XPost: sci.math, comp.theory   
   From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   On 11/25/25 7:06 PM, olcott wrote:   
   > On 11/25/2025 9:02 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >> On 2025-11-26, olcott  wrote:   
   >>> On 11/25/2025 8:34 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>>> On 2025-11-26, olcott  wrote:   
   >>>>> *Here is a concrete example*   
   >>>>> The predicate Bachelor(x) is stipulated to mean ~Married(x)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's a stupid thing to stipulate; Bachelor(x) could refer to a   
   >>>> suite with zero bedrooms.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Is this how you plan to fix the accuracy issues in LLMs?   
   >>>   
   >>> You fail to understand that I just refuted the most famous   
   >>> paper on the analytic / synthetic distinction.   
   >>   
   >> Refuted the paper, like, as in, you were sitting on the crapper,   
   >> made your mark and put it behind you?   
   >>   
   >   
   > Maybe it is time that I *plonk* you too.   
   >   
      
   bruh, ur not going convince anyone by blocking everyone   
      
   --   
   a burnt out swe investigating into why our tooling doesn't involve   
   basic semantic proofs like halting analysis   
      
   please excuse my pseudo-pyscript,   
      
   ~ nick   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)