Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 261,265 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Python    |
|    Re: New formal foundation for correct re    |
|    25 Nov 25 21:45:35    |
      XPost: sci.math, comp.theory       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 11/25/2025 9:26 PM, Python wrote:       > Le 26/11/2025 à 04:24, olcott a écrit :       >> When ALL *objects of thought* are defined       >> in terms of other *objects of thought* then       >> their truth and their proof is simply walking       >> the knowledge tree.       >       > A definition tree is not a proof system, Peter.              When you have a narrow-minded view maybe not.       When a proof is any process applied to any       combination of finite strings (such as a tree       of knowledge) that makes its conclusion necessarily       true then it is a proof in the most generic sense.              When we stipulate that "cats" |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca