Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 261,246 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Python    |
|    Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
|    25 Nov 25 21:11:13    |
      XPost: sci.math, comp.theory       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 11/25/2025 9:03 PM, Python wrote:       > Le 26/11/2025 à 04:01, olcott a écrit :       >> You insist on making sure to continue to       >> fail to understand the deep meaning of the       >> occurs_check.       >       > Peter, the occurs_check does not carry any “deep meaning.”       > It is a mechanical guard in Prolog that prevents the construction of       > infinite data structures.       >       > That’s all.              Because the expression is semantically unsound       because the evaluation of the expression would       remain stuck in an infinite loop forever never       to be resolved to a truth value.              *SEMANTICALLY UNSOUND* is the deep meaning.                     --       Copyright 2025 Olcott              My 28 year goal has been to make       "true on the basis of meaning" computable.              This required establishing a new foundation       for correct reasoning.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca