XPost: sci.math, comp.theory   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/25/2025 9:09 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   > On 2025-11-26, olcott  wrote:   
   >> On 11/25/2025 8:36 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>> On 2025-11-26, olcott  wrote:   
   >>>> None of them ever had the slightest clue about Montague   
   >>>> Grammar. Except for one they all had very severe math   
   >>>> phobia.   
   >>>   
   >>> So do you; you are terribly afraid of the mathematical idea that   
   >>> simulations that are paused still exist and have future   
   >>> states.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> I am not going to discuss your psychotic nonsense.   
   >   
   > In all honesty, you and your therapist /should/ be laser focused on your   
   > own psychotic nonsense.   
   >   
   >> You already agreed that I am correct so this subject   
   >> is closed.   
   >   
   > Whaaat ...   
   >   
   >> news://news.eternal-september.org/20251104183329.967@kylheku.com   
   >> On 11/4/2025 8:43 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>> On 2025-11-05, olcott  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The whole point is that D simulated by H   
   >>>> cannot possbly reach its own simulated   
   >>>> "return" statement no matter what H does.   
   >>>   
   >>> Yes; this doesn't happen while H is running.   
   >>>   
   >>> So while H does /something/, no matter what H does,   
   >>> that D simulation won't reach the return statement.   
   >   
   > But we know that. If H is nonreturning, of course D is.   
   > Since D calls H(D), D is suspended until H(D) returns,   
   > which means forever if H(D) is nonterminating.   
   >   
   > I have no idea what you are trying to milk out of this;   
   > it is completely uncontroversial.   
   >   
      
   I really did figure out how to determine the   
   correct halt status that the halting problem's   
   counter-example input specifies to it decider.   
      
   If no one here wants to acknowledge that besides   
   Ben then you can all go to literal Hell as the   
   bible says is the fate of all liars.   
      
   I can show how this does prove that the halting   
   problem itself is incorrect yet no one here gives   
   a rat's ass.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make   
   "true on the basis of meaning" computable.   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation   
   for correct reasoning.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)