XPost: comp.theory   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/16/2025 12:44 PM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:   
   > On 16/11/2025 00:10, Tristan Wibberley wrote:   
   >   
   >> Since Olcott has a problem with the lack of formal semantics for C he   
   >> should probably go for Scheme (avoiding define-syntax and let-syntex,   
   >> etc)   
   >   
   > Actually no, to make full use of its quoting, you'd need define-syntax.   
   > But then it's very complex, too.   
   >   
   > What goal are we really talking about trying to achieve anyway?   
   >   
      
   See my new signature line.   
      
   > --   
   > Tristan Wibberley   
   >   
   > The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except   
   > citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,   
   > of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it   
   > verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to   
   > promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation   
   > of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general   
   > superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train   
   > any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that   
   > will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.   
   >   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make   
   "true on the basis of meaning" computable.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)