Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 261,049 of 262,912    |
|    Tristan Wibberley to Kaz Kylheku    |
|    Re: People that have a very shallow unde    |
|    19 Nov 25 16:28:25    |
      XPost: comp.theory       From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk              On 17/11/2025 23:49, Kaz Kylheku wrote:              > [Mocking Olcott:] the foundational assumptions of computation       > are things like EAX and EIP registers of the 32 bit x86 processor.              It's an interesting philosophy. What is computation founded on but       formal reduction machines and—I /add/ also—systems of reasoning that may       be applied to them. In the latter lies philosophy under eternal doubt.                     > You've noted in the past that x86 is over the heads of almost       > everyone in CS academia.              It is. It's hard. It's so big.                     > That's also why they are wrong about halting.              Which specific property about halting or of the reasoning about halting,       though.                     > They just can't follow simple machine language        ^^^^^^       definitely the wrong word, but the clause is true otherwise.                     > which knocks       > it all down.              Does he really say that? and what does "knocks it all down" mean anyway?              (a) disproves the halting theorem       (b) discredits popular wisdom of where to apply the theorem       (c) restricts interpretation of its expression to a philosophically       weaker meaning than is intuitively easy and apparent in literature and       public education       (d) other                     --       Tristan Wibberley              The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except       citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,       of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it       verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to       promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation       of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general       superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train       any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that       will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca