   3k   

   261450   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 12:17:43   

   4k   

   261449   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   29 Nov 25 12:20:25   

   3k   

   261448   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   29 Nov 25 11:48:00   

   5k   

   261447   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   29 Nov 25 11:40:59   

   4k   

   261446   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   29 Nov 25 11:44:50   

   6k   

   261445   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: on deciding this sentence is false   

   29 Nov 25 11:51:50   

   6,504b   

   261444   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   29 Nov 25 11:27:32   

   5k   

   261443   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   29 Nov 25 11:27:32   

   7k   

   261442   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   29 Nov 25 10:55:46   

   2k   

   261441   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   29 Nov 25 11:06:27   

   1k   

   261440   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   29 Nov 25 10:48:04   

   2k   

   261439   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 05:52:41   

   6k   

   261438   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   28 Nov 25 23:05:02   

   5k   

   261437   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   28 Nov 25 21:25:06   

   4k   

   261436   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 04:17:13   

   4k   

   261435   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi   

   29 Nov 25 02:58:58   

   3k   

   261434   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   28 Nov 25 17:28:18   

   2,589b   

   261433   

   Chris M. Thomasson to FromTheRafters   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   28 Nov 25 17:06:11   

   2k   

   261432   

   Chris M. Thomasson to FromTheRafters   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   28 Nov 25 16:57:32   

   2k   

   261431   

   FromTheRafters to All   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   28 Nov 25 19:49:14   

   2k   

   261430   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   28 Nov 25 16:31:58   

   1k   

   261429   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   28 Nov 25 16:43:44   

   1,070b   

   261428   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   28 Nov 25 16:42:40   

   2k   

   261427   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   28 Nov 25 15:58:44   

   1,835b   

   261426   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   28 Nov 25 17:14:05   

   5k   

   261425   

   Alan Mackenzie to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   28 Nov 25 22:54:20   

   4k   

   261424   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   A new foundation for correct reasoning +   

   28 Nov 25 16:03:01   

   3k   

   261423   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   28 Nov 25 13:21:34   

   3k   

   261422   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   28 Nov 25 12:40:25   

   2k   

   261421   

   Alan Mackenzie to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   28 Nov 25 18:51:58   

   2k   

   261420   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   28 Nov 25 10:59:44   

   6k   

   261419   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: on deciding this sentence is false   

   28 Nov 25 12:20:28   

   2k   

   261418   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   28 Nov 25 12:10:25   

   2k   

   261417   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   28 Nov 25 17:22:02   

   2k   

   261416   

   Alan Mackenzie to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   28 Nov 25 17:32:27   

   1,826b   

   261415   

   dart200 to Mikko   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   28 Nov 25 09:29:33   

   2k   

   261414   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   28 Nov 25 09:51:02   

   5k   

   261413   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   28 Nov 25 09:54:05   

   3k   

   261412   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   28 Nov 25 09:21:03   

   3k   

   261411   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   28 Nov 25 09:16:59   

   6k   

   261410   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   28 Nov 25 09:18:39   

   5k   

   261409   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   28 Nov 25 08:52:48   

   6k   

   261408   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   28 Nov 25 08:54:28   

   4k   

   261407   

   polcott to Mikko   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   28 Nov 25 08:03:52   

   2k   

   261406   

   olcott to Mikko   

   The halting problem is incorrect two dif   

   28 Nov 25 08:46:06   

   5k   

   261405   

   olcott to Mikko   

   The halting problem is incorrect two dif   

   28 Nov 25 08:46:06   

   6k   

   261404   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   28 Nov 25 10:40:36   

   3k   

   261403   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   28 Nov 25 11:01:55   

   3k   

   261402   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   28 Nov 25 10:58:46   

   4k   

   261401   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   28 Nov 25 10:36:00   

   5k   

   261400   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   28 Nov 25 10:35:03   

   6k   

   261399   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   28 Nov 25 10:29:05   

   3k   

   261398   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   28 Nov 25 10:18:38   

   7k   

   261397   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   28 Nov 25 10:14:21   

   3k   

   261396   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   28 Nov 25 10:14:21   

   7k   

   261395   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   27 Nov 25 21:51:20   

   1k   

   261394   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   27 Nov 25 21:51:20   

   7k   

   261393   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   27 Nov 25 21:51:20   

   7k   

   261392   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   27 Nov 25 21:51:20   

   7k   

   261391   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   27 Nov 25 21:51:20   

   7k   

   261390   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   27 Nov 25 21:51:20   

   7k   

   261389   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m   

   27 Nov 25 21:51:20   

   7k   

   261388   

   Ross Finlayson to The Starmaker   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/3   

   27 Nov 25 22:07:06   

   7k   

   261387   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   28 Nov 25 10:06:57   

   1k   

   261386   

   Kaz Kylheku to Richard Damon   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   27 Nov 25 18:37:09   

   2k   

   261385   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   27 Nov 25 18:07:33   

   2,438b   

   261384   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   27 Nov 25 18:24:07   

   1k   

   261383   

   olcott to olcott   

   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   27 Nov 25 10:28:54   

   1k   

   261382   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   27 Nov 25 09:43:43   

   3k   

   261381   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   27 Nov 25 09:48:17   

   3k   

   261380   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   27 Nov 25 09:31:53   

   4k   

   261379   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   27 Nov 25 09:21:37   

   6k   

   261378   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   27 Nov 25 09:17:55   

   3k   

   261377   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   27 Nov 25 09:16:05   

   6k   

   261376   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   27 Nov 25 08:59:41   

   2k   

   261375   

   olcott to All   

   Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox   

   27 Nov 25 08:36:42   

   1k   

   261374   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   An NPU could give 1000x more LIPS (An NP   

   27 Nov 25 14:21:39   

   3k   

   261373   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   27 Nov 25 09:30:16   

   5k   

   261372   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Mikko   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   27 Nov 25 00:39:24   

   5,513b   

   261371   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   27 Nov 25 10:22:40   

   5,513b   

   261370   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   27 Nov 25 10:17:10   

   3k   

   261369   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   27 Nov 25 10:00:46   

   2k   

   261368   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 23:58:17   

   3k   

   261367   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 23:58:17   

   7k   

   261366   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   27 Nov 25 09:56:58   

   3k   

   261365   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   27 Nov 25 09:49:55   

   2k   

   261364   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   27 Nov 25 09:49:55   

   7k   

   261363   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   27 Nov 25 09:40:11   

   2k   

   261362   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 22:18:43   

   1k   

   261361   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 23:00:01   

   4k   

   261360   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   27 Nov 25 06:51:01   

   4k   

   261359   

   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   26 Nov 25 22:33:22   

   4,275b   

   261358   

   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 22:16:56   

   1k   

   261357   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/3   

   26 Nov 25 22:16:14   

   2k   

   261356   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/3   

   26 Nov 25 22:16:14   

   7k   

   261355   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/3   

   26 Nov 25 22:16:14   

   7k   

   261354   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Heathfield   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 22:15:45   

   6,671b   

   261353   

   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 22:14:11   

   1k   

   261352   

   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 21:59:44   

   1,039b   

   261351   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 22:01:30   

   1k   

   261350   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 21:58:44   

   2k   

   261349   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 21:56:41   

   2k   

   261348   

   Ross Finlayson to The Starmaker   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/3   

   26 Nov 25 20:56:42   

   4k   

   261347   

   Ross Finlayson to The Starmaker   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/3   

   26 Nov 25 20:56:42   

   7k   

   261346   

   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 21:54:33   

   2k   

   261345   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 22:31:19   

   2k   

   261344   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 22:39:52   

   1k   

   261343   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   27 Nov 25 04:15:19   

   1k   

   261342   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   27 Nov 25 04:19:06   

   1,498b   

   261341   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 19:43:46   

   5k   

   261340   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 20:05:26   

   4,963b   

   261339   

   polcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 22:10:49   

   5k   

   261338   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 20:03:52   

   4,693b   

   261337   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 19:36:50   

   4k   

   261336   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 20:26:47   

   5k   

   261335   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 20:37:18   

   5k   

   261334   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 19:47:15   

   4k   

   261333   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 19:42:02   

   4k   

   261332   

   dbush to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 20:02:34   

   3k   

   261331   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 18:51:19   

   3k   

   261330   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   27 Nov 25 00:39:26   

   4k   

   261329   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 18:20:03   

   3k   

   261328   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/3   

   26 Nov 25 15:15:33   

   1k   

   261327   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/3   

   26 Nov 25 15:15:33   

   7k   

   261326   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/3   

   26 Nov 25 15:15:33   

   7k   

   261325   

   dbush to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 18:00:03   

   2k   

   261324   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 23:55:50   

   2k   

   261323   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 16:48:49   

   2k   

   261322   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 22:19:42   

   2k   

   261321   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   26 Nov 25 15:50:07   

   1,539b   

   261320   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   26 Nov 25 15:54:59   

   1,539b   

   261319   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/3   

   26 Nov 25 14:15:35   

   1k   

   261318   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/3   

   26 Nov 25 14:15:35   

   7k   

   261317   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/3   

   26 Nov 25 14:15:35   

   7k   

   261316   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 15:53:05   

   1k   

   261315   

   Kaz Kylheku to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   26 Nov 25 21:49:38   

   1,396b   

   261314   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   26 Nov 25 21:42:50   

   1,396b   

   261313   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   26 Nov 25 14:04:02   

   1k   

   261312   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   26 Nov 25 14:07:35   

   1,293b   

   261311   

   dbush to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 14:58:53   

   1,293b   

   261310   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 13:55:13   

   1k   

   261309   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   26 Nov 25 19:46:27   

   1k   

   261308   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   26 Nov 25 19:43:16   

   1k   

   261307   

   Tristan Wibberley to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 19:34:08   

   1k   

   261306   

   dbush to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 14:40:47   

   1,295b   

   261305   

   Tristan Wibberley to Chris M. Thomasson   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 19:23:10   

   1k   

   261304   

   Tristan Wibberley to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 19:16:59   

   1,287b   

   261303   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/2   

   26 Nov 25 10:58:47   

   2k   

   261302   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   26 Nov 25 09:39:06   

   3k   

   261301   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 18:35:43   

   2,843b   

   261300   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   26 Nov 25 09:54:28   

   3k   

   261299   

   Richard Damon to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 10:29:37   

   2k   

   261298   

   dbush to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 10:20:30   

   2k   

   261297   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   26 Nov 25 09:20:24   

   3k   

   261296   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 09:15:47   

   3k   

   261295   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 09:13:19   

   5k   

   261294   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 09:17:29   

   2k   

   261293   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 09:17:29   

   6k   

   261292   

   dbush to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 10:04:54   

   1k   

   261291   

   Mild Shock to Kaz Kylheku   

   The Implicit Mechanism of Attention (sic   

   26 Nov 25 14:11:05   

   1k   

   261290   

   dbush to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 10:06:37   

   1k   

   261289   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 08:58:39   

   5k   

   261288   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 08:53:53   

   1k   

   261287   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 08:44:50   

   6k   

   261286   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 11:03:14   

   2k   

   261285   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   26 Nov 25 12:17:45   

   2k   

   261284   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   26 Nov 25 13:37:05   

   2k   

   261283   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 12:01:28   

   1k   

   261282   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   26 Nov 25 12:01:28   

   7k   

   261281   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 11:22:06   

   2k   

   261280   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 11:05:29   

   4k   

   261279   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 10:50:05   

   2k   

   261278   

   Richard Heathfield to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 05:53:21   

   2,336b   

   261277   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 05:18:35   

   2,336b   

   261276   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:30:21   

   2,336b   

   261275   

   Kaz Kylheku to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 05:16:19   

   2k   

   261274   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:11:18   

   7k   

   261273   

   dart200 to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:55:19   

   2k   

   261272   

   dart200 to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:56:18   

   1,881b   

   261271   

   dart200 to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:23:25   

   1,881b   

   261270   

   dart200 to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:22:01   

   1k   

   261269   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 22:18:14   

   1k   

   261268   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 22:06:28   

   3k   

   261267   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 22:01:32   

   4k   

   261266   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:50:05   

   2k   

   261265   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:45:35   

   2k   

   261264   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:33:51   

   1k   

   261263   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:32:51   

   2k   

   261262   

   olcott to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:30:31   

   2k   

   261261   

   Kaz Kylheku to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 03:30:05   

   1k   

   261260   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:28:18   

   1,280b   

   261259   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 03:27:21   

   1k   

   261258   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 03:26:08   

   2k   

   261257   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:22:58   

   2k   

   261256   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:24:33   

   4k   

   261255   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 19:22:46   

   1k   

   261254   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:21:47   

   1k   

   261253   

   Kaz Kylheku to All   

   Hey look, Mentifex passed away in 2004   

   26 Nov 25 03:20:21   

   1,339b   

   261252   

   olcott to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:19:45   

   1k   

   261251   

   Kaz Kylheku to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 03:19:03   

   1,324b   

   261250   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:17:15   

   2k   

   261249   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 03:16:23   

   2,177b   

   261248   

   dart200 to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 19:16:08   

   4k   

   261247   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 03:09:39   

   2k   

   261246   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:11:13   

   1,691b   

   261245   

   dart200 to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 19:08:53   

   1k   

   261244   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:06:18   

   1k   

   261243   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 21:01:34   

   6k   

   261242   

   olcott to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:59:39   

   4k   

   261241   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:46:35   

   5k   

   261240   

   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 19:45:25   

   4k   

   261239   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:45:04   

   3,685b   

   261238   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:43:59   

   1k   

   261237   

   olcott to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:41:49   

   3k   

   261236   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 02:36:46   

   3,574b   

   261235   

   dart200 to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 18:38:16   

   2k   

   261234   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:37:46   

   2,311b   

   261233   

   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 19:36:18   

   3k   

   261232   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:36:02   

   3k   

   261231   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 02:34:46   

   3,416b   

   261230   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:34:09   

   4k   

   261229   

   olcott to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:30:16   

   3k   

   261228   

   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 19:12:04   

   2k   

   261227   

   olcott to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:08:43   

   2k   

   261226   

   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 19:00:10   

   2k   

   261225   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 20:03:07   

   2k   

   261224   

   olcott to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 19:43:11   

   3k   

   261223   

   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 18:29:32   

   1k   

   261222   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 19:19:09   

   2k   

   261221   

   dart200 to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 17:09:05   

   7k   

   261220   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 18:52:59   

   1k   

   261219   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   26 Nov 25 00:47:54   

   1,407b   

   261218   

   olcott to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 18:40:26   

   6k   

   261217   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 18:38:21   

   5k   

   261216   

   dart200 to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 16:29:01   

   7k   

   261215   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 18:14:12   

   2k   

   261214   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 18:00:39   

   6k   

   261213   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 17:21:43   

   6k   

   261212   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 13:30:43   

   6,642b   

   261211   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 13:27:08   

   7k   

   261210   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 15:27:05   

   6k   

   261209   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 15:09:02   

   6k   

   261208   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Olcott creates a new foundation for auto   

   25 Nov 25 13:22:21   

   6,612b   

   261207   

   olcott to Python   

   Re: New formal foundation for correct re   

   25 Nov 25 15:01:01   

   6k   

   261206   

   olcott to All   

   New formal foundation for correct reason   

   25 Nov 25 14:20:48   

   2k   

   261205   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   25 Nov 25 08:21:49   

   2k   

   261204   

   polcott to olcott   

   Re: Transforming Logic into a system of    

   25 Nov 25 13:06:24   

   1,767b   

   261203   

   olcott to All   

   Transforming Logic into a system of corr   

   24 Nov 25 09:47:32   

   1,767b   

   261202   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   

   25 Nov 25 11:40:54   

   1,767b   

   261201   

   olcott to All   

   A new foundation for correct reasoning   

   24 Nov 25 18:53:47   

   1,767b   

   261200   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: halting problem counter example H/D    

   23 Nov 25 04:11:47   

   1k   

   261199   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: halting problem counter example H/D    

   22 Nov 25 07:16:25   

   1k   

   261198   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: halting problem counter example H/D    

   22 Nov 25 11:14:05   

   2k   

   261197   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: halting problem counter example H/D    

   22 Nov 25 17:44:48   

   3k   

   261196   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   4k   

   261195   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   7k   

   261194   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   7k   

   261193   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   7k   

   261192   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   7k   

   261191   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   7k   

   261190   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   7k   

   261189   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   7k   

   261188   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   7k   

   261187   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   7k   

   261186   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   7k   

   261185   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   22 Nov 25 00:28:18   

   7k   

   261184   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261183   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261182   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261181   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261180   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261179   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261178   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261177   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261176   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261175   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261174   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261173   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:56:48   

   7k   

   261172   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   5k   

   261171   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   7k   

   261170   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   7k   

   261169   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   7k   

   261168   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   7k   

   261167   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   7k   

   261166   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   7k   

   261165   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   7k   

   261164   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   7k   

   261163   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   7k   

   261162   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   7k   

   261161   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:54:34   

   7k   

   261160   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:52:17   

   3k   

   261159   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:52:17   

   7k   

   261158   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:52:17   

   7k   

   261157   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:52:17   

   7k   

   261156   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:52:17   

   7k   

   261155   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:52:17   

   7k   

   261154   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:47:36   

   2k   

   261153   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:47:36   

   7k   

   261152   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:47:36   

   7k   

   261151   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:47:36   

   7k   

   261150   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:47:36   

   7k   

   261149   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:47:36   

   7k   

   261148   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:47:36   

   7k   

   261147   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen   

   21 Nov 25 22:47:36   

   7k   

   261146   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (5/5   

   21 Nov 25 22:06:23   

   1k   

   261145   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/5   

   21 Nov 25 22:06:23   

   7k   

   261144   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/5   

   21 Nov 25 22:06:23   

   7k   

   261143   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/5   

   21 Nov 25 22:06:23   

   7k   

   261142   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/5   

   21 Nov 25 22:06:23   

   7k   

   261141   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li   

   20 Nov 25 22:00:20   

   1k   

   261140   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: halting problem counter example H/D    

   22 Nov 25 04:26:17   

   1k   

   261139   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li   

   21 Nov 25 13:50:02   

   1,180b   

   261138   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/4   

   21 Nov 25 11:31:13   

   6k   

   261137   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/4   

   21 Nov 25 11:31:13   

   7k   

   261136   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/4   

   21 Nov 25 11:31:13   

   7k   

   261135   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/4   

   21 Nov 25 10:39:18   

   6k   

   261134   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/4   

   21 Nov 25 10:39:18   

   7k   

   261133   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/4   

   21 Nov 25 10:39:18   

   7k   

   261132   

   olcott to All   

   Making True(Language L, Expression E) al   

   21 Nov 25 09:09:37   

   3k   

   261131   

   olcott to All   

   Making True(Language L, Expression E) al   

   21 Nov 25 09:09:37   

   6k   

   261130   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: halting problem shows that "true on    

   21 Nov 25 09:23:09   

   3k   

   261129   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Mike Terry   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   20 Nov 25 18:10:23   

   2k   

   261128   

   Tristan Wibberley to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li   

   21 Nov 25 01:28:24   

   2k   

   261127   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (11/   

   20 Nov 25 13:10:00   

   7k   

   261126   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (10/   

   20 Nov 25 13:10:00   

   7k   

   261125   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (9/1   

   20 Nov 25 13:10:00   

   7k   

   261124   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (8/1   

   20 Nov 25 13:10:00   

   7k   

   261123   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (7/1   

   20 Nov 25 13:10:00   

   7k   

   261122   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (6/1   

   20 Nov 25 13:10:00   

   7k   

   261121   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (5/1   

   20 Nov 25 13:10:00   

   7k   

   261120   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/1   

   20 Nov 25 13:10:00   

   7k   

   261119   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/1   

   20 Nov 25 13:10:00   

   7k   

   261118   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/1   

   20 Nov 25 13:10:00   

   7k   

   261117   

   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/1   

   20 Nov 25 13:10:00   

   7k   

   261116   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i   

   20 Nov 25 14:56:01   

   2k   

   261115   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li   

   21 Nov 25 01:14:49   

   1k   

   261114   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i   

   20 Nov 25 22:10:07   

   2k   

   261113   

   Kaz Kylheku to user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   20 Nov 25 22:06:10   

   2k   

   261112   

   dart200 to Richard Heathfield   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   20 Nov 25 13:35:46   

   2k   

   261111   

   dart200 to Mike Terry   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   20 Nov 25 13:50:07   

   3k   

   261110   

   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott   

   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i   

   20 Nov 25 13:22:18   

   3,204b   

   261109   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li   

   20 Nov 25 20:49:03   

   1k   

   261108   

   Mike Terry to All   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   20 Nov 25 20:53:19   

   6k   

   261107   

   Richard Heathfield to Mike Terry   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   20 Nov 25 21:09:50   

   6,238b   

   261106   

   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   20 Nov 25 20:24:10   

   4k   

   261105   

   Kaz Kylheku to user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   20 Nov 25 19:55:55   

   2k   

   261104   

   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   20 Nov 25 12:03:05   

   3k   

   261103   

   J. J. Lodder to Python   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic"   

   20 Nov 25 12:41:36   

   2,747b   

   261102   

   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   20 Nov 25 07:22:33   

   1k   

   261101   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li   

   19 Nov 25 21:24:46   

   4k   

   261100   

   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox   

   19 Nov 25 21:01:34   

   4k   

   261099   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i   

   19 Nov 25 22:57:20   

   1k   

   261098   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i   

   20 Nov 25 04:42:48   

   1,257b   

   261097   

   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   19 Nov 25 19:53:42   

   2k   

   261096   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i   

   19 Nov 25 21:12:21   

   2,309b   

   261095   

   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   19 Nov 25 18:49:50   

   1k   

   261094   

   Kaz Kylheku to user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   

   Re: homework assignment for the group: m   

   20 Nov 25 02:29:53   

   1k   

   261093   

   dart200 to Mike Terry   

   homework assignment for the group: multi   

   19 Nov 25 18:08:23   

   5k   

   261092   

   Mike Terry to Jeff Barnett   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   20 Nov 25 00:04:27   

   5k   

   261091   

   olcott to Jeff Barnett   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   19 Nov 25 17:43:09   

   5k   

   261090   

   Jeff Barnett to All   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   19 Nov 25 16:04:33   

   4,913b   

   261089   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   19 Nov 25 13:03:11   

   3k   

   261088   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i   

   19 Nov 25 15:05:56   

   2k   

   261087   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li   

   19 Nov 25 20:55:50   

   7k   

   261086   

   Chris M. Thomasson to Mike Terry   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   19 Nov 25 12:51:02   

   4k   

   261085   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i   

   19 Nov 25 20:55:43   

   3,816b   

   261084   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox -   

   19 Nov 25 14:49:50   

   3k   

   261083   

   J. J. Lodder to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic"   

   19 Nov 25 21:48:01   

   3,116b   

   261082   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li   

   19 Nov 25 14:22:37   

   4k   

   261081   

   Mike Terry to All   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   19 Nov 25 19:42:10   

   3k   

   261080   

   Kaz Kylheku to user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   

   Re: help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox   

   19 Nov 25 19:47:50   

   3k   

   261079   

   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox   

   19 Nov 25 11:19:13   

   3k   

   261078   

   Mild Shock to The Starmaker   

   Finalysons Black Hole spotted (Re: "The    

   19 Nov 25 20:02:32   

   2,598b   

   261077   

   Mild Shock to Ross Finlayson   

   Read more books, Rossy Boy (Was: What we   

   19 Nov 25 19:53:24   

   1k   

   261076   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li   

   19 Nov 25 18:51:48   

   3k   

   261075   

   Kaz Kylheku to user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   

   Re: help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox   

   19 Nov 25 18:48:44   

   2k   

   261074   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (11/   

   19 Nov 25 10:10:06   

   5k   

   261073   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (10/   

   19 Nov 25 10:10:06   

   7k   

   261072   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (9/1   

   19 Nov 25 10:10:06   

   7k   

   261071   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (8/1   

   19 Nov 25 10:10:06   

   7k   

   261070   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (7/1   

   19 Nov 25 10:10:06   

   7k   

   261069   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (6/1   

   19 Nov 25 10:10:06   

   7k   

   261068   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (5/1   

   19 Nov 25 10:10:06   

   7k   

   261067   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/1   

   19 Nov 25 10:10:06   

   7k   

   261066   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/1   

   19 Nov 25 10:10:06   

   7k   

   261065   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/1   

   19 Nov 25 10:10:06   

   7k   

   261064   

   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/1   

   19 Nov 25 10:10:06   

   7k   

   261063   

   dart200 to Tristan Wibberley   

   help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox   

   19 Nov 25 10:43:08   

   2k   

   261062   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   19 Nov 25 12:39:51   

   2k   

   261061   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   polcott agrees the halting problem is in   

   19 Nov 25 12:37:35   

   3k   

   261060   

   Kaz Kylheku to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   19 Nov 25 18:31:08   

   2k   

   261059   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   19 Nov 25 18:23:19   

   2k   

   261058   

   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   19 Nov 25 17:57:49   

   2k   

   261057   

   dart200 to Mike Terry   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   19 Nov 25 10:26:18   

   2k   

   261056   

   Kaz Kylheku to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   19 Nov 25 17:48:26   

   1k   

   261055   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   19 Nov 25 17:40:17   

   1k   

   261054   

   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   19 Nov 25 17:41:56   

   3k   

   261053   

   Tristan Wibberley to All   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   19 Nov 25 17:17:42   

   1k   

   261052   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   19 Nov 25 11:04:36   

   2k   

   261051   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   19 Nov 25 11:10:30   

   2k   

   261050   

   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   19 Nov 25 16:35:44   

   1k   

   261049   

   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   19 Nov 25 16:28:25   

   2k   

   261048   

   J. J. Lodder to mlwozniak@wp.pl   

   Re: Teach Logic: Do Non-Wellfounded Proo   

   19 Nov 25 14:18:15   

   2k   

   261047   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   19 Nov 25 15:51:08   

   1k   

   261046   

   Mild Shock to Ross Finlayson   

   What were your top-ten logic books? (Was   

   19 Nov 25 09:59:24   

   1,097b   

   261045   

   J. J. Lodder to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic"   

   19 Nov 25 14:18:15   

   1,097b   

   261044   

   Mild Shock to Ross Finlayson   

   What are top ten books in set theory? (R   

   19 Nov 25 10:15:50   

   1k   

   261043   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   Slim Fermats Last Theorem (FLT) only for   

   19 Nov 25 11:16:48   

   2k   

   261042   

   J. J. Lodder to Mild Shock   

   Re: Teach Logic: Do Non-Wellfounded Proo   

   19 Nov 25 11:12:57   

   2k   

   261041   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   17 Nov 25 04:01:49   

   2k   

   261040   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly rea   

   19 Nov 25 04:30:52   

   2k   

   261039   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of   

   17 Nov 25 04:04:06   

   1k   

   261038   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li   

   18 Nov 25 21:04:44   

   1k   

   261037   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly rea   

   18 Nov 25 21:07:35   

   2k   

   261036   

   olcott to All   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   18 Nov 25 19:46:53   

   4k   

   261035   

   Tristan Wibberley to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li   

   19 Nov 25 02:47:21   

   3,601b   

   261034   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob   

   18 Nov 25 15:10:42   

   2k   

   261033   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (5/5   

   18 Nov 25 12:47:53   

   2k   

   261032   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/5   

   18 Nov 25 12:47:53   

   7k   

   261031   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/5   

   18 Nov 25 12:47:53   

   7k   

   261030   

   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson   

   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/5   

   18 Nov 25 12:47:53   

   7k   

   261029   

   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   

   Teach Logic: Do Non-Wellfounded Proofs (   

   18 Nov 25 23:34:53   

   2k   

   261028   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Weasel word double talk excuses =--- AKA   

   18 Nov 25 15:57:35   

   4k   

   261027   

   Mild Shock to Ross Finlayson   

   How teach logic? [The Jokes] (Was: "The    

   18 Nov 25 22:43:32   

   3,905b   

   261026   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   18 Nov 25 14:01:44   

   2k   

   261025   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A   

   18 Nov 25 09:15:58   

   3k   

   261024   

   Mild Shock to Ross Finlayson   

   How teach logic? [The Jokes] (Was: "The    

   18 Nov 25 22:42:46   

   3,390b   

   261023   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: the halting problem is founded in co   

   18 Nov 25 14:12:57   

   5k   

   261022   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly rea   

   17 Nov 25 07:34:57   

   1k   

   261021   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   17 Nov 25 07:31:58   

   1k   

   261020   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   17 Nov 25 07:31:58   

   6k   

   261019   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   17 Nov 25 07:31:45   

   1k   

   261018   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two   

   17 Nov 25 07:31:45   

   6k   

   261017   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   People that have a very shallow understa   

   17 Nov 25 07:12:46   

   1k   

   261016   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   17 Nov 25 05:03:42   

   2k   

   261015   

   Alan Mackenzie to olcott   

   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A   

   17 Nov 25 13:21:59   

   1,753b   

   261014   

   Alan Mackenzie to olcott   

   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A   

   17 Nov 25 13:21:59   

   7k   

   261013   

   Mikko to olcott   

   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A   

   17 Nov 25 11:25:11   

   1k   

   261012   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   16 Nov 25 22:48:37   

   1,281b   

   261011   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   16 Nov 25 22:47:06   

   1,281b   

   261010   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   16 Nov 25 22:40:31   

   1,281b   

   261009   

   Kaz Kylheku to olcott   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   17 Nov 25 04:29:48   

   1k   

   261008   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Who agrees that Kaz is dumber than the W   

   16 Nov 25 22:26:21   

   1k   

   261007   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Kaz say that he is dumber than the Witch   

   16 Nov 25 22:19:48   

   1k   

   261006   

   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   

   Kaz PROVES that he is dumber than the Wi   

   16 Nov 25 22:25:16   

   1k   

   261005   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of   

   16 Nov 25 21:50:54   

   1k   

   261004   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   16 Nov 25 21:49:02   

   2k   

   261003   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   16 Nov 25 21:47:58   

   2k   

   261002   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of   

   17 Nov 25 03:41:31   

   1k   

   261001   

   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   16 Nov 25 18:35:22   

   1k   

   261000   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   17 Nov 25 02:21:30   

   1k   

   260999   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of   

   16 Nov 25 20:13:40   

   3k   

   260998   

   olcott to All   

   KEY BASIS OF EVERYTHING THAT I HAVE SAID   

   16 Nov 25 20:15:00   

   2,708b   

   260997   

   olcott to Alan Mackenzie   

   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A   

   16 Nov 25 20:08:53   

   5k   

   260996   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of   

   17 Nov 25 01:45:05   

   2k   

   260995   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of   

   16 Nov 25 18:52:32   

   2k   

   260994   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: halting problem shows that "true on    

   16 Nov 25 18:59:07   

   1k   

   260993   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   16 Nov 25 19:02:37   

   1k   

   260992   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   16 Nov 25 18:48:08   

   2k   

   260991   

   Alan Mackenzie to olcott   

   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A   

   16 Nov 25 22:20:44   

   5k   

   260990   

   olcott to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   16 Nov 25 18:41:45   

   1k   

   260989   

   Chris M. Thomasson to All   

   Re: Kaz ---Keith said DDD simulated by H   

   16 Nov 25 13:18:12   

   7k   

   260988   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (8/8)   

   16 Nov 25 12:26:05   

   3k   

   260987   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (7/8)   

   16 Nov 25 12:26:05   

   7k   

   260986   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/8)   

   16 Nov 25 12:26:05   

   7k   

   260985   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/8)   

   16 Nov 25 12:26:05   

   7k   

   260984   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (3/8)   

   16 Nov 25 12:26:05   

   7k   

   260983   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/8)   

   16 Nov 25 12:26:05   

   7k   

   260982   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/6)   

   16 Nov 25 12:26:16   

   4k   

   260981   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (5/6)   

   16 Nov 25 12:26:16   

   7k   

   260980   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/6)   

   16 Nov 25 12:26:16   

   7k   

   260979   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (3/6)   

   16 Nov 25 12:26:16   

   7k   

   260978   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/6)   

   16 Nov 25 12:26:16   

   7k   

   260977   

   olcott to Mikko   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   16 Nov 25 14:37:07   

   3k   

   260976   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: People that have a very shallow unde   

   16 Nov 25 19:56:05   

   1k   

   260975   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   Re: halting problem shows that "true on    

   16 Nov 25 19:49:36   

   1k   

   260974   

   Tristan Wibberley to olcott   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of   

   16 Nov 25 19:11:49   

   1k   

   260973   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (15/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   5k   

   260972   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (14/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260971   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (13/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260970   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (12/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260969   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (11/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260968   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (10/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260967   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (9/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260966   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (8/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260965   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (7/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260964   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260963   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (5/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260962   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260961   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/15)   

   16 Nov 25 09:47:45   

   7k   

   260960   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (8/8)   

   16 Nov 25 09:53:18   

   3k   

   260959   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (7/8)   

   16 Nov 25 09:53:18   

   7k   

   260958   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/8)   

   16 Nov 25 09:53:18   

   7k   

   260957   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/8)   

   16 Nov 25 09:53:18   

   7k   

   260956   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (3/8)   

   16 Nov 25 09:53:18   

   7k   

   260955   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/8)   

   16 Nov 25 09:53:18   

   7k   

   260954   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (5/5)   

   16 Nov 25 10:55:29   

   2k   

   260953   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/5)   

   16 Nov 25 10:55:29   

   7k   

   260952   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (3/5)   

   16 Nov 25 10:55:29   

   7k   

   260951   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/5)   

   16 Nov 25 10:55:29   

   7k   

   260950   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/6)   

   16 Nov 25 09:50:34   

   4k   

   260949   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (5/6)   

   16 Nov 25 09:50:34   

   7k   

   260948   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/6)   

   16 Nov 25 09:50:34   

   7k   

   260947   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (3/6)   

   16 Nov 25 09:50:34   

   7k   

   260946   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/6)   

   16 Nov 25 09:50:34   

   7k   

   260945   

   Tristan Wibberley to Tristan Wibberley   

   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang   

   16 Nov 25 18:44:48   

   1k   

   260944   

   olcott to joes   

   Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly rea   

   16 Nov 25 11:40:34   

   1k   

   260943   

   olcott to joes   

   DD simulated by HHH cannot possibly term   

   16 Nov 25 11:20:14   

   1k   

   260942   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (28/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   2k   

   260941   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (27/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260940   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (26/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260939   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (24/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260938   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (23/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260937   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (22/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260936   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (21/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260935   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (20/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260934   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (19/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260933   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (18/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260932   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (17/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260931   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (16/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260930   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (15/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260929   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (14/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260928   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (13/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260927   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (12/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260926   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (11/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260925   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (10/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260924   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (9/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260923   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (8/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260922   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (7/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260921   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260920   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (5/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260919   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260918   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/28)   

   15 Nov 25 21:18:12   

   7k   

   260917   

   HAL 9000 to olcott   

   Re: Kaz ---Keith said DDD simulated by H   

   16 Nov 25 16:46:24   

   5k   

   260916   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Kaz ---Keith said DDD simulated by H   

   16 Nov 25 11:07:06   

   6k   

   260915   

   olcott to joes   

   Halt Deciders cannot report on the behav   

   16 Nov 25 10:12:52   

   1k   

   260914   

   olcott to All   

   Re: Kaz ---Keith said DDD simulated by H   

   16 Nov 25 09:29:48   

   5k   

   260913   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (10/10)   

   15 Nov 25 21:20:43   

   4k   

   260912   

   Ross Finlayson to All   

   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (9/10)   

   15 Nov 25 21:20:43   

   7k   


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca