Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 260,915 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to joes    |
|    Halt Deciders cannot report on the behav    |
|    16 Nov 25 10:12:52    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 11/16/2025 8:39 AM, joes wrote:       > Am Sat, 15 Nov 2025 20:55:29 -0600 schrieb olcott:       >       >> The information that HHH is required to report on simply is not       >> contained in its input.       >       > The information that HHH1 is required to report on is.       >              Yes that is correct. So when HHH(DD) and HHH1(DD)       are required to report on the behavior that their       input specifies HHH(DD)==0 and HHH1(DD)==1 are both correct.              The halting problem is incorrect when it requires a       halt decider to report on the behavior of its caller       because the decider has no way to even determine which       one of its possible callers is its actual caller.              It has always been out of the scope of every decider       to report on anything besides what its actual input       actually specifies.              HHH(DD) has been fully operational code for three years       https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c              --       Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius       hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca