Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 261,655 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Andy Walker    |
|    The quality of reviewers on USENET    |
|    03 Dec 25 18:11:07    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 12/2/2025 8:56 AM, Andy Walker wrote:       > On 01/12/2025 21:48, Richard Heathfield wrote:       >> On 01/12/2025 19:45, Alan Mackenzie wrote:       >>> [...] It's strenuous and sole destroying at the       >>> best of times; [...].       >       > Ouch! That's bad for the feet.       >       >> I've been (mostly) in for a while, and I've lost nothing.       >       > Likewise; and the same applies to several respected posters       > who have contributed only occasionally or not at all now for several       > years.       >       >> But nature abhors a vacuum. If we can't do anything about the       >> eternal noise, the best way to improve the S/N ratio is to boost the       >> signal. If we just stop posting, by default the group becomes a       >> nutjob advocacy group.       >       > There's no need for people to stop. The noise is largely because       > people cannot refrain from replying /instantly/ to everything written.       > When an article is several hundred lines /and/ is posted a few minutes       > after the post to which it is replying then you /know/ that it contains              Despicable lies by despicable lying bass turds.              > nothing of value, but is merely a "'tis, 'tisn't, 'tis, 'tisn't" tit-tor-       > tat [and mostly tat]. Take at least half an hour to write an article, and       > the quality of what you write will improve -- and so will the chance that       > others will read it. [This applies to PO as much as to others.] Limit       > your posts to 100 lines [50 would be better, and 25 better still] and       > again both the quality and the reach will improve. We might even get some       > interesting new material. In any case, five good articles/day in this       > group would be a big improvement on 100+ of rubbish.       >                     --       Copyright 2025 Olcott              My 28 year goal has been to make       "true on the basis of meaning" computable.              This required establishing a new foundation       for correct reasoning.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca