XPost: comp.theory   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/15/2025 8:48 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   > On 2025-11-16, olcott  wrote:   
   >> HHH cannot possibly report on the behavior   
   >> of its caller because HHH has no way of   
   >> knowing what function is calling it.   
   >>   
   >> This means that when the halting problem   
   >> requires HHH to report on the behavior of   
   >> its caller: DD() that its is requiring   
   >> something outside the scope of computation.   
   >   
   > That's dumber than the Witch scene in Monty Python and The Holy Grail.   
   >   
      
      
   Yes and now if you could just translate that   
   mere baseless rhetoric into actual reasoning   
   with a sound basis.   
      
   Not to denigrate you but I think that this   
   would be totally out of your depth as it   
   would be for most everyone.   
      
   The information that HHH is required to report   
   on simply is not contained in its input.   
      
   The information that HHH is required to report   
   on simply is not contained in its input.   
      
   The information that HHH is required to report   
   on simply is not contained in its input.   
      
   The information that HHH is required to report   
   on simply is not contained in its input.   
      
   The information that HHH is required to report   
   on simply is not contained in its input.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make   
   "true on the basis of meaning" computable.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)