Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
   262912    |
   Mild Shock to All    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Lion_and_Unicorn:_H=c3=a5kan_K    |
   23 Feb 26 20:54:55    |
   1k    |
   262911    |
   Mikko to polcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   20 Feb 26 11:46:27    |
   2k    |
   262910    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   19 Feb 26 21:34:02    |
   2k    |
   262909    |
   polcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   19 Feb 26 05:47:10    |
   2k    |
   262908    |
   Mikko to polcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   19 Feb 26 12:06:19    |
   1k    |
   262907    |
   polcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   18 Feb 26 13:48:20    |
   1k    |
   262906    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   18 Feb 26 00:35:23    |
   2k    |
   262905    |
   Mikko to polcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   18 Feb 26 11:10:54    |
   1k    |
   262904    |
   polcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   17 Feb 26 06:59:17    |
   1k    |
   262903    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   17 Feb 26 11:03:51    |
   6k    |
   262902    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   17 Feb 26 11:11:09    |
   6k    |
   262901    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   17 Feb 26 11:16:59    |
   1k    |
   262900    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   16 Feb 26 22:59:41    |
   2k    |
   262899    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   16 Feb 26 11:03:00    |
   5k    |
   262898    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   16 Feb 26 07:47:07    |
   5k    |
   262897    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   16 Feb 26 13:31:12    |
   5,604b    |
   262896    |
   Mikko to polcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   16 Feb 26 13:25:57    |
   5k    |
   262895    |
   polcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   15 Feb 26 13:39:01    |
   2k    |
   262894    |
   Alan Mackenzie to polcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   15 Feb 26 19:54:36    |
   2k    |
   262893    |
   polcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   15 Feb 26 13:06:25    |
   5k    |
   262892    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   15 Feb 26 18:15:10    |
   5k    |
   262891    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   15 Feb 26 18:08:55    |
   5,448b    |
   262890    |
   Alan Mackenzie to tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.m    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   15 Feb 26 19:27:48    |
   1k    |
   262889    |
   Mikko to polcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   15 Feb 26 11:18:08    |
   4k    |
   262888    |
   polcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   15 Feb 26 07:02:19    |
   5k    |
   262887    |
   Mikko to polcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   15 Feb 26 11:19:34    |
   4k    |
   262886    |
   polcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   14 Feb 26 14:59:46    |
   5k    |
   262885    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   14 Feb 26 11:14:03    |
   4k    |
   262884    |
   polcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   14 Feb 26 09:31:48    |
   4k    |
   262883    |
   Mild Shock to All    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?ANN:_CulotteTalk=e2=84=a2_=e2=    |
   13 Feb 26 14:56:34    |
   4,475b    |
   262882    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   13 Feb 26 10:30:30    |
   3k    |
   262881    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   13 Feb 26 07:32:25    |
   4k    |
   262880    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa    |
   12 Feb 26 19:04:16    |
   1k    |
   262879    |
   olcott to All    |
   Making all knowledge expressed in langua    |
   12 Feb 26 19:32:26    |
   2k    |
   262878    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa    |
   12 Feb 26 14:26:21    |
   1k    |
   262877    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: on ignoring the undecidable    |
   12 Feb 26 17:23:06    |
   3k    |
   262876    |
   Alan Mackenzie to tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.m    |
   Re: on ignoring the undecidable    |
   12 Feb 26 20:02:49    |
   3k    |
   262875    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa    |
   12 Feb 26 19:00:31    |
   1k    |
   262874    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: on ignoring the undecidable --- is t    |
   12 Feb 26 11:41:55    |
   4k    |
   262873    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   12 Feb 26 10:34:23    |
   6k    |
   262872    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   12 Feb 26 09:48:40    |
   4k    |
   262871    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   12 Feb 26 11:01:14    |
   1k    |
   262870    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa    |
   12 Feb 26 10:06:11    |
   6k    |
   262869    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   12 Feb 26 10:11:51    |
   3k    |
   262868    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   12 Feb 26 10:25:27    |
   3k    |
   262867    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa    |
   11 Feb 26 19:09:42    |
   3k    |
   262866    |
   olcott to All    |
   Making all knowledge expressed in langua    |
   11 Feb 26 20:17:20    |
   3k    |
   262865    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa    |
   11 Feb 26 17:41:58    |
   2k    |
   262864    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa    |
   11 Feb 26 15:27:45    |
   2k    |
   262863    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa    |
   11 Feb 26 07:08:41    |
   3k    |
   262862    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   11 Feb 26 06:38:04    |
   3k    |
   262861    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Making all knowledge expressed in la    |
   11 Feb 26 12:51:27    |
   2k    |
   262860    |
   olcott to All    |
   Making the body of knowledge computable    |
   10 Feb 26 22:59:24    |
   1,995b    |
   262859    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Making all knowledge expressed in langua    |
   10 Feb 26 07:37:02    |
   2k    |
   262858    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: on ignoring the undecidable    |
   10 Feb 26 11:06:02    |
   2k    |
   262857    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: on ignoring the undecidable    |
   10 Feb 26 11:00:32    |
   1,928b    |
   262856    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: on ignoring the undecidable    |
   09 Feb 26 09:36:55    |
   2k    |
   262855    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: on ignoring the undecidable --- proo    |
   09 Feb 26 19:37:21    |
   1k    |
   262854    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: on ignoring the undecidable --- PLO    |
   09 Feb 26 11:42:05    |
   2k    |
   262853    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: on ignoring the undecidable    |
   09 Feb 26 16:57:23    |
   1k    |
   262852    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: on ignoring the undecidable    |
   09 Feb 26 16:43:33    |
   1k    |
   262851    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   09 Feb 26 08:02:39    |
   1k    |
   262850    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   08 Feb 26 05:33:57    |
   1k    |
   262849    |
   user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid to All    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   08 Feb 26 11:34:10    |
   1k    |
   262848    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej    |
   08 Feb 26 11:06:04    |
   2k    |
   262847    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   07 Feb 26 23:07:03    |
   4k    |
   262846    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   07 Feb 26 22:59:57    |
   4,107b    |
   262845    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   08 Feb 26 02:59:37    |
   4,107b    |
   262844    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   08 Feb 26 02:49:30    |
   1k    |
   262843    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   07 Feb 26 19:10:58    |
   3k    |
   262842    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   08 Feb 26 02:58:16    |
   1k    |
   262841    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   08 Feb 26 02:47:49    |
   1k    |
   262840    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   07 Feb 26 10:46:53    |
   3k    |
   262839    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: on ignoring the undecidable    |
   07 Feb 26 10:43:15    |
   1k    |
   262838    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej    |
   07 Feb 26 09:08:56    |
   2k    |
   262837    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   07 Feb 26 09:10:00    |
   2k    |
   262836    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   07 Feb 26 08:22:36    |
   2k    |
   262835    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   07 Feb 26 07:10:28    |
   1k    |
   262834    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej    |
   07 Feb 26 12:15:56    |
   1k    |
   262833    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej    |
   07 Feb 26 07:08:51    |
   2k    |
   262832    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   07 Feb 26 12:25:05    |
   1,819b    |
   262831    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   07 Feb 26 11:50:13    |
   1,819b    |
   262830    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej    |
   06 Feb 26 09:32:37    |
   1k    |
   262829    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   06 Feb 26 22:35:07    |
   6k    |
   262828    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   06 Feb 26 20:16:25    |
   6k    |
   262827    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   06 Feb 26 19:13:50    |
   6k    |
   262826    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   06 Feb 26 18:10:51    |
   5k    |
   262825    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   06 Feb 26 14:00:34    |
   3k    |
   262824    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   06 Feb 26 09:30:53    |
   1k    |
   262823    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   06 Feb 26 08:58:19    |
   6k    |
   262822    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   06 Feb 26 10:21:15    |
   7k    |
   262821    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 23:26:38    |
   6k    |
   262820    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej    |
   06 Feb 26 11:15:10    |
   1k    |
   262819    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   06 Feb 26 11:01:09    |
   1,150b    |
   262818    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 23:42:58    |
   7k    |
   262817    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 21:22:05    |
   7k    |
   262816    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 23:01:43    |
   6k    |
   262815    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 20:36:36    |
   7k    |
   262814    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 22:31:39    |
   6k    |
   262813    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 20:15:23    |
   7k    |
   262812    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 22:08:25    |
   6k    |
   262811    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 19:23:50    |
   7k    |
   262810    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 21:11:14    |
   6k    |
   262809    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 18:49:58    |
   7k    |
   262808    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
   05 Feb 26 18:44:54    |
   2k    |
   262807    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej    |
   05 Feb 26 12:45:28    |
   2,476b    |
   262806    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 14:20:17    |
   6k    |
   262805    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   05 Feb 26 10:06:04    |
   6k    |
   262804    |
   olcott to All    |
   Changing the foundational basis to Proof    |
   05 Feb 26 10:55:56    |
   2k    |
   262803    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: When halt provers are allowed to rej    |
   05 Feb 26 05:28:30    |
   1k    |
   262802    |
   Mild Shock to olcott    |
   Corr.: The Perfectly Dead Horse (Re: 202    |
   05 Feb 26 09:08:00    |
   2k    |
   262801    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   04 Feb 26 21:04:43    |
   5k    |
   262800    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   04 Feb 26 18:52:52    |
   5k    |
   262799    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   04 Feb 26 20:50:26    |
   5k    |
   262798    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   04 Feb 26 18:42:56    |
   4k    |
   262797    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   04 Feb 26 18:00:10    |
   4k    |
   262796    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mild Shock    |
   Re: 2026 the Year Prolog **plonked** Its    |
   04 Feb 26 23:03:11    |
   1k    |
   262795    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: 2026 the Year Prolog **plonked** Its    |
   04 Feb 26 17:25:40    |
   1,099b    |
   262794    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   04 Feb 26 15:43:54    |
   4k    |
   262793    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   04 Feb 26 14:19:41    |
   3k    |
   262792    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   04 Feb 26 16:27:27    |
   3k    |
   262791    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   04 Feb 26 16:15:42    |
   3k    |
   262790    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Halting Problem and Proof Theoretic     |
   04 Feb 26 07:29:12    |
   2,768b    |
   262789    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   04 Feb 26 12:41:30    |
   2k    |
   262788    |
   Mild Shock to All    |
   2026 the Year Prolog **plonked** Itself     |
   04 Feb 26 02:21:40    |
   2,023b    |
   262787    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Halting Problem and Proof Theoretic     |
   02 Feb 26 23:41:41    |
   2k    |
   262786    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   02 Feb 26 09:39:34    |
   5k    |
   262785    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Halting Problem and Proof Theoretic     |
   02 Feb 26 07:49:21    |
   2k    |
   262784    |
   olcott to All    |
   Halting Problem and Proof Theoretic Sema    |
   01 Feb 26 21:32:51    |
   2k    |
   262783    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   01 Feb 26 18:28:21    |
   2k    |
   262782    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   01 Feb 26 18:00:12    |
   2k    |
   262781    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   01 Feb 26 17:45:12    |
   1k    |
   262780    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   01 Feb 26 14:12:39    |
   2k    |
   262779    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   01 Feb 26 20:04:09    |
   2k    |
   262778    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   01 Feb 26 12:36:13    |
   3k    |
   262777    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   01 Feb 26 13:35:54    |
   2k    |
   262776    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   01 Feb 26 11:35:46    |
   2k    |
   262775    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   01 Feb 26 09:18:03    |
   2,455b    |
   262774    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   01 Feb 26 09:18:03    |
   7k    |
   262773    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   01 Feb 26 07:33:39    |
   3k    |
   262772    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   NVMe's are worse than a human brain (Re:    |
   01 Feb 26 14:01:13    |
   2k    |
   262771    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   01 Feb 26 07:33:42    |
   3k    |
   262770    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   01 Feb 26 12:28:05    |
   6k    |
   262769    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Proof theoretic semantics based halt    |
   01 Feb 26 07:11:22    |
   2k    |
   262768    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   01 Feb 26 12:17:39    |
   4k    |
   262767    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   31 Jan 26 09:23:51    |
   6k    |
   262766    |
   olcott to All    |
   Proof theoretic semantics based halt pro    |
   31 Jan 26 11:49:45    |
   1k    |
   262765    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   30 Jan 26 23:39:33    |
   2k    |
   262764    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   30 Jan 26 20:10:47    |
   1k    |
   262763    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   31 Jan 26 09:26:43    |
   4k    |
   262762    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   31 Jan 26 10:56:22    |
   4k    |
   262761    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   31 Jan 26 01:47:22    |
   1k    |
   262760    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   31 Jan 26 10:41:30    |
   5k    |
   262759    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   30 Jan 26 08:35:02    |
   4k    |
   262758    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   30 Jan 26 11:34:10    |
   4k    |
   262757    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   29 Jan 26 07:57:29    |
   4k    |
   262756    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   29 Jan 26 11:12:05    |
   3k    |
   262755    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   29 Jan 26 04:39:08    |
   1k    |
   262754    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   28 Jan 26 20:10:34    |
   1,057b    |
   262753    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   28 Jan 26 12:17:32    |
   2k    |
   262752    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   28 Jan 26 12:08:43    |
   2k    |
   262751    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   28 Jan 26 23:59:00    |
   2,257b    |
   262750    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   28 Jan 26 11:40:26    |
   2k    |
   262749    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   28 Jan 26 07:49:31    |
   4k    |
   262748    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   28 Jan 26 16:34:29    |
   2k    |
   262747    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   28 Jan 26 11:54:17    |
   3k    |
   262746    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   28 Jan 26 16:21:42    |
   2k    |
   262745    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   28 Jan 26 11:45:09    |
   3k    |
   262744    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   27 Jan 26 09:32:42    |
   3k    |
   262743    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   27 Jan 26 08:48:53    |
   2k    |
   262742    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   27 Jan 26 10:17:08    |
   2k    |
   262741    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   27 Jan 26 09:29:23    |
   4k    |
   262740    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   27 Jan 26 10:05:05    |
   2k    |
   262739    |
   Mikko to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   27 Jan 26 10:15:32    |
   3k    |
   262738    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   26 Jan 26 11:28:05    |
   3k    |
   262737    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   26 Jan 26 10:58:21    |
   3k    |
   262736    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   26 Jan 26 09:22:01    |
   2k    |
   262735    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   26 Jan 26 14:55:14    |
   2k    |
   262734    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 20:31:23    |
   5k    |
   262733    |
   dart200 to Richard Damon    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   25 Jan 26 13:07:35    |
   7k    |
   262732    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 14:07:41    |
   4k    |
   262731    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 14:09:17    |
   6k    |
   262730    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 13:10:56    |
   6k    |
   262729    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 14:21:47    |
   3k    |
   262728    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 13:05:57    |
   2k    |
   262727    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 13:09:54    |
   5k    |
   262726    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 12:33:30    |
   5k    |
   262725    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 07:30:24    |
   2k    |
   262724    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 07:24:09    |
   4k    |
   262723    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 13:24:54    |
   1k    |
   262722    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   25 Jan 26 13:19:19    |
   3k    |
   262721    |
   dart200 to Richard Damon    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   24 Jan 26 19:03:43    |
   6k    |
   262720    |
   dart200 to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   24 Jan 26 18:28:58    |
   3k    |
   262719    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   25 Jan 26 13:12:01    |
   2k    |
   262718    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   24 Jan 26 19:44:52    |
   3k    |
   262717    |
   dart200 to Richard Damon    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   24 Jan 26 14:28:28    |
   4k    |
   262716    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   24 Jan 26 16:31:31    |
   2k    |
   262715    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   24 Jan 26 14:38:28    |
   2k    |
   262714    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti    |
   24 Jan 26 13:28:25    |
   1k    |
   262713    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   24 Jan 26 13:25:42    |
   1k    |
   262712    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti    |
   24 Jan 26 13:26:59    |
   1k    |
   262711    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   24 Jan 26 11:54:38    |
   6k    |
   262710    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti    |
   24 Jan 26 11:56:42    |
   1k    |
   262709    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti    |
   24 Jan 26 12:20:04    |
   1,190b    |
   262708    |
   Bonita Montero to All    |
   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti    |
   24 Jan 26 18:17:55    |
   1,190b    |
   262707    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   24 Jan 26 09:44:50    |
   7k    |
   262706    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   24 Jan 26 09:48:04    |
   1k    |
   262705    |
   dart200 to Richard Damon    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   24 Jan 26 08:49:08    |
   2k    |
   262704    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   24 Jan 26 09:39:00    |
   2,354b    |
   262703    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   24 Jan 26 08:21:09    |
   5k    |
   262702    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   24 Jan 26 08:18:34    |
   1k    |
   262701    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   24 Jan 26 08:01:52    |
   3k    |
   262700    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   24 Jan 26 10:42:23    |
   1k    |
   262699    |
   dart200 to Mikko    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   24 Jan 26 01:21:45    |
   1k    |
   262698    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   24 Jan 26 10:23:57    |
   1,494b    |
   262697    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   24 Jan 26 10:20:59    |
   3k    |
   262696    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   23 Jan 26 20:56:58    |
   4k    |
   262695    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   23 Jan 26 19:51:50    |
   3k    |
   262694    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   23 Jan 26 21:05:22    |
   5k    |
   262693    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   23 Jan 26 18:01:21    |
   2k    |
   262692    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   23 Jan 26 17:50:24    |
   2k    |
   262691    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   23 Jan 26 11:24:04    |
   2k    |
   262690    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   23 Jan 26 11:14:13    |
   2k    |
   262689    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   23 Jan 26 04:22:51    |
   3k    |
   262688    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   23 Jan 26 11:31:29    |
   2,955b    |
   262687    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   23 Jan 26 08:29:32    |
   1k    |
   262686    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   23 Jan 26 04:19:38    |
   1k    |
   262685    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   23 Jan 26 11:13:37    |
   2k    |
   262684    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   23 Jan 26 04:43:32    |
   2k    |
   262683    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   22 Jan 26 21:21:09    |
   1k    |
   262682    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   22 Jan 26 22:18:23    |
   6k    |
   262681    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   22 Jan 26 21:51:25    |
   6k    |
   262680    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   22 Jan 26 19:38:40    |
   2k    |
   262679    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   23 Jan 26 01:15:59    |
   2k    |
   262678    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   22 Jan 26 19:05:39    |
   3k    |
   262677    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   22 Jan 26 18:49:05    |
   4k    |
   262676    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   22 Jan 26 18:33:12    |
   5k    |
   262675    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   22 Jan 26 18:29:57    |
   2k    |
   262674    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   23 Jan 26 00:23:32    |
   2k    |
   262673    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti    |
   22 Jan 26 18:15:18    |
   1,640b    |
   262672    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti    |
   22 Jan 26 19:09:10    |
   2k    |
   262671    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   22 Jan 26 19:13:05    |
   7k    |
   262670    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: a subset of Turing machines can stil    |
   22 Jan 26 17:58:46    |
   6,700b    |
   262669    |
   olcott to All    |
   Well-founded proof theoretic semantics e    |
   22 Jan 26 11:32:36    |
   6,700b    |
   262668    |
   olcott to All    |
   Well-founded proof theoretic semantics e    |
   22 Jan 26 11:40:31    |
   6,700b    |
   262667    |
   olcott to All    |
   Well-founded proof theoretic semantics e    |
   22 Jan 26 11:25:34    |
   6,700b    |
   262666    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   22 Jan 26 10:47:58    |
   6,700b    |
   262665    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   22 Jan 26 10:40:20    |
   3k    |
   262664    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   22 Jan 26 10:43:24    |
   6k    |
   262663    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   22 Jan 26 12:40:35    |
   1k    |
   262662    |
   olcott to Python    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   21 Jan 26 23:18:20    |
   5k    |
   262661    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   22 Jan 26 10:21:15    |
   7k    |
   262660    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   22 Jan 26 10:30:12    |
   1k    |
   262659    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   21 Jan 26 22:37:53    |
   6k    |
   262658    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   21 Jan 26 21:53:59    |
   4k    |
   262657    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   Magic square of squares [Richard Guy] (R    |
   22 Jan 26 01:41:30    |
   2k    |
   262656    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   21 Jan 26 21:24:33    |
   2k    |
   262655    |
   Moebius to All    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   22 Jan 26 02:23:06    |
   2,518b    |
   262654    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   21 Jan 26 20:56:23    |
   1k    |
   262653    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   21 Jan 26 09:45:37    |
   4k    |
   262652    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   21 Jan 26 20:29:41    |
   2k    |
   262651    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   21 Jan 26 14:14:47    |
   1k    |
   262650    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   21 Jan 26 09:14:42    |
   6k    |
   262649    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   21 Jan 26 19:02:42    |
   1k    |
   262648    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   21 Jan 26 18:55:51    |
   1k    |
   262647    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   21 Jan 26 09:22:54    |
   7k    |
   262646    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   21 Jan 26 13:46:02    |
   1k    |
   262645    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   21 Jan 26 11:03:35    |
   1,456b    |
   262644    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   21 Jan 26 11:03:35    |
   7k    |
   262643    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   21 Jan 26 07:38:37    |
   4k    |
   262642    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   21 Jan 26 07:35:58    |
   3k    |
   262641    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   20 Jan 26 22:49:21    |
   4k    |
   262640    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   20 Jan 26 22:54:58    |
   3k    |
   262639    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   20 Jan 26 17:33:57    |
   2k    |
   262638    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   20 Jan 26 23:08:00    |
   2k    |
   262637    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   20 Jan 26 15:39:48    |
   3k    |
   262636    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: "true on the basis of meaning expres    |
   20 Jan 26 13:21:47    |
   4k    |
   262635    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   20 Jan 26 15:23:08    |
   2k    |
   262634    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   20 Jan 26 12:35:45    |
   2,361b    |
   262633    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   20 Jan 26 12:35:45    |
   6k    |
   262632    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   20 Jan 26 14:00:56    |
   5k    |
   262631    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   20 Jan 26 11:58:50    |
   6k    |
   262630    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   20 Jan 26 10:50:41    |
   6k    |
   262629    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Back in 2020 I proved that Wittgenst    |
   20 Jan 26 12:13:19    |
   4k    |
   262628    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   20 Jan 26 11:48:41    |
   3,753b    |
   262627    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   19 Jan 26 20:39:39    |
   2k    |
   262626    |
   Mild Shock to All    |
   Die Geschichte von Ludwig XIV [AI is not    |
   19 Jan 26 23:03:57    |
   2,301b    |
   262625    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: "true on the basis of meaning expres    |
   19 Jan 26 14:32:05    |
   2k    |
   262624    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   "true on the basis of meaning expressed     |
   19 Jan 26 14:39:25    |
   2k    |
   262623    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   19 Jan 26 13:20:39    |
   2k    |
   262622    |
   olcott to All    |
   Proof of original authorship    |
   19 Jan 26 10:49:24    |
   2,494b    |
   262621    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   19 Jan 26 09:03:39    |
   6k    |
   262620    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   19 Jan 26 15:00:39    |
   1k    |
   262619    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   19 Jan 26 08:43:01    |
   6k    |
   262618    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   19 Jan 26 13:58:24    |
   2k    |
   262617    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   19 Jan 26 06:49:22    |
   5k    |
   262616    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   19 Jan 26 10:19:34    |
   7k    |
   262615    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
   19 Jan 26 10:24:03    |
   1k    |
   262614    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   19 Jan 26 10:35:15    |
   3k    |
   262613    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   18 Jan 26 22:56:51    |
   3k    |
   262612    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   18 Jan 26 22:28:04    |
   2k    |
   262611    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   18 Jan 26 21:17:33    |
   6k    |
   262610    |
   olcott to Python    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   18 Jan 26 21:19:54    |
   1k    |
   262609    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   18 Jan 26 17:41:21    |
   6k    |
   262608    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   18 Jan 26 15:49:01    |
   6k    |
   262607    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   18 Jan 26 12:38:52    |
   6k    |
   262606    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
   18 Jan 26 07:45:37    |
   5k    |
   262605    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   18 Jan 26 06:53:52    |
   4k    |
   262604    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   18 Jan 26 12:44:57    |
   3,754b    |
   262603    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   18 Jan 26 07:28:45    |
   6k    |
   262602    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   18 Jan 26 12:38:13    |
   1k    |
   262601    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Glossary_building_=28Was=3A_Re    |
   18 Jan 26 11:53:14    |
   3k    |
   262600    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   18 Jan 26 14:06:39    |
   2,593b    |
   262599    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
   18 Jan 26 13:54:13    |
   4k    |
   262598    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   18 Jan 26 13:27:00    |
   5k    |
   262597    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   18 Jan 26 13:18:01    |
   2k    |
   262596    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   18 Jan 26 11:51:43    |
   1k    |
   262595    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   18 Jan 26 12:09:00    |
   1k    |
   262594    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   17 Jan 26 22:38:28    |
   6k    |
   262593    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   17 Jan 26 21:59:25    |
   6k    |
   262592    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   17 Jan 26 19:59:54    |
   5k    |
   262591    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   17 Jan 26 19:30:50    |
   5k    |
   262590    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   17 Jan 26 18:49:06    |
   3k    |
   262589    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
   17 Jan 26 16:50:49    |
   3k    |
   262588    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   17 Jan 26 22:21:51    |
   3,238b    |
   262587    |
   olcott to All    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_never_act    |
   17 Jan 26 15:08:22    |
   2k    |
   262586    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   17 Jan 26 10:11:19    |
   7k    |
   262585    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   17 Jan 26 10:01:20    |
   7k    |
   262584    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   17 Jan 26 09:54:03    |
   2k    |
   262583    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   17 Jan 26 08:47:10    |
   4k    |
   262582    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   17 Jan 26 07:03:50    |
   7k    |
   262581    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   17 Jan 26 12:25:29    |
   7k    |
   262580    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   17 Jan 26 10:55:11    |
   1k    |
   262579    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Schematic systems    |
   17 Jan 26 12:11:10    |
   1,041b    |
   262578    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   17 Jan 26 12:00:31    |
   1,041b    |
   262577    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   17 Jan 26 11:53:21    |
   4k    |
   262576    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   17 Jan 26 11:46:33    |
   2k    |
   262575    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   17 Jan 26 11:22:40    |
   2k    |
   262574    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   16 Jan 26 21:44:28    |
   6k    |
   262573    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   16 Jan 26 21:42:30    |
   6k    |
   262572    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   16 Jan 26 19:23:29    |
   6k    |
   262571    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   16 Jan 26 19:27:55    |
   6,646b    |
   262570    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   16 Jan 26 19:27:55    |
   6k    |
   262569    |
   olcott to All    |
   The essence of all Computation generical    |
   16 Jan 26 16:58:20    |
   4k    |
   262568    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   16 Jan 26 16:09:54    |
   7k    |
   262567    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   16 Jan 26 14:51:14    |
   6k    |
   262566    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   16 Jan 26 14:24:29    |
   4k    |
   262565    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Pat    |
   16 Jan 26 13:16:00    |
   4k    |
   262564    |
   user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid to All    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=B6    |
   16 Jan 26 18:12:37    |
   4k    |
   262563    |
   olcott to athel.cb@gmail.com    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   16 Jan 26 12:21:26    |
   5k    |
   262562    |
   olcott to All    |
   Proof Theoretic Semantics Blocks Patholo    |
   16 Jan 26 11:47:53    |
   1k    |
   262561    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   16 Jan 26 08:12:56    |
   6k    |
   262560    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   16 Jan 26 09:12:11    |
   6k    |
   262559    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   16 Jan 26 09:38:16    |
   4k    |
   262558    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   16 Jan 26 11:17:14    |
   7k    |
   262557    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   16 Jan 26 11:32:39    |
   3k    |
   262556    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   16 Jan 26 11:21:05    |
   3,366b    |
   262555    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 22:03:52    |
   7k    |
   262554    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Systems such as PA with proof-theore    |
   15 Jan 26 21:59:31    |
   2k    |
   262553    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   15 Jan 26 22:23:54    |
   2k    |
   262552    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   15 Jan 26 22:20:25    |
   3k    |
   262551    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Systems such as PA with proof-theoretic     |
   15 Jan 26 18:24:12    |
   2,874b    |
   262550    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Schematic systems    |
   15 Jan 26 20:06:50    |
   2,874b    |
   262549    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Systems such as PA with proof-theore    |
   15 Jan 26 19:18:36    |
   1k    |
   262548    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 17:38:26    |
   7k    |
   262547    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Systems such as PA with proof-theore    |
   16 Jan 26 00:47:20    |
   1k    |
   262546    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
   15 Jan 26 17:40:31    |
   4k    |
   262545    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   15 Jan 26 17:45:29    |
   1k    |
   262544    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   15 Jan 26 17:43:51    |
   2k    |
   262543    |
   Tristan Wibberley to All    |
   Schematic systems    |
   15 Jan 26 23:10:22    |
   1k    |
   262542    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   15 Jan 26 14:37:24    |
   2k    |
   262541    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 14:30:41    |
   3k    |
   262540    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 15:04:28    |
   1k    |
   262539    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 10:54:19    |
   1,070b    |
   262538    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 10:54:19    |
   7k    |
   262537    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 11:34:28    |
   6,681b    |
   262536    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 11:34:28    |
   7k    |
   262535    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
   15 Jan 26 14:36:21    |
   1k    |
   262534    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 15:57:44    |
   1k    |
   262533    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 14:52:09    |
   1k    |
   262532    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem proof fails unde    |
   15 Jan 26 06:50:36    |
   2k    |
   262531    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
   15 Jan 26 14:31:09    |
   1k    |
   262530    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
   15 Jan 26 14:30:56    |
   1k    |
   262529    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   15 Jan 26 06:50:41    |
   1k    |
   262528    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   15 Jan 26 06:50:39    |
   2k    |
   262527    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
   15 Jan 26 06:50:33    |
   5k    |
   262526    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 11:48:30    |
   7k    |
   262525    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   15 Jan 26 12:02:12    |
   1k    |
   262524    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 11:38:51    |
   6k    |
   262523    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 11:34:38    |
   3k    |
   262522    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 11:26:53    |
   2,700b    |
   262521    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The halting problem proof fails unde    |
   14 Jan 26 23:33:05    |
   2k    |
   262520    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   15 Jan 26 11:21:27    |
   6k    |
   262519    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   14 Jan 26 23:30:31    |
   1k    |
   262518    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   14 Jan 26 23:27:29    |
   2k    |
   262517    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
   14 Jan 26 23:24:48    |
   4k    |
   262516    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 22:51:56    |
   4,473b    |
   262515    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem proof fails unde    |
   14 Jan 26 22:45:00    |
   1k    |
   262514    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 19:25:13    |
   6k    |
   262513    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The halting problem proof fails unde    |
   14 Jan 26 18:51:35    |
   6,502b    |
   262512    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem proof fails unde    |
   15 Jan 26 00:26:18    |
   6,502b    |
   262511    |
   olcott to All    |
   The halting problem proof fails under op    |
   14 Jan 26 18:14:25    |
   2k    |
   262510    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 13:14:01    |
   6k    |
   262509    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=    |
   14 Jan 26 16:11:16    |
   1k    |
   262508    |
   olcott to All    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Closing_the_gap_of_G=C3=B6del_    |
   14 Jan 26 15:36:14    |
   1,081b    |
   262507    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 13:35:58    |
   6k    |
   262506    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 13:19:57    |
   6k    |
   262505    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 13:32:02    |
   3k    |
   262504    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 11:28:31    |
   6k    |
   262503    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 11:04:18    |
   5k    |
   262502    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 14:52:27    |
   1k    |
   262501    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 14:55:45    |
   1k    |
   262500    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 10:24:29    |
   1,141b    |
   262499    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 11:01:56    |
   2k    |
   262498    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 10:53:30    |
   2k    |
   262497    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 09:58:26    |
   5k    |
   262496    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 10:39:46    |
   5,240b    |
   262495    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   14 Jan 26 09:40:52    |
   6k    |
   262494    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   13 Jan 26 12:50:51    |
   2k    |
   262493    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   13 Jan 26 18:23:42    |
   2k    |
   262492    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   13 Jan 26 08:31:33    |
   2k    |
   262491    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   13 Jan 26 08:27:17    |
   6k    |
   262490    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
   13 Jan 26 12:43:24    |
   3k    |
   262489    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   13 Jan 26 14:31:01    |
   1k    |
   262488    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   13 Jan 26 08:34:48    |
   1,256b    |
   262487    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   13 Jan 26 11:11:20    |
   5k    |
   262486    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   13 Jan 26 08:17:53    |
   6k    |
   262485    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   13 Jan 26 11:13:22    |
   2k    |
   262484    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   13 Jan 26 10:46:37    |
   5k    |
   262483    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
   12 Jan 26 22:46:43    |
   2k    |
   262482    |
   olcott to All    |
   What formal logical systems resolve the     |
   12 Jan 26 15:41:27    |
   2k    |
   262481    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   12 Jan 26 08:43:43    |
   5k    |
   262480    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   12 Jan 26 13:05:02    |
   4k    |
   262479    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   12 Jan 26 08:29:00    |
   5k    |
   262478    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   12 Jan 26 08:32:20    |
   2k    |
   262477    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   12 Jan 26 12:44:51    |
   4k    |
   262476    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   12 Jan 26 12:51:55    |
   4k    |
   262475    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa    |
   12 Jan 26 06:29:34    |
   2k    |
   262474    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   12 Jan 26 06:32:33    |
   1k    |
   262473    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Computation and Undecidability    |
   11 Jan 26 21:28:40    |
   1k    |
   262472    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Computation and Undecidability    |
   11 Jan 26 15:50:30    |
   1k    |
   262471    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Computation and Undecidability    |
   11 Jan 26 12:12:42    |
   1k    |
   262470    |
   Richard Damon to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Computation and Undecidability    |
   11 Jan 26 12:52:37    |
   1k    |
   262469    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   11 Jan 26 16:16:44    |
   1k    |
   262468    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_how    |
   11 Jan 26 14:49:46    |
   1k    |
   262467    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computation and Undecidability    |
   11 Jan 26 14:39:32    |
   1k    |
   262466    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   11 Jan 26 08:32:00    |
   3k    |
   262465    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   11 Jan 26 08:18:11    |
   5k    |
   262464    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   11 Jan 26 08:23:00    |
   4k    |
   262463    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   11 Jan 26 12:34:32    |
   3k    |
   262462    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa    |
   11 Jan 26 12:26:22    |
   1k    |
   262461    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   11 Jan 26 12:13:32    |
   4k    |
   262460    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   11 Jan 26 07:09:09    |
   2k    |
   262459    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   11 Jan 26 12:22:02    |
   3k    |
   262458    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Computation and Undecidability    |
   10 Jan 26 22:32:22    |
   1k    |
   262457    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Computation and Undecidability    |
   10 Jan 26 21:24:25    |
   1k    |
   262456    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computation and Undecidability (2/2)    |
   10 Jan 26 21:18:28    |
   1,288b    |
   262455    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   10 Jan 26 21:34:41    |
   7k    |
   262454    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computation and Undecidability (2/2)    |
   10 Jan 26 20:52:37    |
   6,756b    |
   262453    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   10 Jan 26 20:22:27    |
   7k    |
   262452    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   10 Jan 26 21:03:41    |
   7k    |
   262451    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   10 Jan 26 19:59:16    |
   4k    |
   262450    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   10 Jan 26 18:52:47    |
   4,372b    |
   262449    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   10 Jan 26 18:52:47    |
   7k    |
   262448    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   10 Jan 26 19:35:31    |
   6k    |
   262447    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   10 Jan 26 19:35:41    |
   5k    |
   262446    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   10 Jan 26 18:16:23    |
   4k    |
   262445    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   10 Jan 26 18:19:44    |
   3k    |
   262444    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   10 Jan 26 18:13:46    |
   5k    |
   262443    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   10 Jan 26 18:19:36    |
   4k    |
   262442    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mild Shock    |
   Re: Failed coping with AI: Moshe Vardi (    |
   10 Jan 26 17:02:56    |
   1k    |
   262441    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   Chad Brown's Megalodon goes LLM (Re: Goo    |
   10 Jan 26 17:21:21    |
   2k    |
   262440    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   10 Jan 26 10:19:51    |
   3k    |
   262439    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   10 Jan 26 09:47:20    |
   4k    |
   262438    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa    |
   10 Jan 26 10:11:17    |
   1k    |
   262437    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa    |
   10 Jan 26 11:02:47    |
   1,492b    |
   262436    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   10 Jan 26 10:23:14    |
   3k    |
   262435    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   10 Jan 26 11:25:01    |
   3k    |
   262434    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   Help! An AI found a Heuristic for me (Re    |
   10 Jan 26 02:40:09    |
   2k    |
   262433    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   A new proposal: The Gladiator Test (Re:     |
   10 Jan 26 03:21:56    |
   5k    |
   262432    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   Failed coping with AI: Moshe Vardi (Re:     |
   10 Jan 26 03:04:18    |
   4k    |
   262431    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa    |
   09 Jan 26 09:53:50    |
   1k    |
   262430    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   09 Jan 26 09:52:01    |
   2k    |
   262429    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   09 Jan 26 11:59:26    |
   2k    |
   262428    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Haskell Curry Foundations of Mathematica    |
   09 Jan 26 09:47:45    |
   3k    |
   262427    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Prolog formally resolves the Liar Pa    |
   09 Jan 26 12:03:33    |
   2,636b    |
   262426    |
   olcott to All    |
   Prolog formally resolves the Liar Parado    |
   08 Jan 26 17:28:22    |
   2k    |
   262425    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   08 Jan 26 08:18:30    |
   3k    |
   262424    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   08 Jan 26 08:22:22    |
   2k    |
   262423    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   08 Jan 26 12:21:15    |
   2k    |
   262422    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   08 Jan 26 12:22:50    |
   1k    |
   262421    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Jeff Barnett    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 23:44:04    |
   7k    |
   262420    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Exactly what are deciders in the theory     |
   07 Jan 26 15:29:42    |
   3k    |
   262419    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   07 Jan 26 07:06:37    |
   2k    |
   262418    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   07 Jan 26 14:10:11    |
   2k    |
   262417    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   07 Jan 26 05:54:47    |
   2k    |
   262416    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_the    |
   06 Jan 26 23:43:09    |
   5k    |
   262415    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem asks for too muc    |
   07 Jan 26 13:49:14    |
   5,562b    |
   262414    |
   olcott to All    |
   The Halting Problem asks for too much    |
   06 Jan 26 22:44:13    |
   5,562b    |
   262413    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_the    |
   06 Jan 26 15:18:33    |
   5,562b    |
   262412    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1931_In    |
   06 Jan 26 08:02:27    |
   1k    |
   262411    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   06 Jan 26 08:39:31    |
   2k    |
   262410    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   06 Jan 26 02:26:01    |
   1k    |
   262409    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_the    |
   06 Jan 26 02:32:46    |
   1k    |
   262408    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   06 Jan 26 01:59:42    |
   1k    |
   262407    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   06 Jan 26 01:02:38    |
   2k    |
   262406    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Jeff Barnett    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   06 Jan 26 00:47:45    |
   2k    |
   262405    |
   olcott to All    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Why_do_people_ignore_how_G=C3=    |
   05 Jan 26 18:06:15    |
   1,617b    |
   262404    |
   Mike Terry to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 23:10:16    |
   4k    |
   262403    |
   Jeff Barnett to All    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 14:16:12    |
   4,040b    |
   262402    |
   olcott to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 12:01:43    |
   6k    |
   262401    |
   Mike Terry to Jeff Barnett    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 17:04:47    |
   6k    |
   262400    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   05 Jan 26 08:59:50    |
   2k    |
   262399    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_the    |
   05 Jan 26 08:54:07    |
   2k    |
   262398    |
   olcott to athel.cb@gmail.com    |
   Re: Computing truth values from finite s    |
   05 Jan 26 08:30:57    |
   1k    |
   262397    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 08:22:57    |
   2k    |
   262396    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Why_do_people_ignore_the    |
   05 Jan 26 16:20:05    |
   2k    |
   262395    |
   olcott to All    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Why_do_people_ignore_the_simpl    |
   05 Jan 26 08:04:28    |
   1k    |
   262394    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 11:24:49    |
   1k    |
   262393    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 11:18:09    |
   2k    |
   262392    |
   user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid to All    |
   Re: Computing truth values from finite s    |
   05 Jan 26 09:14:03    |
   1,538b    |
   262391    |
   Jeff Barnett to All    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   04 Jan 26 23:53:32    |
   1,538b    |
   262390    |
   Mild Shock to All    |
   Good Morning, Vietnam! Sudoku 2026 Chall    |
   05 Jan 26 12:13:19    |
   1,538b    |
   262389    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 08:43:54    |
   4k    |
   262388    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 07:46:14    |
   2k    |
   262387    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 07:30:57    |
   2k    |
   262386    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 07:53:44    |
   2k    |
   262385    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 06:22:16    |
   1k    |
   262384    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   04 Jan 26 23:30:22    |
   3k    |
   262383    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 05:11:10    |
   2k    |
   262382    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   04 Jan 26 23:26:56    |
   2,083b    |
   262381    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 04:54:19    |
   1k    |
   262380    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   05 Jan 26 04:42:55    |
   1k    |
   262379    |
   Jeff Barnett to All    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   04 Jan 26 18:48:12    |
   1,296b    |
   262378    |
   Jeff Barnett to All    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   04 Jan 26 15:13:52    |
   1,296b    |
   262377    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   04 Jan 26 18:13:01    |
   6k    |
   262376    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computing truth values from finite s    |
   04 Jan 26 14:45:41    |
   6k    |
   262375    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   04 Jan 26 14:32:37    |
   2k    |
   262374    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   04 Jan 26 14:25:55    |
   7k    |
   262373    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computing truth values from finite s    |
   04 Jan 26 13:56:54    |
   6k    |
   262372    |
   Mike Terry to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   04 Jan 26 18:55:51    |
   6k    |
   262371    |
   olcott to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   04 Jan 26 13:44:34    |
   6k    |
   262370    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computing truth values from finite s    |
   04 Jan 26 12:05:09    |
   4k    |
   262369    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   04 Jan 26 11:59:32    |
   7k    |
   262368    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   03 Jan 26 21:56:12    |
   7k    |
   262367    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computing truth values from finite s    |
   03 Jan 26 20:58:46    |
   3k    |
   262366    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   03 Jan 26 20:53:46    |
   7k    |
   262365    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computing truth values from finite s    |
   03 Jan 26 20:44:30    |
   2k    |
   262364    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   03 Jan 26 20:42:45    |
   7k    |
   262363    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   03 Jan 26 19:48:06    |
   7k    |
   262362    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computing truth values from finite s    |
   03 Jan 26 19:51:43    |
   2k    |
   262361    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computing truth values from finite s    |
   03 Jan 26 18:14:07    |
   2k    |
   262360    |
   Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computing truth values from finite s    |
   04 Jan 26 00:44:33    |
   1k    |
   262359    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   03 Jan 26 18:09:40    |
   1,321b    |
   262358    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   03 Jan 26 18:09:40    |
   7k    |
   262357    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   03 Jan 26 16:57:11    |
   7k    |
   262356    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Computing truth values from finite s    |
   03 Jan 26 16:59:49    |
   1k    |
   262355    |
   Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn to olcott    |
   Re: Key difference between math and the     |
   03 Jan 26 22:20:03    |
   2k    |
   262354    |
   olcott to Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn    |
   Re: Key difference between math and the     |
   03 Jan 26 16:14:15    |
   2k    |
   262353    |
   olcott to All    |
   Computing truth values from finite strin    |
   03 Jan 26 16:15:51    |
   2,319b    |
   262352    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 22:11:36    |
   2k    |
   262351    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 22:03:48    |
   4k    |
   262350    |
   Mike Terry to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 21:39:17    |
   6k    |
   262349    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 21:24:04    |
   2k    |
   262348    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 20:58:57    |
   1k    |
   262347    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   03 Jan 26 14:36:53    |
   6k    |
   262346    |
   Richard Damon to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 14:11:38    |
   6,630b    |
   262345    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 14:24:33    |
   6k    |
   262344    |
   Tristan Wibberley to All    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 18:54:58    |
   2k    |
   262343    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 19:02:00    |
   3k    |
   262342    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 11:30:12    |
   2k    |
   262341    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 17:35:09    |
   1k    |
   262340    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 11:44:07    |
   1,093b    |
   262339    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 16:59:55    |
   1,093b    |
   262338    |
   olcott to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 10:47:55    |
   1,093b    |
   262337    |
   olcott to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 10:47:55    |
   7k    |
   262336    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 16:54:30    |
   2k    |
   262335    |
   Mike Terry to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 16:32:58    |
   5k    |
   262334    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   03 Jan 26 09:32:10    |
   6k    |
   262333    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mike Terry    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 10:31:38    |
   3k    |
   262332    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 10:36:35    |
   1k    |
   262331    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 08:03:07    |
   4k    |
   262330    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   03 Jan 26 07:17:07    |
   1k    |
   262329    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   02 Jan 26 23:09:51    |
   4k    |
   262328    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   02 Jan 26 19:30:23    |
   3k    |
   262327    |
   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 19:43:02    |
   2k    |
   262326    |
   olcott to Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn    |
   Re: Key difference between math and the     |
   02 Jan 26 17:20:54    |
   2k    |
   262325    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The ultimate foundation of [a priori    |
   02 Jan 26 17:10:20    |
   2k    |
   262324    |
   olcott to Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn    |
   Re: Key difference between math and the     |
   02 Jan 26 17:17:25    |
   1k    |
   262323    |
   Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn to olcott    |
   Re: Key difference between math and the     |
   02 Jan 26 23:30:03    |
   1,381b    |
   262322    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Key difference between math and the     |
   02 Jan 26 11:33:36    |
   1k    |
   262321    |
   Mike Terry to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 17:24:08    |
   3k    |
   262320    |
   olcott to All    |
   Key difference between math and the phil    |
   02 Jan 26 10:08:58    |
   2,892b    |
   262319    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 08:44:24    |
   3k    |
   262318    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 08:47:17    |
   4k    |
   262317    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 07:43:59    |
   1k    |
   262316    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 07:40:30    |
   2k    |
   262315    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 23:57:37    |
   3k    |
   262314    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 08:15:22    |
   3k    |
   262313    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 06:14:33    |
   2k    |
   262312    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 06:20:59    |
   3k    |
   262311    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 05:57:33    |
   1k    |
   262310    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 05:37:33    |
   1k    |
   262309    |
   Tristan Wibberley to All    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 05:54:21    |
   2k    |
   262308    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 05:48:03    |
   2k    |
   262307    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 23:20:55    |
   5k    |
   262306    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 22:22:40    |
   2k    |
   262305    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 22:17:17    |
   3k    |
   262304    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 21:33:59    |
   2k    |
   262303    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 21:26:55    |
   3k    |
   262302    |
   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 19:45:55    |
   1k    |
   262301    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 20:38:18    |
   2k    |
   262300    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 20:07:58    |
   1k    |
   262299    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 00:13:35    |
   2k    |
   262298    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 00:10:53    |
   2k    |
   262297    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   02 Jan 26 00:12:33    |
   2k    |
   262296    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 23:19:13    |
   1k    |
   262295    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 23:17:23    |
   1k    |
   262294    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 23:13:50    |
   1k    |
   262293    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   01 Jan 26 16:44:46    |
   5k    |
   262292    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 22:13:48    |
   4,988b    |
   262291    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 22:24:40    |
   5k    |
   262290    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   01 Jan 26 22:12:40    |
   4,619b    |
   262289    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   01 Jan 26 16:05:56    |
   3k    |
   262288    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   01 Jan 26 15:46:53    |
   2k    |
   262287    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   01 Jan 26 14:03:50    |
   2k    |
   262286    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1    |
   01 Jan 26 12:08:32    |
   1k    |
   262285    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots    |
   01 Jan 26 11:59:32    |
   3k    |
   262284    |
   olcott to All    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Boiling_G=C3=B6del=27s_1931_In    |
   01 Jan 26 08:45:19    |
   2,603b    |
   262283    |
   Jeff Barnett to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots    |
   01 Jan 26 01:15:57    |
   2k    |
   262282    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   31 Dec 25 23:03:33    |
   5k    |
   262281    |
   olcott to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots    |
   31 Dec 25 22:59:23    |
   2k    |
   262280    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   31 Dec 25 20:15:21    |
   4k    |
   262279    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   31 Dec 25 19:04:07    |
   4k    |
   262278    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   31 Dec 25 18:23:03    |
   3k    |
   262277    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   31 Dec 25 17:08:00    |
   3k    |
   262276    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   31 Dec 25 16:42:43    |
   2k    |
   262275    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   31 Dec 25 15:59:24    |
   2k    |
   262274    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   31 Dec 25 15:57:58    |
   3k    |
   262273    |
   olcott to Pierre Asselin    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   31 Dec 25 15:52:46    |
   1k    |
   262272    |
   Pierre Asselin to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   31 Dec 25 21:18:18    |
   1,388b    |
   262271    |
   Pierre Asselin to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   31 Dec 25 21:16:39    |
   1,388b    |
   262270    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: The exact meaning of these exact wor    |
   31 Dec 25 14:12:06    |
   1k    |
   262269    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The exact meaning of these exact wor    |
   31 Dec 25 11:51:43    |
   5k    |
   262268    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The exact meaning of these exact wor    |
   31 Dec 25 10:20:26    |
   2k    |
   262267    |
   olcott to All    |
   The exact meaning of these exact words p    |
   30 Dec 25 22:21:51    |
   2,255b    |
   262266    |
   olcott to Jeff Barnett    |
   Re: Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots    |
   30 Dec 25 20:23:15    |
   2k    |
   262265    |
   olcott to Jeff Barnett    |
   Turing-machine decider properly formaliz    |
   30 Dec 25 20:06:27    |
   2k    |
   262264    |
   Pierre Asselin to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   30 Dec 25 23:14:40    |
   2k    |
   262263    |
   Jeff Barnett to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots    |
   30 Dec 25 18:05:02    |
   1k    |
   262262    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 15:41:57    |
   2k    |
   262261    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 15:39:36    |
   1,747b    |
   262260    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 21:34:18    |
   2k    |
   262259    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Bonita Montero    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   30 Dec 25 21:23:30    |
   2,005b    |
   262258    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 21:26:50    |
   1k    |
   262257    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 14:35:29    |
   1k    |
   262256    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 20:22:02    |
   1k    |
   262255    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 13:13:10    |
   5k    |
   262254    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   30 Dec 25 13:11:14    |
   3k    |
   262253    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 13:08:51    |
   2k    |
   262252    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 13:01:19    |
   6k    |
   262251    |
   olcott to Bonita Montero    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   30 Dec 25 12:53:34    |
   2k    |
   262250    |
   Bonita Montero to All    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   30 Dec 25 19:45:58    |
   1k    |
   262249    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   30 Dec 25 09:11:33    |
   1k    |
   262248    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 10:15:55    |
   5k    |
   262247    |
   Mike Terry to joes    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   30 Dec 25 18:18:06    |
   3k    |
   262246    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 09:10:11    |
   2k    |
   262245    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   30 Dec 25 08:56:25    |
   2,178b    |
   262244    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 08:52:11    |
   6k    |
   262243    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 08:32:34    |
   1k    |
   262242    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   30 Dec 25 05:49:34    |
   1k    |
   262241    |
   joes to All    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   30 Dec 25 09:47:48    |
   2k    |
   262240    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   29 Dec 25 23:33:25    |
   4k    |
   262239    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   29 Dec 25 22:35:44    |
   2k    |
   262238    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 23:46:45    |
   2,426b    |
   262237    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_readers_are_conned_into_    |
   29 Dec 25 17:28:26    |
   3k    |
   262236    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?readers_are_conned_into_believ    |
   29 Dec 25 15:38:44    |
   2k    |
   262235    |
   olcott to All    |
   Directed Acyclic Graph's with roots    |
   29 Dec 25 17:07:24    |
   2,484b    |
   262234    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 13:37:48    |
   5k    |
   262233    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 22:35:02    |
   2k    |
   262232    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 20:46:28    |
   1k    |
   262231    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   29 Dec 25 20:36:21    |
   3k    |
   262230    |
   olcott to Bonita Montero    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 14:06:59    |
   2,672b    |
   262229    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   29 Dec 25 20:20:11    |
   3k    |
   262228    |
   Bonita Montero to All    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 20:50:45    |
   3,154b    |
   262227    |
   olcott to Pierre Asselin    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   29 Dec 25 13:32:01    |
   1k    |
   262226    |
   Pierre Asselin to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   29 Dec 25 19:21:08    |
   1,309b    |
   262225    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 19:07:42    |
   2k    |
   262224    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   29 Dec 25 18:42:35    |
   2k    |
   262223    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
   29 Dec 25 12:52:34    |
   2k    |
   262222    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 10:27:30    |
   3k    |
   262221    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 12:37:38    |
   4k    |
   262220    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 10:31:17    |
   3,703b    |
   262219    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 10:31:17    |
   6k    |
   262218    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 13:18:38    |
   6,603b    |
   262217    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 10:39:19    |
   7k    |
   262216    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 09:48:33    |
   6k    |
   262215    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 11:08:03    |
   6,184b    |
   262214    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 16:04:37    |
   2k    |
   262213    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 09:47:29    |
   6k    |
   262212    |
   olcott to Bonita Montero    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 09:25:25    |
   6,438b    |
   262211    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 09:24:01    |
   5k    |
   262210    |
   Bonita Montero to All    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 16:08:15    |
   5,558b    |
   262209    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   29 Dec 25 08:55:19    |
   5k    |
   262208    |
   WM to All    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   28 Dec 25 19:20:30    |
   5,443b    |
   262207    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   28 Dec 25 22:59:57    |
   4k    |
   262206    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   28 Dec 25 18:42:52    |
   3k    |
   262205    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   28 Dec 25 07:49:08    |
   2k    |
   262204    |
   Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   28 Dec 25 06:23:14    |
   1,885b    |
   262203    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   28 Dec 25 07:00:31    |
   2k    |
   262202    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Thought this through for 30,000 hour    |
   27 Dec 25 22:40:18    |
   1k    |
   262201    |
   olcott to All    |
   Thought this through for 30,000 hours ov    |
   27 Dec 25 18:54:33    |
   1,427b    |
   262200    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   27 Dec 25 18:40:32    |
   1,427b    |
   262199    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   27 Dec 25 18:38:29    |
   1,427b    |
   262198    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   27 Dec 25 10:13:53    |
   3k    |
   262197    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   27 Dec 25 11:17:57    |
   2k    |
   262196    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   27 Dec 25 10:57:01    |
   6k    |
   262195    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Proof that the halting problem is incorr    |
   27 Dec 25 10:49:53    |
   6,095b    |
   262194    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   27 Dec 25 09:01:29    |
   2k    |
   262193    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: By what process can we trust the ana    |
   26 Dec 25 22:59:37    |
   1k    |
   262192    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 22:54:40    |
   6k    |
   262191    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: By what process can we trust the ana    |
   27 Dec 25 04:50:37    |
   1k    |
   262190    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: By what process can we trust the ana    |
   26 Dec 25 22:35:36    |
   2k    |
   262189    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: By what process can we trust the ana    |
   26 Dec 25 21:52:46    |
   1k    |
   262188    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 21:48:01    |
   1,346b    |
   262187    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 21:48:01    |
   6k    |
   262186    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 21:22:59    |
   6k    |
   262185    |
   olcott to All    |
   By what process can we trust the analysi    |
   26 Dec 25 21:19:46    |
   6,620b    |
   262184    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 20:38:59    |
   6k    |
   262183    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 19:17:45    |
   6,603b    |
   262182    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 19:17:45    |
   6k    |
   262181    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 12:07:44    |
   5k    |
   262180    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 11:18:57    |
   4k    |
   262179    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 09:20:21    |
   2k    |
   262178    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 10:56:45    |
   3k    |
   262177    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   26 Dec 25 07:54:14    |
   3k    |
   262176    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   25 Dec 25 22:51:56    |
   4k    |
   262175    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   25 Dec 25 21:12:57    |
   3k    |
   262174    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   25 Dec 25 21:37:47    |
   4k    |
   262173    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   25 Dec 25 20:20:28    |
   2k    |
   262172    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   25 Dec 25 19:45:03    |
   1,822b    |
   262171    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   25 Dec 25 19:17:15    |
   1,822b    |
   262170    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   25 Dec 25 18:48:02    |
   1,822b    |
   262169    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Proof that the halting problem is in    |
   25 Dec 25 17:42:34    |
   1,822b    |
   262168    |
   olcott to All    |
   Proof that the halting problem is incorr    |
   25 Dec 25 17:39:26    |
   1,822b    |
   262167    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 21:22:53    |
   3k    |
   262166    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 21:22:53    |
   7k    |
   262165    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 21:22:53    |
   7k    |
   262164    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 21:22:53    |
   7k    |
   262163    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 21:22:53    |
   7k    |
   262162    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 17:30:57    |
   1k    |
   262161    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 17:30:57    |
   7k    |
   262160    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 17:30:57    |
   7k    |
   262159    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 17:30:57    |
   7k    |
   262158    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 17:30:57    |
   7k    |
   262157    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 17:30:57    |
   6k    |
   262156    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 16:11:20    |
   1k    |
   262155    |
   olcott to All    |
   Categorically exhaustive reasoning    |
   24 Dec 25 16:58:26    |
   1,076b    |
   262154    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 16:01:22    |
   4k    |
   262153    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 14:56:33    |
   3k    |
   262152    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The scope of computation defines its    |
   24 Dec 25 14:11:47    |
   1k    |
   262151    |
   olcott to All    |
   The scope of computation defines its tru    |
   24 Dec 25 13:20:16    |
   1,422b    |
   262150    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 12:41:14    |
   5k    |
   262149    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 12:41:14    |
   7k    |
   262148    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 13:04:33    |
   4k    |
   262147    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 13:09:14    |
   2k    |
   262146    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 11:36:22    |
   3k    |
   262145    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 11:36:22    |
   7k    |
   262144    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 10:29:52    |
   4k    |
   262143    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 12:13:03    |
   2k    |
   262142    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 10:59:13    |
   7k    |
   262141    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 10:41:11    |
   5k    |
   262140    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 09:49:52    |
   6k    |
   262139    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 09:49:52    |
   6k    |
   262138    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 10:12:19    |
   3k    |
   262137    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 07:12:17    |
   3k    |
   262136    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 08:48:05    |
   2k    |
   262135    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 08:48:05    |
   7k    |
   262134    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 09:22:16    |
   3k    |
   262133    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   24 Dec 25 09:22:16    |
   6k    |
   262132    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 22:44:08    |
   2k    |
   262131    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 22:44:08    |
   7k    |
   262130    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 23:09:10    |
   6,669b    |
   262129    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 22:02:17    |
   6,669b    |
   262128    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 22:02:17    |
   6k    |
   262127    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 22:01:10    |
   6,650b    |
   262126    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 20:23:13    |
   5k    |
   262125    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 21:44:02    |
   6k    |
   262124    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 18:08:31    |
   4k    |
   262123    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 18:03:02    |
   3k    |
   262122    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 11:24:24    |
   2k    |
   262121    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 11:20:31    |
   2k    |
   262120    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 10:43:23    |
   2k    |
   262119    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Turing-machine deciders a precise de    |
   23 Dec 25 10:32:16    |
   2k    |
   262118    |
   olcott to All    |
   Turing-machine deciders a precise defini    |
   23 Dec 25 09:34:19    |
   1k    |
   262117    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as    |
   23 Dec 25 06:36:27    |
   2k    |
   262116    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as    |
   22 Dec 25 21:54:35    |
   1,594b    |
   262115    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as    |
   22 Dec 25 21:56:24    |
   1k    |
   262114    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as    |
   22 Dec 25 21:17:09    |
   2k    |
   262113    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as    |
   22 Dec 25 21:31:46    |
   3k    |
   262112    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as    |
   22 Dec 25 21:41:37    |
   1k    |
   262111    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as    |
   22 Dec 25 21:20:01    |
   2k    |
   262110    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: I proved the HP input is the same as    |
   22 Dec 25 21:11:29    |
   1k    |
   262109    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I spent 22 years on the notion of un    |
   22 Dec 25 15:56:44    |
   4k    |
   262108    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I spent 22 years on the notion of un    |
   22 Dec 25 15:38:33    |
   2k    |
   262107    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Bonita Montero    |
   Re: Conventional notion of deciders    |
   22 Dec 25 13:34:33    |
   1k    |
   262106    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Conventional notion of deciders    |
   22 Dec 25 20:56:28    |
   2k    |
   262105    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c    |
   22 Dec 25 14:11:34    |
   5k    |
   262104    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c    |
   22 Dec 25 13:46:23    |
   5k    |
   262103    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I spent 22 years on the notion of un    |
   22 Dec 25 14:01:28    |
   2k    |
   262102    |
   Kaz Kylheku to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c    |
   22 Dec 25 19:30:32    |
   2,243b    |
   262101    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I spent 22 years on the notion of un    |
   22 Dec 25 13:09:13    |
   1k    |
   262100    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c    |
   22 Dec 25 13:05:54    |
   3k    |
   262099    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: I spent 22 years on the notion of un    |
   22 Dec 25 12:55:12    |
   3,239b    |
   262098    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c    |
   22 Dec 25 12:35:14    |
   2k    |
   262097    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c    |
   22 Dec 25 12:09:13    |
   2k    |
   262096    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c    |
   22 Dec 25 11:59:52    |
   2k    |
   262095    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo    |
   21 Dec 25 22:26:02    |
   3k    |
   262094    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c    |
   22 Dec 25 11:30:50    |
   2k    |
   262093    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c    |
   22 Dec 25 11:19:47    |
   1,756b    |
   262092    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c    |
   22 Dec 25 19:11:56    |
   1,756b    |
   262091    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   22 Dec 25 10:31:08    |
   6k    |
   262090    |
   olcott to Bonita Montero    |
   Re: Conventional notion of deciders    |
   22 Dec 25 10:30:10    |
   1k    |
   262089    |
   Bonita Montero to All    |
   Re: Conventional notion of deciders    |
   22 Dec 25 16:22:12    |
   1k    |
   262088    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   21 Dec 25 22:24:33    |
   6k    |
   262087    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo    |
   21 Dec 25 21:22:46    |
   3k    |
   262086    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   21 Dec 25 21:19:40    |
   6k    |
   262085    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo    |
   21 Dec 25 20:57:30    |
   2k    |
   262084    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   21 Dec 25 20:38:33    |
   5k    |
   262083    |
   olcott to Mr Flibble    |
   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo    |
   21 Dec 25 20:08:07    |
   2k    |
   262082    |
   Mr Flibble to olcott    |
   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo    |
   22 Dec 25 01:35:56    |
   1,691b    |
   262081    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   21 Dec 25 19:13:36    |
   4k    |
   262080    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo    |
   21 Dec 25 18:57:30    |
   3k    |
   262079    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   21 Dec 25 18:59:25    |
   3k    |
   262078    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo    |
   21 Dec 25 18:53:31    |
   3k    |
   262077    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo    |
   21 Dec 25 18:38:36    |
   2k    |
   262076    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo    |
   21 Dec 25 18:33:39    |
   2k    |
   262075    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo    |
   21 Dec 25 18:15:07    |
   2k    |
   262074    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   21 Dec 25 18:05:03    |
   2k    |
   262073    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: D correctly simulated by H proved fo    |
   21 Dec 25 18:00:39    |
   2k    |
   262072    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   21 Dec 25 16:39:01    |
   2k    |
   262071    |
   olcott to Bonita Montero    |
   Re: Conventional notion of deciders    |
   21 Dec 25 16:36:08    |
   1k    |
   262070    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   21 Dec 25 21:37:40    |
   1k    |
   262069    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Bonita Montero    |
   Re: Conventional notion of deciders    |
   21 Dec 25 12:18:43    |
   1,240b    |
   262068    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   21 Dec 25 19:59:00    |
   1k    |
   262067    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The fundamental nature of computatio    |
   21 Dec 25 12:38:38    |
   1,304b    |
   262066    |
   Bonita Montero to All    |
   Re: Conventional notion of deciders    |
   21 Dec 25 19:34:15    |
   1,304b    |
   262065    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   21 Dec 25 09:16:43    |
   4k    |
   262064    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   21 Dec 25 09:00:22    |
   2k    |
   262063    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   21 Dec 25 08:12:14    |
   2,489b    |
   262062    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   21 Dec 25 08:12:14    |
   6k    |
   262061    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The fundamental nature of computatio    |
   21 Dec 25 08:57:24    |
   6k    |
   262060    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   21 Dec 25 08:49:26    |
   6k    |
   262059    |
   olcott to All    |
   Conventional notion of deciders    |
   21 Dec 25 08:37:22    |
   6,647b    |
   262058    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   21 Dec 25 13:11:05    |
   6k    |
   262057    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   21 Dec 25 12:38:31    |
   1k    |
   262056    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   The fundamental nature of computational     |
   20 Dec 25 20:33:18    |
   4k    |
   262055    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   20 Dec 25 18:03:37    |
   2k    |
   262054    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 17:56:00    |
   6k    |
   262053    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   20 Dec 25 17:45:29    |
   2k    |
   262052    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   20 Dec 25 17:47:06    |
   2k    |
   262051    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   20 Dec 25 17:28:38    |
   1k    |
   262050    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 17:26:31    |
   5k    |
   262049    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   20 Dec 25 17:25:05    |
   1k    |
   262048    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 16:55:21    |
   5k    |
   262047    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 15:36:01    |
   3k    |
   262046    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 16:05:51    |
   3k    |
   262045    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 14:56:31    |
   2k    |
   262044    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 14:19:02    |
   2k    |
   262043    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 13:22:22    |
   1k    |
   262042    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: Turing machines can not run other Tu    |
   20 Dec 25 10:35:34    |
   1k    |
   262041    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 08:54:42    |
   1k    |
   262040    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The most definitive measure of the b    |
   20 Dec 25 08:51:08    |
   5k    |
   262039    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The most definitive measure of the b    |
   20 Dec 25 08:07:59    |
   3k    |
   262038    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: Turing machines can not run other Tu    |
   20 Dec 25 07:42:23    |
   3,466b    |
   262037    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 07:49:55    |
   3,466b    |
   262036    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   20 Dec 25 05:54:51    |
   6k    |
   262035    |
   olcott to All    |
   Turing machines can not run other Turing    |
   20 Dec 25 07:09:16    |
   5,671b    |
   262034    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 05:44:17    |
   5,671b    |
   262033    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 05:58:23    |
   5,671b    |
   262032    |
   olcott to All    |
   Three page proof that the Halting Proble    |
   20 Dec 25 06:07:49    |
   5,671b    |
   262031    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   20 Dec 25 12:22:00    |
   5k    |
   262030    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   19 Dec 25 21:21:35    |
   3k    |
   262029    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   20 Dec 25 12:07:54    |
   2,675b    |
   262028    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: How do halt deciders really work? --    |
   19 Dec 25 19:49:54    |
   2,675b    |
   262027    |
   olcott to All    |
   How do halt deciders really work? --- AK    |
   19 Dec 25 19:27:44    |
   2,675b    |
   262026    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   19 Dec 25 17:46:34    |
   1k    |
   262025    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   19 Dec 25 22:38:09    |
   1k    |
   262024    |
   dart200 to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   19 Dec 25 11:16:55    |
   2k    |
   262023    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   19 Dec 25 10:13:00    |
   4k    |
   262022    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   19 Dec 25 08:52:47    |
   5k    |
   262021    |
   wm to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   19 Dec 25 13:38:11    |
   2k    |
   262020    |
   dart200 to All    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   19 Dec 25 00:25:49    |
   5k    |
   262019    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   19 Dec 25 12:16:58    |
   1k    |
   262018    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   18 Dec 25 22:14:18    |
   3k    |
   262017    |
   dart200 to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   18 Dec 25 21:54:05    |
   4k    |
   262016    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   18 Dec 25 21:36:08    |
   3k    |
   262015    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   18 Dec 25 20:25:04    |
   3k    |
   262014    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   18 Dec 25 20:46:05    |
   3k    |
   262013    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: on what are you even crying about ri    |
   18 Dec 25 19:06:14    |
   3k    |
   262012    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   18 Dec 25 19:11:38    |
   2k    |
   262011    |
   dart200 to polcott    |
   Re: on what are you even crying about ri    |
   18 Dec 25 16:54:34    |
   2k    |
   262010    |
   polcott to All    |
   Re: on what are you even crying about ri    |
   18 Dec 25 18:45:00    |
   2k    |
   262009    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   18 Dec 25 17:38:09    |
   1k    |
   262008    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   18 Dec 25 22:04:55    |
   1k    |
   262007    |
   wm to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   18 Dec 25 18:44:17    |
   2k    |
   262006    |
   Julio Di Egidio to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   18 Dec 25 18:53:24    |
   2k    |
   262005    |
   WM to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   18 Dec 25 19:25:35    |
   1k    |
   262004    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   18 Dec 25 12:51:13    |
   3k    |
   262003    |
   Julio Di Egidio to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   18 Dec 25 15:59:34    |
   1k    |
   262002    |
   WM to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   18 Dec 25 12:57:50    |
   1k    |
   262001    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   18 Dec 25 07:02:08    |
   2k    |
   262000    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   18 Dec 25 07:04:55    |
   3k    |
   261999    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   18 Dec 25 06:43:38    |
   2k    |
   261998    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   18 Dec 25 12:36:33    |
   3k    |
   261997    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   18 Dec 25 12:20:51    |
   1k    |
   261996    |
   WM to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   18 Dec 25 12:53:40    |
   1,217b    |
   261995    |
   Julio Di Egidio to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   18 Dec 25 10:04:07    |
   1,217b    |
   261994    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   18 Dec 25 12:33:29    |
   2k    |
   261993    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   17 Dec 25 23:26:01    |
   3k    |
   261992    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   17 Dec 25 22:57:34    |
   3k    |
   261991    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   17 Dec 25 22:38:13    |
   1k    |
   261990    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   17 Dec 25 12:18:28    |
   1,057b    |
   261989    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Mikko    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   17 Dec 25 12:06:06    |
   1,057b    |
   261988    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   17 Dec 25 11:09:11    |
   2k    |
   261987    |
   wm to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   17 Dec 25 19:22:28    |
   2,160b    |
   261986    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   17 Dec 25 08:06:34    |
   3k    |
   261985    |
   olcott to Richard Heathfield    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   17 Dec 25 09:31:06    |
   2k    |
   261984    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: DD simulated by HHH specifies non-ha    |
   17 Dec 25 07:48:48    |
   5k    |
   261983    |
   Mikko to Chris M. Thomasson    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   17 Dec 25 12:44:09    |
   5,277b    |
   261982    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   17 Dec 25 07:33:09    |
   1k    |
   261981    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: DD simulated by HHH specifies non-ha    |
   17 Dec 25 10:45:50    |
   2k    |
   261980    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The primary first principle of all T    |
   17 Dec 25 11:00:26    |
   1k    |
   261979    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   17 Dec 25 12:49:01    |
   7k    |
   261978    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Dark Points    |
   17 Dec 25 12:10:45    |
   6,753b    |
   261977    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   17 Dec 25 12:41:39    |
   3k    |
   261976    |
   Mikko to Richard Heathfield    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   17 Dec 25 12:32:56    |
   1k    |
   261975    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The most definitive measure of the b    |
   17 Dec 25 12:01:13    |
   2k    |
   261974    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The most definitive measure of the b    |
   17 Dec 25 12:01:13    |
   7k    |
   261973    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   17 Dec 25 12:21:45    |
   2k    |
   261972    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   17 Dec 25 12:07:07    |
   2k    |
   261971    |
   olcott to All    |
   The primary first principle of all Turin    |
   16 Dec 25 21:36:16    |
   2,249b    |
   261970    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   DD simulated by HHH specifies non-haltin    |
   16 Dec 25 18:33:19    |
   2,249b    |
   261969    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   The most definitive measure of the behav    |
   16 Dec 25 11:30:01    |
   2k    |
   261968    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   The most definitive measure of the behav    |
   16 Dec 25 11:30:01    |
   7k    |
   261967    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon    |
   Re: on just search the literature bruh    |
   16 Dec 25 12:05:46    |
   3k    |
   261966    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: on just search the literature bruh    |
   16 Dec 25 18:15:53    |
   1k    |
   261965    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   The most definitive measure of the behav    |
   16 Dec 25 11:21:18    |
   1k    |
   261964    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: on just search the literature bruh    |
   16 Dec 25 11:00:13    |
   1,112b    |
   261963    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   16 Dec 25 11:48:45    |
   1k    |
   261962    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   16 Dec 25 11:48:45    |
   7k    |
   261961    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   16 Dec 25 11:44:40    |
   7k    |
   261960    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: on just search the literature bruh    |
   15 Dec 25 22:40:05    |
   6,740b    |
   261959    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   15 Dec 25 21:47:57    |
   6,740b    |
   261958    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   15 Dec 25 22:53:45    |
   4k    |
   261957    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   15 Dec 25 19:31:39    |
   3k    |
   261956    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   15 Dec 25 12:51:26    |
   3,057b    |
   261955    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 12:58:02    |
   2k    |
   261954    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: on just search the literature bruh (    |
   15 Dec 25 14:42:07    |
   5k    |
   261953    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 14:16:22    |
   3k    |
   261952    |
   wm to All    |
   Dark Points    |
   15 Dec 25 18:18:01    |
   2,639b    |
   261951    |
   olcott to Richard Heathfield    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 10:34:46    |
   1k    |
   261950    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   15 Dec 25 10:13:58    |
   4k    |
   261949    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 10:03:21    |
   1k    |
   261948    |
   Richard Heathfield to Mikko    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 16:20:56    |
   1,399b    |
   261947    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   15 Dec 25 10:20:07    |
   4k    |
   261946    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts (3/3)    |
   15 Dec 25 09:56:24    |
   3k    |
   261945    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)    |
   15 Dec 25 09:56:24    |
   7k    |
   261944    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   15 Dec 25 09:49:18    |
   6k    |
   261943    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts (3/3)    |
   15 Dec 25 09:42:32    |
   2k    |
   261942    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)    |
   15 Dec 25 09:42:32    |
   7k    |
   261941    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 15:12:34    |
   1k    |
   261940    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 08:20:53    |
   5k    |
   261939    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   15 Dec 25 08:31:33    |
   3k    |
   261938    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   15 Dec 25 08:10:03    |
   3k    |
   261937    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   15 Dec 25 08:05:45    |
   2k    |
   261936    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   15 Dec 25 07:53:31    |
   4k    |
   261935    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   15 Dec 25 08:03:04    |
   6k    |
   261934    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 08:01:26    |
   1k    |
   261933    |
   Mikko to Richard Heathfield    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 12:08:35    |
   1k    |
   261932    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   15 Dec 25 12:15:31    |
   2k    |
   261931    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts (3/3)    |
   15 Dec 25 11:48:16    |
   1,646b    |
   261930    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)    |
   15 Dec 25 11:48:16    |
   7k    |
   261929    |
   Mikko to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Best First Principle of Turing Machi    |
   15 Dec 25 11:56:39    |
   7,527b    |
   261928    |
   Mikko to polcott    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)    |
   15 Dec 25 11:44:00    |
   6k    |
   261927    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   15 Dec 25 11:52:07    |
   7k    |
   261926    |
   Mikko to polcott    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   15 Dec 25 11:31:27    |
   1k    |
   261925    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   15 Dec 25 11:24:01    |
   2k    |
   261924    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   15 Dec 25 11:20:33    |
   2k    |
   261923    |
   Richard Heathfield to Mikko    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 09:14:12    |
   1k    |
   261922    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   15 Dec 25 11:10:14    |
   2k    |
   261921    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 10:53:46    |
   1,982b    |
   261920    |
   Tristan Wibberley to polcott    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   15 Dec 25 08:09:26    |
   4k    |
   261919    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   15 Dec 25 11:04:46    |
   1k    |
   261918    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   15 Dec 25 11:04:46    |
   7k    |
   261917    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   15 Dec 25 06:20:03    |
   1k    |
   261916    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   14 Dec 25 21:32:54    |
   3k    |
   261915    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   14 Dec 25 19:11:37    |
   3k    |
   261914    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   14 Dec 25 19:17:40    |
   2k    |
   261913    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: Exactly what halt deciders actually     |
   14 Dec 25 18:51:27    |
   1k    |
   261912    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   14 Dec 25 18:39:01    |
   2k    |
   261911    |
   olcott to All    |
   Exactly what halt deciders actually do    |
   14 Dec 25 18:31:01    |
   1,964b    |
   261910    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   14 Dec 25 18:15:03    |
   2k    |
   261909    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   14 Dec 25 17:46:09    |
   2k    |
   261908    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   14 Dec 25 17:14:35    |
   1k    |
   261907    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   14 Dec 25 17:14:35    |
   6k    |
   261906    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   14 Dec 25 17:39:14    |
   3k    |
   261905    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   14 Dec 25 14:57:23    |
   2k    |
   261904    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   14 Dec 25 19:03:29    |
   2k    |
   261903    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   14 Dec 25 10:32:15    |
   1k    |
   261902    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   14 Dec 25 10:25:51    |
   1k    |
   261901    |
   polcott to joes    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   14 Dec 25 09:34:13    |
   2k    |
   261900    |
   polcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   14 Dec 25 10:16:26    |
   3k    |
   261899    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   14 Dec 25 12:51:33    |
   2k    |
   261898    |
   Mikko to polcott    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   14 Dec 25 13:02:40    |
   2k    |
   261897    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   14 Dec 25 13:05:33    |
   5k    |
   261896    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Best First Principle of Turing Machi    |
   14 Dec 25 12:54:20    |
   2k    |
   261895    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   14 Dec 25 12:46:49    |
   1k    |
   261894    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem itself is unequi    |
   14 Dec 25 12:38:50    |
   1,397b    |
   261893    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   14 Dec 25 12:12:29    |
   2k    |
   261892    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   14 Dec 25 12:43:47    |
   1k    |
   261891    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   14 Dec 25 12:05:28    |
   7k    |
   261890    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   14 Dec 25 04:58:42    |
   2k    |
   261889    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   14 Dec 25 04:29:57    |
   2k    |
   261888    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   13 Dec 25 22:16:10    |
   5k    |
   261887    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   13 Dec 25 21:39:48    |
   5k    |
   261886    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   13 Dec 25 20:30:05    |
   3k    |
   261885    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Defining a halt decider with perfect    |
   13 Dec 25 16:41:47    |
   1k    |
   261884    |
   olcott to All    |
   Defining a halt decider with perfect acc    |
   13 Dec 25 15:32:26    |
   1,523b    |
   261883    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   13 Dec 25 15:23:08    |
   2k    |
   261882    |
   olcott to All    |
   The halting problem itself is unequivoca    |
   13 Dec 25 15:07:25    |
   1,674b    |
   261881    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   13 Dec 25 14:13:40    |
   1k    |
   261880    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   13 Dec 25 14:19:01    |
   1k    |
   261879    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   13 Dec 25 13:50:57    |
   1k    |
   261878    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   13 Dec 25 13:47:36    |
   1k    |
   261877    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   13 Dec 25 11:38:06    |
   1,078b    |
   261876    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   13 Dec 25 19:28:06    |
   1k    |
   261875    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The correct foundation of the theory    |
   13 Dec 25 19:33:40    |
   2k    |
   261874    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   13 Dec 25 18:25:37    |
   1k    |
   261873    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   13 Dec 25 11:36:32    |
   2k    |
   261872    |
   Tristan Wibberley to polcott    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   13 Dec 25 16:59:53    |
   2k    |
   261871    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Best First Principle of Turing Machi    |
   13 Dec 25 10:49:42    |
   1,999b    |
   261870    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Best First Principle of Turing Machi    |
   13 Dec 25 16:35:29    |
   1,999b    |
   261869    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   13 Dec 25 09:55:43    |
   6k    |
   261868    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts (3/3)    |
   13 Dec 25 10:22:04    |
   6,625b    |
   261867    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)    |
   13 Dec 25 10:22:04    |
   7k    |
   261866    |
   olcott to All    |
   The correct foundation of the theory of     |
   13 Dec 25 10:44:06    |
   1k    |
   261865    |
   dart200 to polcott    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/3)    |
   13 Dec 25 08:01:08    |
   6k    |
   261864    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Best First Principle of Turing Machine c    |
   13 Dec 25 09:50:39    |
   2k    |
   261863    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   13 Dec 25 09:47:37    |
   2k    |
   261862    |
   polcott to All    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts (2/2)    |
   13 Dec 25 07:15:48    |
   6k    |
   261861    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   13 Dec 25 08:43:27    |
   7k    |
   261860    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   13 Dec 25 13:05:55    |
   7k    |
   261859    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   13 Dec 25 12:58:32    |
   2k    |
   261858    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   13 Dec 25 12:46:10    |
   2k    |
   261857    |
   Mikko to As I already    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   13 Dec 25 12:19:37    |
   1,551b    |
   261856    |
   Mikko to As I already    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   13 Dec 25 12:19:37    |
   7k    |
   261855    |
   polcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 23:10:18    |
   6,731b    |
   261854    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   13 Dec 25 04:43:25    |
   1k    |
   261853    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 21:11:35    |
   4k    |
   261852    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 19:27:06    |
   3k    |
   261851    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 18:40:07    |
   3k    |
   261850    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 15:30:18    |
   3k    |
   261849    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 17:02:02    |
   3k    |
   261848    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 16:36:34    |
   2k    |
   261847    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 16:07:18    |
   2k    |
   261846    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 15:33:49    |
   1k    |
   261845    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 14:55:22    |
   5k    |
   261844    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 13:35:17    |
   4k    |
   261843    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 10:54:06    |
   3k    |
   261842    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 09:04:26    |
   2k    |
   261841    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 08:29:38    |
   1k    |
   261840    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 08:27:41    |
   2k    |
   261839    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   12 Dec 25 08:19:10    |
   6k    |
   261838    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   12 Dec 25 13:16:43    |
   1k    |
   261837    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   12 Dec 25 06:48:14    |
   2k    |
   261836    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Proof of halting problem category er    |
   12 Dec 25 10:56:14    |
   2,514b    |
   261835    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   12 Dec 25 10:50:14    |
   6k    |
   261834    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   12 Dec 25 10:46:39    |
   3k    |
   261833    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   11 Dec 25 19:50:23    |
   3,484b    |
   261832    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   12 Dec 25 10:27:55    |
   4k    |
   261831    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   12 Dec 25 10:31:00    |
   1k    |
   261830    |
   olcott to All    |
   Proof of halting problem category error     |
   11 Dec 25 22:01:49    |
   1,223b    |
   261829    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   11 Dec 25 19:48:49    |
   1k    |
   261828    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   11 Dec 25 19:44:17    |
   3k    |
   261827    |
   HAL 9000 to polcott    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   12 Dec 25 01:42:41    |
   3,373b    |
   261826    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   11 Dec 25 19:06:28    |
   3k    |
   261825    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   11 Dec 25 23:28:16    |
   2k    |
   261824    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Very simple first principles showing the    |
   11 Dec 25 08:38:24    |
   2k    |
   261823    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Very simple first principles showing the    |
   11 Dec 25 08:42:41    |
   2k    |
   261822    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   11 Dec 25 08:17:40    |
   6k    |
   261821    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   11 Dec 25 08:15:22    |
   3k    |
   261820    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   11 Dec 25 07:47:17    |
   2k    |
   261819    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   11 Dec 25 11:09:26    |
   1k    |
   261818    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   11 Dec 25 11:00:01    |
   1,323b    |
   261817    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se    |
   11 Dec 25 10:53:36    |
   3k    |
   261816    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   11 Dec 25 10:42:16    |
   5k    |
   261815    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   11 Dec 25 10:40:07    |
   2k    |
   261814    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   10 Dec 25 21:33:33    |
   1k    |
   261813    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Very simple first principles showing    |
   10 Dec 25 20:19:47    |
   1,485b    |
   261812    |
   olcott to All    |
   Very simple first principles showing the    |
   10 Dec 25 20:00:27    |
   1,485b    |
   261811    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   10 Dec 25 18:10:12    |
   2k    |
   261810    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   10 Dec 25 14:01:54    |
   2k    |
   261809    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   10 Dec 25 10:29:12    |
   2k    |
   261808    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se    |
   10 Dec 25 10:27:45    |
   3k    |
   261807    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   10 Dec 25 10:14:10    |
   2k    |
   261806    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   10 Dec 25 08:10:58    |
   5k    |
   261805    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   10 Dec 25 07:04:13    |
   5,207b    |
   261804    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   10 Dec 25 12:10:48    |
   2k    |
   261803    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se    |
   10 Dec 25 12:14:43    |
   2k    |
   261802    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   10 Dec 25 12:04:06    |
   2k    |
   261801    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   10 Dec 25 11:43:47    |
   2,437b    |
   261800    |
   polcott to polcott    |
   Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
   09 Dec 25 17:36:33    |
   1k    |
   261799    |
   polcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   09 Dec 25 12:04:45    |
   2k    |
   261798    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO    |
   09 Dec 25 09:53:11    |
   3k    |
   261797    |
   polcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   09 Dec 25 10:22:53    |
   3k    |
   261796    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Key new insight into halting undecid    |
   09 Dec 25 10:05:23    |
   4k    |
   261795    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO    |
   09 Dec 25 09:39:50    |
   3k    |
   261794    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   09 Dec 25 15:15:37    |
   2k    |
   261793    |
   dart200 to polcott    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO    |
   08 Dec 25 20:54:27    |
   1,752b    |
   261792    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO    |
   08 Dec 25 22:51:37    |
   2k    |
   261791    |
   polcott to All    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO    |
   08 Dec 25 23:02:20    |
   1k    |
   261790    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Key new insight into halting undecid    |
   08 Dec 25 22:30:22    |
   4k    |
   261789    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO    |
   08 Dec 25 22:33:16    |
   1k    |
   261788    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Key new insight into halting undecid    |
   08 Dec 25 21:50:55    |
   3k    |
   261787    |
   polcott to All    |
   Re: on mathematical ghosts --- PLO    |
   08 Dec 25 22:00:50    |
   2,966b    |
   261786    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Key new insight into halting undecid    |
   08 Dec 25 21:16:55    |
   2k    |
   261785    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Key new insight into halting undecidabil    |
   08 Dec 25 20:34:41    |
   1k    |
   261784    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   08 Dec 25 19:00:09    |
   4k    |
   261783    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   08 Dec 25 13:44:50    |
   6k    |
   261782    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   08 Dec 25 13:56:15    |
   6k    |
   261781    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   08 Dec 25 13:49:38    |
   3k    |
   261780    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   08 Dec 25 13:05:36    |
   6k    |
   261779    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se    |
   08 Dec 25 10:39:37    |
   2k    |
   261778    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   08 Dec 25 13:12:43    |
   2k    |
   261777    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   08 Dec 25 13:09:41    |
   2k    |
   261776    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   08 Dec 25 10:41:40    |
   1k    |
   261775    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se    |
   08 Dec 25 13:00:33    |
   3k    |
   261774    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   08 Dec 25 12:47:20    |
   4k    |
   261773    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   08 Dec 25 10:25:12    |
   2k    |
   261772    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   08 Dec 25 10:18:23    |
   3k    |
   261771    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   08 Dec 25 07:59:02    |
   1k    |
   261770    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   08 Dec 25 11:13:00    |
   2k    |
   261769    |
   olcott to Mike Terry    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 11:38:42    |
   6k    |
   261768    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   08 Dec 25 11:18:36    |
   5,774b    |
   261767    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   08 Dec 25 11:08:14    |
   7k    |
   261766    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se    |
   08 Dec 25 11:04:29    |
   2k    |
   261765    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   08 Dec 25 07:07:44    |
   1k    |
   261764    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The Halting Problem violates this se    |
   08 Dec 25 06:51:28    |
   1k    |
   261763    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   08 Dec 25 06:36:27    |
   1k    |
   261762    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   08 Dec 25 06:12:56    |
   2k    |
   261761    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 21:26:43    |
   3k    |
   261760    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 21:21:53    |
   3,226b    |
   261759    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   07 Dec 25 21:17:19    |
   3,226b    |
   261758    |
   olcott to All    |
   The Halting Problem violates this self-e    |
   07 Dec 25 21:14:39    |
   3,226b    |
   261757    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   08 Dec 25 02:14:58    |
   3,226b    |
   261756    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   08 Dec 25 02:04:33    |
   1k    |
   261755    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   08 Dec 25 01:26:26    |
   1k    |
   261754    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 17:15:19    |
   3k    |
   261753    |
   HAL 9000 to olcott    |
   Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I ha    |
   07 Dec 25 18:07:26    |
   2k    |
   261752    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   07 Dec 25 11:15:26    |
   6k    |
   261751    |
   Mike Terry to Python    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 15:49:54    |
   5k    |
   261750    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 08:59:06    |
   4k    |
   261749    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 09:16:22    |
   5k    |
   261748    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 09:03:31    |
   3k    |
   261747    |
   olcott to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I ha    |
   07 Dec 25 08:53:09    |
   6k    |
   261746    |
   olcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 07:37:24    |
   1k    |
   261745    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   07 Dec 25 14:07:28    |
   1k    |
   261744    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   07 Dec 25 13:28:43    |
   1,039b    |
   261743    |
   Mikko to Above you    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   07 Dec 25 13:08:41    |
   5k    |
   261742    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is inc    |
   07 Dec 25 13:11:45    |
   5,363b    |
   261741    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   07 Dec 25 13:02:57    |
   2k    |
   261740    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   07 Dec 25 12:55:16    |
   7k    |
   261739    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 12:47:41    |
   4k    |
   261738    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   07 Dec 25 12:50:18    |
   7k    |
   261737    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 12:42:45    |
   3k    |
   261736    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   07 Dec 25 12:39:32    |
   4k    |
   261735    |
   polcott to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   06 Dec 25 21:50:55    |
   4k    |
   261734    |
   olcott to All    |
   Halting Problem Proof Counter-Example is    |
   06 Dec 25 17:37:07    |
   1k    |
   261733    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   06 Dec 25 11:29:38    |
   1,106b    |
   261732    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   06 Dec 25 11:29:38    |
   6k    |
   261731    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   06 Dec 25 08:41:13    |
   6,654b    |
   261730    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   06 Dec 25 08:41:13    |
   7k    |
   261729    |
   olcott to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I ha    |
   06 Dec 25 10:58:30    |
   2k    |
   261728    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   06 Dec 25 11:00:30    |
   2,540b    |
   261727    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: I am first to have fully refuted the    |
   06 Dec 25 11:00:30    |
   6k    |
   261726    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I ha    |
   06 Dec 25 07:49:55    |
   2k    |
   261725    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   06 Dec 25 06:53:15    |
   5k    |
   261724    |
   HAL 9000 to olcott    |
   Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I ha    |
   06 Dec 25 13:17:25    |
   5,045b    |
   261723    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   06 Dec 25 07:14:30    |
   2k    |
   261722    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   06 Dec 25 13:03:10    |
   2k    |
   261721    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   06 Dec 25 06:50:22    |
   2k    |
   261720    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   06 Dec 25 06:46:45    |
   6k    |
   261719    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   06 Dec 25 06:45:13    |
   6k    |
   261718    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   06 Dec 25 06:40:21    |
   4k    |
   261717    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   06 Dec 25 06:33:07    |
   4k    |
   261716    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   06 Dec 25 06:24:17    |
   4k    |
   261715    |
   olcott to All    |
   I am first to have fully refuted the Hal    |
   06 Dec 25 06:16:49    |
   6k    |
   261714    |
   olcott to Julio Di Egidio    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Attacking_the_Busy_Beave    |
   06 Dec 25 06:19:49    |
   1k    |
   261713    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   06 Dec 25 06:08:51    |
   2k    |
   261712    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   06 Dec 25 11:39:45    |
   4k    |
   261711    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   06 Dec 25 11:23:38    |
   1k    |
   261710    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   06 Dec 25 11:30:35    |
   2k    |
   261709    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   06 Dec 25 11:21:20    |
   6k    |
   261708    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   06 Dec 25 11:19:14    |
   7k    |
   261707    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   06 Dec 25 11:01:02    |
   3k    |
   261706    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   06 Dec 25 10:53:41    |
   3k    |
   261705    |
   Julio Di Egidio to All    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Attacking_the_Busy_Beave    |
   06 Dec 25 09:31:35    |
   3,334b    |
   261704    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   06 Dec 25 10:37:59    |
   3k    |
   261703    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   06 Dec 25 08:24:56    |
   2k    |
   261702    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   05 Dec 25 21:18:32    |
   2k    |
   261701    |
   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   05 Dec 25 19:57:10    |
   1k    |
   261700    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   05 Dec 25 19:53:19    |
   6k    |
   261699    |
   olcott to All    |
   Every rebuttal of anything that I have e    |
   05 Dec 25 19:38:09    |
   6,417b    |
   261698    |
   olcott to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   05 Dec 25 17:45:14    |
   2k    |
   261697    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   05 Dec 25 17:03:10    |
   6k    |
   261696    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   05 Dec 25 16:24:04    |
   1k    |
   261695    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   The episode told everything about the Ch    |
   05 Dec 25 20:10:48    |
   3k    |
   261694    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   The French Square Wheele Bicycle of Logi    |
   05 Dec 25 20:01:26    |
   2k    |
   261693    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   05 Dec 25 11:43:41    |
   2k    |
   261692    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   05 Dec 25 11:40:45    |
   6k    |
   261691    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   05 Dec 25 11:31:22    |
   4k    |
   261690    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   05 Dec 25 11:30:18    |
   3k    |
   261689    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   05 Dec 25 11:21:56    |
   3k    |
   261688    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   05 Dec 25 11:00:56    |
   2k    |
   261687    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   05 Dec 25 10:41:51    |
   3k    |
   261686    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   05 Dec 25 10:49:08    |
   2k    |
   261685    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   05 Dec 25 11:38:11    |
   1k    |
   261684    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   05 Dec 25 11:13:14    |
   7k    |
   261683    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   05 Dec 25 11:03:50    |
   4k    |
   261682    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   05 Dec 25 09:30:02    |
   3,989b    |
   261681    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   05 Dec 25 10:52:34    |
   3k    |
   261680    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   05 Dec 25 10:57:50    |
   2k    |
   261679    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   05 Dec 25 10:48:17    |
   3k    |
   261678    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   04 Dec 25 08:46:14    |
   3k    |
   261677    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   04 Dec 25 08:18:23    |
   4k    |
   261676    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   04 Dec 25 08:15:10    |
   1k    |
   261675    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   04 Dec 25 08:10:43    |
   6k    |
   261674    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   04 Dec 25 08:06:48    |
   1k    |
   261673    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Most generically exactly what is a p    |
   04 Dec 25 12:01:21    |
   1k    |
   261672    |
   Mild Shock to All    |
   Philosophize not God, Philosophize the D    |
   04 Dec 25 11:28:23    |
   1,365b    |
   261671    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Most generically exactly what is a p    |
   04 Dec 25 11:41:40    |
   1k    |
   261670    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   04 Dec 25 11:17:52    |
   1,258b    |
   261669    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   04 Dec 25 11:17:52    |
   7k    |
   261668    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   04 Dec 25 11:17:52    |
   7k    |
   261667    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   04 Dec 25 11:29:19    |
   3k    |
   261666    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   04 Dec 25 11:07:05    |
   5k    |
   261665    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   03 Dec 25 20:39:07    |
   1k    |
   261664    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   04 Dec 25 02:32:10    |
   1k    |
   261663    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   03 Dec 25 20:30:43    |
   1k    |
   261662    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   03 Dec 25 20:07:29    |
   1k    |
   261661    |
   olcott to Andy Walker    |
   Olcott is provably correct --- no one ca    |
   03 Dec 25 19:50:41    |
   2k    |
   261660    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   03 Dec 25 19:59:51    |
   2,196b    |
   261659    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   03 Dec 25 18:24:03    |
   5k    |
   261658    |
   olcott to Richard Heathfield    |
   Olcott is provably correct --- no one ca    |
   03 Dec 25 19:47:00    |
   2k    |
   261657    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Olcott is provably correct --- no one ca    |
   03 Dec 25 19:44:48    |
   2k    |
   261656    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Olcott is provably correct --- no on    |
   03 Dec 25 18:28:38    |
   2k    |
   261655    |
   olcott to Andy Walker    |
   The quality of reviewers on USENET    |
   03 Dec 25 18:11:07    |
   2k    |
   261654    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   03 Dec 25 10:13:53    |
   3k    |
   261653    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   03 Dec 25 10:27:12    |
   1k    |
   261652    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   03 Dec 25 10:27:12    |
   7k    |
   261651    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   03 Dec 25 10:27:12    |
   6k    |
   261650    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Most generically exactly what is a p    |
   03 Dec 25 10:06:12    |
   1k    |
   261649    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   03 Dec 25 09:59:49    |
   3k    |
   261648    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   03 Dec 25 10:11:20    |
   6k    |
   261647    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   03 Dec 25 12:53:17    |
   5k    |
   261646    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   03 Dec 25 13:34:01    |
   7k    |
   261645    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   03 Dec 25 13:34:01    |
   7k    |
   261644    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   03 Dec 25 13:17:20    |
   3k    |
   261643    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Most generically exactly what is a p    |
   03 Dec 25 12:47:42    |
   2,824b    |
   261642    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   03 Dec 25 12:41:03    |
   2k    |
   261641    |
   x to Julio Di Egidio    |
   Re: symbolic logic means nothing nowaday    |
   03 Dec 25 02:29:19    |
   1,583b    |
   261640    |
   Mild Shock to Julio Di Egidio    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Attacking_the_Busy_Beaver_5_[1    |
   03 Dec 25 09:08:43    |
   6k    |
   261639    |
   Mild Shock to All    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?The_size_of_a_G=c3=b6del_sente    |
   03 Dec 25 08:55:08    |
   1k    |
   261638    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   What Spock aka Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn    |
   03 Dec 25 01:08:12    |
   4k    |
   261637    |
   Mild Shock to olcott    |
   Different Hubble Theories: de Sitter Ene    |
   03 Dec 25 01:04:16    |
   3k    |
   261636    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   BB(5) also used proof theoretic methods     |
   03 Dec 25 00:19:52    |
   3k    |
   261635    |
   olcott to Mild Shock    |
   BB(googolplex ^ googolplex) ???    |
   02 Dec 25 17:51:07    |
   2k    |
   261634    |
   Mild Shock to olcott    |
   Pot Head Olcott: BB(5) is only S(5)=47,1    |
   03 Dec 25 00:42:18    |
   2k    |
   261633    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency -    |
   02 Dec 25 17:32:51    |
   1k    |
   261632    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   productivity is a principle for coinduct    |
   03 Dec 25 00:26:55    |
   3k    |
   261631    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (    |
   02 Dec 25 15:13:10    |
   3,582b    |
   261630    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (    |
   02 Dec 25 17:05:50    |
   3,582b    |
   261629    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   02 Dec 25 08:14:13    |
   7k    |
   261628    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   02 Dec 25 08:14:13    |
   6k    |
   261627    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   02 Dec 25 09:26:39    |
   2k    |
   261626    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   02 Dec 25 07:22:50    |
   2k    |
   261625    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   02 Dec 25 08:00:35    |
   3k    |
   261624    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   02 Dec 25 08:07:19    |
   3k    |
   261623    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   02 Dec 25 11:07:08    |
   6k    |
   261622    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   02 Dec 25 11:07:08    |
   7k    |
   261621    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   02 Dec 25 11:56:12    |
   2k    |
   261620    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   02 Dec 25 11:26:29    |
   2k    |
   261619    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Most generically exactly what is a p    |
   02 Dec 25 11:15:29    |
   1,580b    |
   261618    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   02 Dec 25 11:49:39    |
   1k    |
   261617    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   02 Dec 25 10:53:07    |
   1k    |
   261616    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   01 Dec 25 20:01:19    |
   3k    |
   261615    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   02 Dec 25 01:59:37    |
   1k    |
   261614    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   01 Dec 25 19:50:55    |
   4k    |
   261613    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   02 Dec 25 01:39:18    |
   3k    |
   261612    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 16:41:45    |
   2,567b    |
   261611    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   02 Dec 25 01:13:51    |
   2k    |
   261610    |
   Mild Shock to Jeff Barnett    |
   Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth bus    |
   02 Dec 25 00:14:18    |
   3k    |
   261609    |
   Jeff Barnett to All    |
   Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth bus    |
   01 Dec 25 14:29:19    |
   2,780b    |
   261608    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   01 Dec 25 11:04:30    |
   2k    |
   261607    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   01 Dec 25 17:37:05    |
   3k    |
   261606    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   01 Dec 25 13:44:13    |
   4k    |
   261605    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   01 Dec 25 11:15:11    |
   1k    |
   261604    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 10:27:34    |
   5k    |
   261603    |
   Tristan Wibberley to dbush    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   01 Dec 25 16:55:26    |
   2k    |
   261602    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 09:39:31    |
   4k    |
   261601    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 09:55:53    |
   4k    |
   261600    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 09:29:48    |
   3k    |
   261599    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 09:19:35    |
   2k    |
   261598    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 09:26:00    |
   3k    |
   261597    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   01 Dec 25 09:18:03    |
   2k    |
   261596    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 08:57:17    |
   2k    |
   261595    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   01 Dec 25 14:45:27    |
   1k    |
   261594    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 08:38:47    |
   1k    |
   261593    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 06:47:03    |
   6k    |
   261592    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 06:47:03    |
   6k    |
   261591    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: on deciding this sentence is false    |
   01 Dec 25 06:43:36    |
   1k    |
   261590    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Olcott is provably correct    |
   01 Dec 25 06:22:28    |
   2k    |
   261589    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Olcott is provably correct --- no on    |
   01 Dec 25 06:41:05    |
   2k    |
   261588    |
   olcott to All    |
   Most generically exactly what is a proof    |
   01 Dec 25 06:27:20    |
   1,779b    |
   261587    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   01 Dec 25 06:19:53    |
   2k    |
   261586    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 12:45:00    |
   5k    |
   261585    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   01 Dec 25 12:45:00    |
   7k    |
   261584    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   Wake-up call until everybody gets ear-bl    |
   01 Dec 25 12:00:44    |
   2k    |
   261583    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   01 Dec 25 13:02:52    |
   2,138b    |
   261582    |
   Mild Shock to Julio Di Egidio    |
   What is analog computing nowadays? (Was:    |
   01 Dec 25 11:24:06    |
   2k    |
   261581    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: on deciding this sentence is false    |
   01 Dec 25 11:42:54    |
   1,724b    |
   261580    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Olcott is provably correct --- no on    |
   01 Dec 25 11:39:12    |
   1,724b    |
   261579    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: Olcott is provably correct --- no on    |
   01 Dec 25 05:34:39    |
   2k    |
   261578    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Olcott is provably correct    |
   01 Dec 25 11:31:24    |
   2k    |
   261577    |
   Julio Di Egidio to Mild Shock    |
   Re: symbolic logic means nothing nowaday    |
   30 Nov 25 23:17:11    |
   1,892b    |
   261576    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Olcott is provably correct --- no on    |
   30 Nov 25 20:12:59    |
   2k    |
   261575    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: Olcott is provably correct    |
   01 Dec 25 01:44:55    |
   1k    |
   261574    |
   Mild Shock to All    |
   symbolic logic means nothing nowadays (W    |
   30 Nov 25 22:21:46    |
   1,247b    |
   261573    |
   Ross Finlayson to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   30 Nov 25 10:33:00    |
   1,247b    |
   261572    |
   olcott to All    |
   Olcott is provably correct    |
   30 Nov 25 10:52:15    |
   2k    |
   261571    |
   Julio Di Egidio to Rich D    |
   The rational reasoner    |
   30 Nov 25 16:16:30    |
   4k    |
   261570    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   The entire body of general knowledge tha    |
   30 Nov 25 09:58:42    |
   3k    |
   261569    |
   Mild Shock to All    |
   Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy be    |
   30 Nov 25 13:36:52    |
   2k    |
   261568    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   When put in virtual jail, ask for remova    |
   30 Nov 25 12:55:11    |
   5k    |
   261567    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   30 Nov 25 12:19:00    |
   4k    |
   261566    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   How to get GigaLIPS for Transitive Closu    |
   30 Nov 25 11:20:09    |
   5k    |
   261565    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   30 Nov 25 12:14:30    |
   7k    |
   261564    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   30 Nov 25 12:07:35    |
   6k    |
   261563    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   30 Nov 25 11:58:51    |
   4k    |
   261562    |
   Mild Shock to Julio Di Egidio    |
   SWI Agent Provocateur gets kicked out of    |
   30 Nov 25 10:28:04    |
   3k    |
   261561    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   30 Nov 25 11:22:00    |
   5k    |
   261560    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   30 Nov 25 11:16:06    |
   1k    |
   261559    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   30 Nov 25 11:12:46    |
   2k    |
   261558    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   30 Nov 25 11:10:29    |
   3k    |
   261557    |
   Julio Di Egidio to Julio Di Egidio    |
   Re: Coq/Rocq and how to completely break    |
   30 Nov 25 10:00:15    |
   3k    |
   261556    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Compete finite set of axioms of gene    |
   30 Nov 25 00:46:20    |
   2,707b    |
   261555    |
   Julio Di Egidio to Julio Di Egidio    |
   Re: Coq/Rocq and how to completely break    |
   30 Nov 25 09:52:14    |
   2k    |
   261554    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: Compete finite set of axioms of gene    |
   30 Nov 25 06:40:07    |
   2,141b    |
   261553    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Compete finite set of axioms of gene    |
   29 Nov 25 22:43:31    |
   6k    |
   261552    |
   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Compete finite set of axioms of gene    |
   29 Nov 25 22:43:48    |
   5,704b    |
   261551    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Compete finite set of axioms of gene    |
   29 Nov 25 20:22:24    |
   5k    |
   261550    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 19:50:26    |
   5,115b    |
   261549    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 15:20:29    |
   5,115b    |
   261548    |
   olcott to Mike Terry    |
   The body of knowledge expressed in langu    |
   29 Nov 25 21:17:53    |
   6k    |
   261547    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 19:49:14    |
   2k    |
   261546    |
   olcott to All    |
   Compete finite set of axioms of general     |
   29 Nov 25 19:50:36    |
   5k    |
   261545    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 16:35:13    |
   1k    |
   261544    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 15:53:03    |
   2k    |
   261543    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 17:24:22    |
   2k    |
   261542    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 17:19:39    |
   3k    |
   261541    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 22:57:29    |
   2k    |
   261540    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 22:44:10    |
   5k    |
   261539    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Is Goldbach conjecture a NPC problem    |
   29 Nov 25 16:30:43    |
   4k    |
   261538    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Mikko    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   29 Nov 25 14:37:50    |
   1k    |
   261537    |
   dart200 to Richard Damon    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 14:16:44    |
   2k    |
   261536    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 16:01:44    |
   2k    |
   261535    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 17:04:59    |
   6k    |
   261534    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 15:59:00    |
   5k    |
   261533    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: on deciding this sentence is false    |
   29 Nov 25 15:46:38    |
   5k    |
   261532    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 21:53:57    |
   2k    |
   261531    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 15:31:26    |
   4k    |
   261530    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 15:31:26    |
   6k    |
   261529    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 21:39:23    |
   4k    |
   261528    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 14:56:46    |
   2k    |
   261527    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 14:56:46    |
   6k    |
   261526    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 14:51:11    |
   3k    |
   261525    |
   Alan Mackenzie to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 20:48:31    |
   2k    |
   261524    |
   Alan Mackenzie to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 20:48:31    |
   7k    |
   261523    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 20:39:27    |
   7k    |
   261522    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 20:23:52    |
   2k    |
   261521    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   29 Nov 25 14:58:09    |
   6k    |
   261520    |
   olcott to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 13:33:25    |
   5k    |
   261519    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   29 Nov 25 13:16:23    |
   3k    |
   261518    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   29 Nov 25 11:00:49    |
   3k    |
   261517    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: on "Nothing is final"    |
   29 Nov 25 13:00:02    |
   3k    |
   261516    |
   dart200 to Mikko    |
   on "Nothing is final"    |
   29 Nov 25 10:53:14    |
   2k    |
   261515    |
   dbush to olcott    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 13:19:49    |
   2,427b    |
   261514    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: A new category of thought    |
   29 Nov 25 12:07:37    |
   2k    |
   261513    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   29 Nov 25 12:01:47    |
   4k    |
   261512    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   29 Nov 25 10:45:04    |
   6k    |
   261511    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 11:57:01    |
   3k    |
   261510    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 11:54:09    |
   5k    |
   261509    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: on deciding this sentence is false    |
   29 Nov 25 10:59:19    |
   1k    |
   261508    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   29 Nov 25 10:40:33    |
   6k    |
   261507    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   29 Nov 25 10:42:48    |
   4k    |
   261506    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   29 Nov 25 10:38:26    |
   5k    |
   261505    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   29 Nov 25 10:38:26    |
   6k    |
   261504    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   29 Nov 25 10:10:24    |
   2k    |
   261503    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 08:20:43    |
   2k    |
   261502    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 08:20:43    |
   6k    |
   261501    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   29 Nov 25 10:04:14    |
   3k    |
   261500    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 09:18:26    |
   6k    |
   261499    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 08:43:16    |
   2k    |
   261498    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   6k    |
   261497    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261496    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261495    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261494    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261493    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261492    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261491    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261490    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261489    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261488    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261487    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261486    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261485    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261484    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261483    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261482    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261481    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261480    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261479    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261478    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261477    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261476    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261475    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261474    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261473    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261472    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261471    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261470    |
   Ross Finlayson to And you    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:23    |
   7k    |
   261469    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7,579b    |
   261468    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261467    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261466    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261465    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261464    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261463    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261462    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261461    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261460    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261459    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261458    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261457    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261456    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261455    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261454    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261453    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   29 Nov 25 03:54:06    |
   7k    |
   261452    |
   Alan Mackenzie to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 11:55:14    |
   4k    |
   261451    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   29 Nov 25 12:31:21    |
   3k    |
   261450    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 12:17:43    |
   4k    |
   261449    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   29 Nov 25 12:20:25    |
   3k    |
   261448    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   29 Nov 25 11:48:00    |
   5k    |
   261447    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   29 Nov 25 11:40:59    |
   4k    |
   261446    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   29 Nov 25 11:44:50    |
   6k    |
   261445    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: on deciding this sentence is false    |
   29 Nov 25 11:51:50    |
   6,504b    |
   261444    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   29 Nov 25 11:27:32    |
   5k    |
   261443    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   29 Nov 25 11:27:32    |
   7k    |
   261442    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   29 Nov 25 10:55:46    |
   2k    |
   261441    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   29 Nov 25 11:06:27    |
   1k    |
   261440    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   29 Nov 25 10:48:04    |
   2k    |
   261439    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 05:52:41    |
   6k    |
   261438    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   28 Nov 25 23:05:02    |
   5k    |
   261437    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   28 Nov 25 21:25:06    |
   4k    |
   261436    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 04:17:13    |
   4k    |
   261435    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: Done with Olcott. --- Kaz cannot thi    |
   29 Nov 25 02:58:58    |
   3k    |
   261434    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   28 Nov 25 17:28:18    |
   2,589b    |
   261433    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to FromTheRafters    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   28 Nov 25 17:06:11    |
   2k    |
   261432    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to FromTheRafters    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   28 Nov 25 16:57:32    |
   2k    |
   261431    |
   FromTheRafters to All    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   28 Nov 25 19:49:14    |
   2k    |
   261430    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   28 Nov 25 16:31:58    |
   1k    |
   261429    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   28 Nov 25 16:43:44    |
   1,070b    |
   261428    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   28 Nov 25 16:42:40    |
   2k    |
   261427    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   28 Nov 25 15:58:44    |
   1,835b    |
   261426    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   28 Nov 25 17:14:05    |
   5k    |
   261425    |
   Alan Mackenzie to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   28 Nov 25 22:54:20    |
   4k    |
   261424    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   A new foundation for correct reasoning +    |
   28 Nov 25 16:03:01    |
   3k    |
   261423    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   28 Nov 25 13:21:34    |
   3k    |
   261422    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   28 Nov 25 12:40:25    |
   2k    |
   261421    |
   Alan Mackenzie to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   28 Nov 25 18:51:58    |
   2k    |
   261420    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   28 Nov 25 10:59:44    |
   6k    |
   261419    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: on deciding this sentence is false    |
   28 Nov 25 12:20:28    |
   2k    |
   261418    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   28 Nov 25 12:10:25    |
   2k    |
   261417    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   28 Nov 25 17:22:02    |
   2k    |
   261416    |
   Alan Mackenzie to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   28 Nov 25 17:32:27    |
   1,826b    |
   261415    |
   dart200 to Mikko    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   28 Nov 25 09:29:33    |
   2k    |
   261414    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   28 Nov 25 09:51:02    |
   5k    |
   261413    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   28 Nov 25 09:54:05    |
   3k    |
   261412    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   28 Nov 25 09:21:03    |
   3k    |
   261411    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   28 Nov 25 09:16:59    |
   6k    |
   261410    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   28 Nov 25 09:18:39    |
   5k    |
   261409    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   28 Nov 25 08:52:48    |
   6k    |
   261408    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   28 Nov 25 08:54:28    |
   4k    |
   261407    |
   polcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   28 Nov 25 08:03:52    |
   2k    |
   261406    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   The halting problem is incorrect two dif    |
   28 Nov 25 08:46:06    |
   5k    |
   261405    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   The halting problem is incorrect two dif    |
   28 Nov 25 08:46:06    |
   6k    |
   261404    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   28 Nov 25 10:40:36    |
   3k    |
   261403    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   28 Nov 25 11:01:55    |
   3k    |
   261402    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   28 Nov 25 10:58:46    |
   4k    |
   261401    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   28 Nov 25 10:36:00    |
   5k    |
   261400    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   28 Nov 25 10:35:03    |
   6k    |
   261399    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   28 Nov 25 10:29:05    |
   3k    |
   261398    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   28 Nov 25 10:18:38    |
   7k    |
   261397    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   28 Nov 25 10:14:21    |
   3k    |
   261396    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   28 Nov 25 10:14:21    |
   7k    |
   261395    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   27 Nov 25 21:51:20    |
   1k    |
   261394    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   27 Nov 25 21:51:20    |
   7k    |
   261393    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   27 Nov 25 21:51:20    |
   7k    |
   261392    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   27 Nov 25 21:51:20    |
   7k    |
   261391    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   27 Nov 25 21:51:20    |
   7k    |
   261390    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   27 Nov 25 21:51:20    |
   7k    |
   261389    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: Meta: a usenet server just for sci.m    |
   27 Nov 25 21:51:20    |
   7k    |
   261388    |
   Ross Finlayson to The Starmaker    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/3    |
   27 Nov 25 22:07:06    |
   7k    |
   261387    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   28 Nov 25 10:06:57    |
   1k    |
   261386    |
   Kaz Kylheku to Richard Damon    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   27 Nov 25 18:37:09    |
   2k    |
   261385    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   27 Nov 25 18:07:33    |
   2,438b    |
   261384    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   27 Nov 25 18:24:07    |
   1k    |
   261383    |
   olcott to olcott    |
   Re: Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   27 Nov 25 10:28:54    |
   1k    |
   261382    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   27 Nov 25 09:43:43    |
   3k    |
   261381    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   27 Nov 25 09:48:17    |
   3k    |
   261380    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   27 Nov 25 09:31:53    |
   4k    |
   261379    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   27 Nov 25 09:21:37    |
   6k    |
   261378    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   27 Nov 25 09:17:55    |
   3k    |
   261377    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   27 Nov 25 09:16:05    |
   6k    |
   261376    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   27 Nov 25 08:59:41    |
   2k    |
   261375    |
   olcott to All    |
   Final Resolution of the Liar Paradox    |
   27 Nov 25 08:36:42    |
   1k    |
   261374    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   An NPU could give 1000x more LIPS (An NP    |
   27 Nov 25 14:21:39    |
   3k    |
   261373    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   27 Nov 25 09:30:16    |
   5k    |
   261372    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Mikko    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   27 Nov 25 00:39:24    |
   5,513b    |
   261371    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   27 Nov 25 10:22:40    |
   5,513b    |
   261370    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   27 Nov 25 10:17:10    |
   3k    |
   261369    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   27 Nov 25 10:00:46    |
   2k    |
   261368    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 23:58:17    |
   3k    |
   261367    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 23:58:17    |
   7k    |
   261366    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   27 Nov 25 09:56:58    |
   3k    |
   261365    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   27 Nov 25 09:49:55    |
   2k    |
   261364    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   27 Nov 25 09:49:55    |
   7k    |
   261363    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   27 Nov 25 09:40:11    |
   2k    |
   261362    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 22:18:43    |
   1k    |
   261361    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 23:00:01    |
   4k    |
   261360    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   27 Nov 25 06:51:01    |
   4k    |
   261359    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   26 Nov 25 22:33:22    |
   4,275b    |
   261358    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 22:16:56    |
   1k    |
   261357    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/3    |
   26 Nov 25 22:16:14    |
   2k    |
   261356    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/3    |
   26 Nov 25 22:16:14    |
   7k    |
   261355    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/3    |
   26 Nov 25 22:16:14    |
   7k    |
   261354    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Heathfield    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 22:15:45    |
   6,671b    |
   261353    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 22:14:11    |
   1k    |
   261352    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 21:59:44    |
   1,039b    |
   261351    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 22:01:30    |
   1k    |
   261350    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 21:58:44    |
   2k    |
   261349    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 21:56:41    |
   2k    |
   261348    |
   Ross Finlayson to The Starmaker    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/3    |
   26 Nov 25 20:56:42    |
   4k    |
   261347    |
   Ross Finlayson to The Starmaker    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/3    |
   26 Nov 25 20:56:42    |
   7k    |
   261346    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 21:54:33    |
   2k    |
   261345    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 22:31:19    |
   2k    |
   261344    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 22:39:52    |
   1k    |
   261343    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   27 Nov 25 04:15:19    |
   1k    |
   261342    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   27 Nov 25 04:19:06    |
   1,498b    |
   261341    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Richard Damon    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 19:43:46    |
   5k    |
   261340    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 20:05:26    |
   4,963b    |
   261339    |
   polcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 22:10:49    |
   5k    |
   261338    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 20:03:52    |
   4,693b    |
   261337    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 19:36:50    |
   4k    |
   261336    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 20:26:47    |
   5k    |
   261335    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 20:37:18    |
   5k    |
   261334    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 19:47:15    |
   4k    |
   261333    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 19:42:02    |
   4k    |
   261332    |
   dbush to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 20:02:34    |
   3k    |
   261331    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 18:51:19    |
   3k    |
   261330    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   27 Nov 25 00:39:26    |
   4k    |
   261329    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 18:20:03    |
   3k    |
   261328    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/3    |
   26 Nov 25 15:15:33    |
   1k    |
   261327    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/3    |
   26 Nov 25 15:15:33    |
   7k    |
   261326    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/3    |
   26 Nov 25 15:15:33    |
   7k    |
   261325    |
   dbush to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 18:00:03    |
   2k    |
   261324    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 23:55:50    |
   2k    |
   261323    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 16:48:49    |
   2k    |
   261322    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 22:19:42    |
   2k    |
   261321    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   26 Nov 25 15:50:07    |
   1,539b    |
   261320    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   26 Nov 25 15:54:59    |
   1,539b    |
   261319    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/3    |
   26 Nov 25 14:15:35    |
   1k    |
   261318    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/3    |
   26 Nov 25 14:15:35    |
   7k    |
   261317    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/3    |
   26 Nov 25 14:15:35    |
   7k    |
   261316    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 15:53:05    |
   1k    |
   261315    |
   Kaz Kylheku to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   26 Nov 25 21:49:38    |
   1,396b    |
   261314    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   26 Nov 25 21:42:50    |
   1,396b    |
   261313    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   26 Nov 25 14:04:02    |
   1k    |
   261312    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   26 Nov 25 14:07:35    |
   1,293b    |
   261311    |
   dbush to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 14:58:53    |
   1,293b    |
   261310    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 13:55:13    |
   1k    |
   261309    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   26 Nov 25 19:46:27    |
   1k    |
   261308    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   26 Nov 25 19:43:16    |
   1k    |
   261307    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 19:34:08    |
   1k    |
   261306    |
   dbush to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 14:40:47    |
   1,295b    |
   261305    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Chris M. Thomasson    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 19:23:10    |
   1k    |
   261304    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 19:16:59    |
   1,287b    |
   261303    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/2    |
   26 Nov 25 10:58:47    |
   2k    |
   261302    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   26 Nov 25 09:39:06    |
   3k    |
   261301    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 18:35:43    |
   2,843b    |
   261300    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   26 Nov 25 09:54:28    |
   3k    |
   261299    |
   Richard Damon to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 10:29:37    |
   2k    |
   261298    |
   dbush to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 10:20:30    |
   2k    |
   261297    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   26 Nov 25 09:20:24    |
   3k    |
   261296    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 09:15:47    |
   3k    |
   261295    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 09:13:19    |
   5k    |
   261294    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 09:17:29    |
   2k    |
   261293    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 09:17:29    |
   6k    |
   261292    |
   dbush to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 10:04:54    |
   1k    |
   261291    |
   Mild Shock to Kaz Kylheku    |
   The Implicit Mechanism of Attention (sic    |
   26 Nov 25 14:11:05    |
   1k    |
   261290    |
   dbush to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 10:06:37    |
   1k    |
   261289    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 08:58:39    |
   5k    |
   261288    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 08:53:53    |
   1k    |
   261287    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 08:44:50    |
   6k    |
   261286    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 11:03:14    |
   2k    |
   261285    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   26 Nov 25 12:17:45    |
   2k    |
   261284    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   26 Nov 25 13:37:05    |
   2k    |
   261283    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 12:01:28    |
   1k    |
   261282    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   26 Nov 25 12:01:28    |
   7k    |
   261281    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 11:22:06    |
   2k    |
   261280    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 11:05:29    |
   4k    |
   261279    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 10:50:05    |
   2k    |
   261278    |
   Richard Heathfield to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 05:53:21    |
   2,336b    |
   261277    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 05:18:35    |
   2,336b    |
   261276    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:30:21    |
   2,336b    |
   261275    |
   Kaz Kylheku to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 05:16:19    |
   2k    |
   261274    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:11:18    |
   7k    |
   261273    |
   dart200 to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:55:19    |
   2k    |
   261272    |
   dart200 to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:56:18    |
   1,881b    |
   261271    |
   dart200 to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:23:25    |
   1,881b    |
   261270    |
   dart200 to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:22:01    |
   1k    |
   261269    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 22:18:14    |
   1k    |
   261268    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 22:06:28    |
   3k    |
   261267    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 22:01:32    |
   4k    |
   261266    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:50:05    |
   2k    |
   261265    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:45:35    |
   2k    |
   261264    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:33:51    |
   1k    |
   261263    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:32:51    |
   2k    |
   261262    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:30:31    |
   2k    |
   261261    |
   Kaz Kylheku to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 03:30:05    |
   1k    |
   261260    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:28:18    |
   1,280b    |
   261259    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 03:27:21    |
   1k    |
   261258    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 03:26:08    |
   2k    |
   261257    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:22:58    |
   2k    |
   261256    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:24:33    |
   4k    |
   261255    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 19:22:46    |
   1k    |
   261254    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:21:47    |
   1k    |
   261253    |
   Kaz Kylheku to All    |
   Hey look, Mentifex passed away in 2004    |
   26 Nov 25 03:20:21    |
   1,339b    |
   261252    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:19:45    |
   1k    |
   261251    |
   Kaz Kylheku to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 03:19:03    |
   1,324b    |
   261250    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:17:15    |
   2k    |
   261249    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 03:16:23    |
   2,177b    |
   261248    |
   dart200 to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 19:16:08    |
   4k    |
   261247    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 03:09:39    |
   2k    |
   261246    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:11:13    |
   1,691b    |
   261245    |
   dart200 to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 19:08:53    |
   1k    |
   261244    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:06:18    |
   1k    |
   261243    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 21:01:34    |
   6k    |
   261242    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:59:39    |
   4k    |
   261241    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:46:35    |
   5k    |
   261240    |
   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 19:45:25    |
   4k    |
   261239    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:45:04    |
   3,685b    |
   261238    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:43:59    |
   1k    |
   261237    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:41:49    |
   3k    |
   261236    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 02:36:46    |
   3,574b    |
   261235    |
   dart200 to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 18:38:16    |
   2k    |
   261234    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:37:46    |
   2,311b    |
   261233    |
   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 19:36:18    |
   3k    |
   261232    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:36:02    |
   3k    |
   261231    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 02:34:46    |
   3,416b    |
   261230    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:34:09    |
   4k    |
   261229    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:30:16    |
   3k    |
   261228    |
   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 19:12:04    |
   2k    |
   261227    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:08:43    |
   2k    |
   261226    |
   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 19:00:10    |
   2k    |
   261225    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 20:03:07    |
   2k    |
   261224    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 19:43:11    |
   3k    |
   261223    |
   =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?= to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 18:29:32    |
   1k    |
   261222    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 19:19:09    |
   2k    |
   261221    |
   dart200 to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 17:09:05    |
   7k    |
   261220    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 18:52:59    |
   1k    |
   261219    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   26 Nov 25 00:47:54    |
   1,407b    |
   261218    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 18:40:26    |
   6k    |
   261217    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 18:38:21    |
   5k    |
   261216    |
   dart200 to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 16:29:01    |
   7k    |
   261215    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 18:14:12    |
   2k    |
   261214    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 18:00:39    |
   6k    |
   261213    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 17:21:43    |
   6k    |
   261212    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 13:30:43    |
   6,642b    |
   261211    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 13:27:08    |
   7k    |
   261210    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 15:27:05    |
   6k    |
   261209    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 15:09:02    |
   6k    |
   261208    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Olcott creates a new foundation for auto    |
   25 Nov 25 13:22:21    |
   6,612b    |
   261207    |
   olcott to Python    |
   Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
   25 Nov 25 15:01:01    |
   6k    |
   261206    |
   olcott to All    |
   New formal foundation for correct reason    |
   25 Nov 25 14:20:48    |
   2k    |
   261205    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   25 Nov 25 08:21:49    |
   2k    |
   261204    |
   polcott to olcott    |
   Re: Transforming Logic into a system of     |
   25 Nov 25 13:06:24    |
   1,767b    |
   261203    |
   olcott to All    |
   Transforming Logic into a system of corr    |
   24 Nov 25 09:47:32    |
   1,767b    |
   261202    |
   Mikko to All    |
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
   25 Nov 25 11:40:54    |
   1,767b    |
   261201    |
   olcott to All    |
   A new foundation for correct reasoning    |
   24 Nov 25 18:53:47    |
   1,767b    |
   261200    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: halting problem counter example H/D     |
   23 Nov 25 04:11:47    |
   1k    |
   261199    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: halting problem counter example H/D     |
   22 Nov 25 07:16:25    |
   1k    |
   261198    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: halting problem counter example H/D     |
   22 Nov 25 11:14:05    |
   2k    |
   261197    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: halting problem counter example H/D     |
   22 Nov 25 17:44:48    |
   3k    |
   261196    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   4k    |
   261195    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   7k    |
   261194    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   7k    |
   261193    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   7k    |
   261192    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   7k    |
   261191    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   7k    |
   261190    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   7k    |
   261189    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   7k    |
   261188    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   7k    |
   261187    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   7k    |
   261186    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   7k    |
   261185    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   22 Nov 25 00:28:18    |
   7k    |
   261184    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261183    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261182    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261181    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261180    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261179    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261178    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261177    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261176    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261175    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261174    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261173    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:56:48    |
   7k    |
   261172    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   5k    |
   261171    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   7k    |
   261170    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   7k    |
   261169    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   7k    |
   261168    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   7k    |
   261167    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   7k    |
   261166    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   7k    |
   261165    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   7k    |
   261164    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   7k    |
   261163    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   7k    |
   261162    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   7k    |
   261161    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:54:34    |
   7k    |
   261160    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:52:17    |
   3k    |
   261159    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:52:17    |
   7k    |
   261158    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:52:17    |
   7k    |
   261157    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:52:17    |
   7k    |
   261156    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:52:17    |
   7k    |
   261155    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:52:17    |
   7k    |
   261154    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:47:36    |
   2k    |
   261153    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:47:36    |
   7k    |
   261152    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:47:36    |
   7k    |
   261151    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:47:36    |
   7k    |
   261150    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:47:36    |
   7k    |
   261149    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:47:36    |
   7k    |
   261148    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:47:36    |
   7k    |
   261147    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: A-Theory and The Atlas of Independen    |
   21 Nov 25 22:47:36    |
   7k    |
   261146    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (5/5    |
   21 Nov 25 22:06:23    |
   1k    |
   261145    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/5    |
   21 Nov 25 22:06:23    |
   7k    |
   261144    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/5    |
   21 Nov 25 22:06:23    |
   7k    |
   261143    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/5    |
   21 Nov 25 22:06:23    |
   7k    |
   261142    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/5    |
   21 Nov 25 22:06:23    |
   7k    |
   261141    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li    |
   20 Nov 25 22:00:20    |
   1k    |
   261140    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: halting problem counter example H/D     |
   22 Nov 25 04:26:17    |
   1k    |
   261139    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li    |
   21 Nov 25 13:50:02    |
   1,180b    |
   261138    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/4    |
   21 Nov 25 11:31:13    |
   6k    |
   261137    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/4    |
   21 Nov 25 11:31:13    |
   7k    |
   261136    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/4    |
   21 Nov 25 11:31:13    |
   7k    |
   261135    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/4    |
   21 Nov 25 10:39:18    |
   6k    |
   261134    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/4    |
   21 Nov 25 10:39:18    |
   7k    |
   261133    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/4    |
   21 Nov 25 10:39:18    |
   7k    |
   261132    |
   olcott to All    |
   Making True(Language L, Expression E) al    |
   21 Nov 25 09:09:37    |
   3k    |
   261131    |
   olcott to All    |
   Making True(Language L, Expression E) al    |
   21 Nov 25 09:09:37    |
   6k    |
   261130    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: halting problem shows that "true on     |
   21 Nov 25 09:23:09    |
   3k    |
   261129    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Mike Terry    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   20 Nov 25 18:10:23    |
   2k    |
   261128    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li    |
   21 Nov 25 01:28:24    |
   2k    |
   261127    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (11/    |
   20 Nov 25 13:10:00    |
   7k    |
   261126    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (10/    |
   20 Nov 25 13:10:00    |
   7k    |
   261125    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (9/1    |
   20 Nov 25 13:10:00    |
   7k    |
   261124    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (8/1    |
   20 Nov 25 13:10:00    |
   7k    |
   261123    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (7/1    |
   20 Nov 25 13:10:00    |
   7k    |
   261122    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (6/1    |
   20 Nov 25 13:10:00    |
   7k    |
   261121    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (5/1    |
   20 Nov 25 13:10:00    |
   7k    |
   261120    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/1    |
   20 Nov 25 13:10:00    |
   7k    |
   261119    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/1    |
   20 Nov 25 13:10:00    |
   7k    |
   261118    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/1    |
   20 Nov 25 13:10:00    |
   7k    |
   261117    |
   The Starmaker to starmaker@ix.netcom.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/1    |
   20 Nov 25 13:10:00    |
   7k    |
   261116    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i    |
   20 Nov 25 14:56:01    |
   2k    |
   261115    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li    |
   21 Nov 25 01:14:49    |
   1k    |
   261114    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i    |
   20 Nov 25 22:10:07    |
   2k    |
   261113    |
   Kaz Kylheku to user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   20 Nov 25 22:06:10    |
   2k    |
   261112    |
   dart200 to Richard Heathfield    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   20 Nov 25 13:35:46    |
   2k    |
   261111    |
   dart200 to Mike Terry    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   20 Nov 25 13:50:07    |
   3k    |
   261110    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott    |
   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i    |
   20 Nov 25 13:22:18    |
   3,204b    |
   261109    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li    |
   20 Nov 25 20:49:03    |
   1k    |
   261108    |
   Mike Terry to All    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   20 Nov 25 20:53:19    |
   6k    |
   261107    |
   Richard Heathfield to Mike Terry    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   20 Nov 25 21:09:50    |
   6,238b    |
   261106    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   20 Nov 25 20:24:10    |
   4k    |
   261105    |
   Kaz Kylheku to user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   20 Nov 25 19:55:55    |
   2k    |
   261104    |
   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   20 Nov 25 12:03:05    |
   3k    |
   261103    |
   J. J. Lodder to Python    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic"    |
   20 Nov 25 12:41:36    |
   2,747b    |
   261102    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   20 Nov 25 07:22:33    |
   1k    |
   261101    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li    |
   19 Nov 25 21:24:46    |
   4k    |
   261100    |
   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox    |
   19 Nov 25 21:01:34    |
   4k    |
   261099    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i    |
   19 Nov 25 22:57:20    |
   1k    |
   261098    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i    |
   20 Nov 25 04:42:48    |
   1,257b    |
   261097    |
   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   19 Nov 25 19:53:42    |
   2k    |
   261096    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i    |
   19 Nov 25 21:12:21    |
   2,309b    |
   261095    |
   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   19 Nov 25 18:49:50    |
   1k    |
   261094    |
   Kaz Kylheku to user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid    |
   Re: homework assignment for the group: m    |
   20 Nov 25 02:29:53    |
   1k    |
   261093    |
   dart200 to Mike Terry    |
   homework assignment for the group: multi    |
   19 Nov 25 18:08:23    |
   5k    |
   261092    |
   Mike Terry to Jeff Barnett    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   20 Nov 25 00:04:27    |
   5k    |
   261091    |
   olcott to Jeff Barnett    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   19 Nov 25 17:43:09    |
   5k    |
   261090    |
   Jeff Barnett to All    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   19 Nov 25 16:04:33    |
   4,913b    |
   261089    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   19 Nov 25 13:03:11    |
   3k    |
   261088    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i    |
   19 Nov 25 15:05:56    |
   2k    |
   261087    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li    |
   19 Nov 25 20:55:50    |
   7k    |
   261086    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to Mike Terry    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   19 Nov 25 12:51:02    |
   4k    |
   261085    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: polcott agrees the halting problem i    |
   19 Nov 25 20:55:43    |
   3,816b    |
   261084    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox -    |
   19 Nov 25 14:49:50    |
   3k    |
   261083    |
   J. J. Lodder to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic"    |
   19 Nov 25 21:48:01    |
   3,116b    |
   261082    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li    |
   19 Nov 25 14:22:37    |
   4k    |
   261081    |
   Mike Terry to All    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   19 Nov 25 19:42:10    |
   3k    |
   261080    |
   Kaz Kylheku to user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid    |
   Re: help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox    |
   19 Nov 25 19:47:50    |
   3k    |
   261079    |
   dart200 to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox    |
   19 Nov 25 11:19:13    |
   3k    |
   261078    |
   Mild Shock to The Starmaker    |
   Finalysons Black Hole spotted (Re: "The     |
   19 Nov 25 20:02:32    |
   2,598b    |
   261077    |
   Mild Shock to Ross Finlayson    |
   Read more books, Rossy Boy (Was: What we    |
   19 Nov 25 19:53:24    |
   1k    |
   261076    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li    |
   19 Nov 25 18:51:48    |
   3k    |
   261075    |
   Kaz Kylheku to user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid    |
   Re: help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox    |
   19 Nov 25 18:48:44    |
   2k    |
   261074    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (11/    |
   19 Nov 25 10:10:06    |
   5k    |
   261073    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (10/    |
   19 Nov 25 10:10:06    |
   7k    |
   261072    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (9/1    |
   19 Nov 25 10:10:06    |
   7k    |
   261071    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (8/1    |
   19 Nov 25 10:10:06    |
   7k    |
   261070    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (7/1    |
   19 Nov 25 10:10:06    |
   7k    |
   261069    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (6/1    |
   19 Nov 25 10:10:06    |
   7k    |
   261068    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (5/1    |
   19 Nov 25 10:10:06    |
   7k    |
   261067    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/1    |
   19 Nov 25 10:10:06    |
   7k    |
   261066    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/1    |
   19 Nov 25 10:10:06    |
   7k    |
   261065    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/1    |
   19 Nov 25 10:10:06    |
   7k    |
   261064    |
   The Starmaker to ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (1/1    |
   19 Nov 25 10:10:06    |
   7k    |
   261063    |
   dart200 to Tristan Wibberley    |
   help i'm stuck in a liar's paradox    |
   19 Nov 25 10:43:08    |
   2k    |
   261062    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   19 Nov 25 12:39:51    |
   2k    |
   261061    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   polcott agrees the halting problem is in    |
   19 Nov 25 12:37:35    |
   3k    |
   261060    |
   Kaz Kylheku to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   19 Nov 25 18:31:08    |
   2k    |
   261059    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   19 Nov 25 18:23:19    |
   2k    |
   261058    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   19 Nov 25 17:57:49    |
   2k    |
   261057    |
   dart200 to Mike Terry    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   19 Nov 25 10:26:18    |
   2k    |
   261056    |
   Kaz Kylheku to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   19 Nov 25 17:48:26    |
   1k    |
   261055    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   19 Nov 25 17:40:17    |
   1k    |
   261054    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   19 Nov 25 17:41:56    |
   3k    |
   261053    |
   Tristan Wibberley to All    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   19 Nov 25 17:17:42    |
   1k    |
   261052    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   19 Nov 25 11:04:36    |
   2k    |
   261051    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   19 Nov 25 11:10:30    |
   2k    |
   261050    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   19 Nov 25 16:35:44    |
   1k    |
   261049    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   19 Nov 25 16:28:25    |
   2k    |
   261048    |
   J. J. Lodder to mlwozniak@wp.pl    |
   Re: Teach Logic: Do Non-Wellfounded Proo    |
   19 Nov 25 14:18:15    |
   2k    |
   261047    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   19 Nov 25 15:51:08    |
   1k    |
   261046    |
   Mild Shock to Ross Finlayson    |
   What were your top-ten logic books? (Was    |
   19 Nov 25 09:59:24    |
   1,097b    |
   261045    |
   J. J. Lodder to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic"    |
   19 Nov 25 14:18:15    |
   1,097b    |
   261044    |
   Mild Shock to Ross Finlayson    |
   What are top ten books in set theory? (R    |
   19 Nov 25 10:15:50    |
   1k    |
   261043    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   Slim Fermats Last Theorem (FLT) only for    |
   19 Nov 25 11:16:48    |
   2k    |
   261042    |
   J. J. Lodder to Mild Shock    |
   Re: Teach Logic: Do Non-Wellfounded Proo    |
   19 Nov 25 11:12:57    |
   2k    |
   261041    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   17 Nov 25 04:01:49    |
   2k    |
   261040    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly rea    |
   19 Nov 25 04:30:52    |
   2k    |
   261039    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of    |
   17 Nov 25 04:04:06    |
   1k    |
   261038    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li    |
   18 Nov 25 21:04:44    |
   1k    |
   261037    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly rea    |
   18 Nov 25 21:07:35    |
   2k    |
   261036    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   18 Nov 25 19:46:53    |
   4k    |
   261035    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: The halting problem is merely the Li    |
   19 Nov 25 02:47:21    |
   3,601b    |
   261034    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: polcott agrees with the halting prob    |
   18 Nov 25 15:10:42    |
   2k    |
   261033    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (5/5    |
   18 Nov 25 12:47:53    |
   2k    |
   261032    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (4/5    |
   18 Nov 25 12:47:53    |
   7k    |
   261031    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (3/5    |
   18 Nov 25 12:47:53    |
   7k    |
   261030    |
   Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
   Re: "The Fundamental Joke of Logic" (2/5    |
   18 Nov 25 12:47:53    |
   7k    |
   261029    |
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
   Teach Logic: Do Non-Wellfounded Proofs (    |
   18 Nov 25 23:34:53    |
   2k    |
   261028    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Weasel word double talk excuses =--- AKA    |
   18 Nov 25 15:57:35    |
   4k    |
   261027    |
   Mild Shock to Ross Finlayson    |
   How teach logic? [The Jokes] (Was: "The     |
   18 Nov 25 22:43:32    |
   3,905b    |
   261026    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   18 Nov 25 14:01:44    |
   2k    |
   261025    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A    |
   18 Nov 25 09:15:58    |
   3k    |
   261024    |
   Mild Shock to Ross Finlayson    |
   How teach logic? [The Jokes] (Was: "The     |
   18 Nov 25 22:42:46    |
   3,390b    |
   261023    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: the halting problem is founded in co    |
   18 Nov 25 14:12:57    |
   5k    |
   261022    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly rea    |
   17 Nov 25 07:34:57    |
   1k    |
   261021    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   17 Nov 25 07:31:58    |
   1k    |
   261020    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   17 Nov 25 07:31:58    |
   6k    |
   261019    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   17 Nov 25 07:31:45    |
   1k    |
   261018    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: The halting problem is incorrect two    |
   17 Nov 25 07:31:45    |
   6k    |
   261017    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   People that have a very shallow understa    |
   17 Nov 25 07:12:46    |
   1k    |
   261016    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   17 Nov 25 05:03:42    |
   2k    |
   261015    |
   Alan Mackenzie to olcott    |
   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A    |
   17 Nov 25 13:21:59    |
   1,753b    |
   261014    |
   Alan Mackenzie to olcott    |
   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A    |
   17 Nov 25 13:21:59    |
   7k    |
   261013    |
   Mikko to olcott    |
   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A    |
   17 Nov 25 11:25:11    |
   1k    |
   261012    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   16 Nov 25 22:48:37    |
   1,281b    |
   261011    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   16 Nov 25 22:47:06    |
   1,281b    |
   261010    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   16 Nov 25 22:40:31    |
   1,281b    |
   261009    |
   Kaz Kylheku to olcott    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   17 Nov 25 04:29:48    |
   1k    |
   261008    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Who agrees that Kaz is dumber than the W    |
   16 Nov 25 22:26:21    |
   1k    |
   261007    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Kaz say that he is dumber than the Witch    |
   16 Nov 25 22:19:48    |
   1k    |
   261006    |
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku    |
   Kaz PROVES that he is dumber than the Wi    |
   16 Nov 25 22:25:16    |
   1k    |
   261005    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of    |
   16 Nov 25 21:50:54    |
   1k    |
   261004    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   16 Nov 25 21:49:02    |
   2k    |
   261003    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   16 Nov 25 21:47:58    |
   2k    |
   261002    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of    |
   17 Nov 25 03:41:31    |
   1k    |
   261001    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to olcott    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   16 Nov 25 18:35:22    |
   1k    |
   261000    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   17 Nov 25 02:21:30    |
   1k    |
   260999    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of    |
   16 Nov 25 20:13:40    |
   3k    |
   260998    |
   olcott to All    |
   KEY BASIS OF EVERYTHING THAT I HAVE SAID    |
   16 Nov 25 20:15:00    |
   2,708b    |
   260997    |
   olcott to Alan Mackenzie    |
   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A    |
   16 Nov 25 20:08:53    |
   5k    |
   260996    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of    |
   17 Nov 25 01:45:05    |
   2k    |
   260995    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of    |
   16 Nov 25 18:52:32    |
   2k    |
   260994    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: halting problem shows that "true on     |
   16 Nov 25 18:59:07    |
   1k    |
   260993    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   16 Nov 25 19:02:37    |
   1k    |
   260992    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   16 Nov 25 18:48:08    |
   2k    |
   260991    |
   Alan Mackenzie to olcott    |
   Re: "true on the basis of meaning" AKA A    |
   16 Nov 25 22:20:44    |
   5k    |
   260990    |
   olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   16 Nov 25 18:41:45    |
   1k    |
   260989    |
   Chris M. Thomasson to All    |
   Re: Kaz ---Keith said DDD simulated by H    |
   16 Nov 25 13:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260988    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (8/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 12:26:05    |
   3k    |
   260987    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (7/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 12:26:05    |
   7k    |
   260986    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 12:26:05    |
   7k    |
   260985    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 12:26:05    |
   7k    |
   260984    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (3/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 12:26:05    |
   7k    |
   260983    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 12:26:05    |
   7k    |
   260982    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/6)    |
   16 Nov 25 12:26:16    |
   4k    |
   260981    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (5/6)    |
   16 Nov 25 12:26:16    |
   7k    |
   260980    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/6)    |
   16 Nov 25 12:26:16    |
   7k    |
   260979    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (3/6)    |
   16 Nov 25 12:26:16    |
   7k    |
   260978    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/6)    |
   16 Nov 25 12:26:16    |
   7k    |
   260977    |
   olcott to Mikko    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   16 Nov 25 14:37:07    |
   3k    |
   260976    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
   16 Nov 25 19:56:05    |
   1k    |
   260975    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   Re: halting problem shows that "true on     |
   16 Nov 25 19:49:36    |
   1k    |
   260974    |
   Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rejecting_expressions_of    |
   16 Nov 25 19:11:49    |
   1k    |
   260973    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (15/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   5k    |
   260972    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (14/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260971    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (13/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260970    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (12/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260969    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (11/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260968    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (10/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260967    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (9/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260966    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (8/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260965    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (7/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260964    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260963    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (5/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260962    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260961    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/15)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:47:45    |
   7k    |
   260960    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (8/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:53:18    |
   3k    |
   260959    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (7/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:53:18    |
   7k    |
   260958    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:53:18    |
   7k    |
   260957    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:53:18    |
   7k    |
   260956    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (3/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:53:18    |
   7k    |
   260955    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/8)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:53:18    |
   7k    |
   260954    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (5/5)    |
   16 Nov 25 10:55:29    |
   2k    |
   260953    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/5)    |
   16 Nov 25 10:55:29    |
   7k    |
   260952    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (3/5)    |
   16 Nov 25 10:55:29    |
   7k    |
   260951    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/5)    |
   16 Nov 25 10:55:29    |
   7k    |
   260950    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/6)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:50:34    |
   4k    |
   260949    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (5/6)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:50:34    |
   7k    |
   260948    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/6)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:50:34    |
   7k    |
   260947    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (3/6)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:50:34    |
   7k    |
   260946    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/6)    |
   16 Nov 25 09:50:34    |
   7k    |
   260945    |
   Tristan Wibberley to Tristan Wibberley    |
   Re: Rejecting expressions of formal lang    |
   16 Nov 25 18:44:48    |
   1k    |
   260944    |
   olcott to joes    |
   Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly rea    |
   16 Nov 25 11:40:34    |
   1k    |
   260943    |
   olcott to joes    |
   DD simulated by HHH cannot possibly term    |
   16 Nov 25 11:20:14    |
   1k    |
   260942    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (28/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   2k    |
   260941    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (27/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260940    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (26/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260939    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (24/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260938    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (23/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260937    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (22/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260936    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (21/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260935    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (20/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260934    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (19/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260933    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (18/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260932    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (17/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260931    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (16/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260930    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (15/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260929    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (14/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260928    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (13/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260927    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (12/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260926    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (11/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260925    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (10/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260924    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (9/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260923    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (8/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260922    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (7/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260921    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (6/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260920    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (5/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260919    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (4/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260918    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (2/28)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:18:12    |
   7k    |
   260917    |
   HAL 9000 to olcott    |
   Re: Kaz ---Keith said DDD simulated by H    |
   16 Nov 25 16:46:24    |
   5k    |
   260916    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Kaz ---Keith said DDD simulated by H    |
   16 Nov 25 11:07:06    |
   6k    |
   260915    |
   olcott to joes    |
   Halt Deciders cannot report on the behav    |
   16 Nov 25 10:12:52    |
   1k    |
   260914    |
   olcott to All    |
   Re: Kaz ---Keith said DDD simulated by H    |
   16 Nov 25 09:29:48    |
   5k    |
   260913    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (10/10)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:20:43    |
   4k    |
   260912    |
   Ross Finlayson to All    |
   Re: T-theory A-theory theatheory (9/10)    |
   15 Nov 25 21:20:43    |
   7k    |
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca