home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.logic      Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa      262,912 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 261,698 of 262,912   
   olcott to Ross Finlayson   
   Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni   
   05 Dec 25 17:45:14   
   
   XPost: sci.math, comp.theory   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/5/2025 5:16 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   > On 12/05/2025 02:45 PM, Python wrote:   
   >> Le 05/12/2025 à 23:24, olcott a écrit :   
   >>> On 12/5/2025 4:17 PM, Python wrote:   
   >>>> Le 05/12/2025 à 18:00, olcott a écrit :   
   >>>> ..   
   >>>>> int main()   
   >>>>> {   
   >>>>>    bool Sentence = !(Sentence); // Liar Paradox in C++   
   >>>>>    return 0;   
   >>>>> }   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You are diving into complete insanity, Olcott.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Maybe God will forgive your sins because you are insane. Who knows?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> In other words you don't give a rat's ass for   
   >>> truth at this crucial time when the lack of it   
   >>> can have horrific consequences.   
   >>>   
   >>> All that you have for rebuttal is ad homimen   
   >>> person attacks. If that is accurately construed   
   >>> as deceptions Revelations 21:8 may be bad for   
   >>> you (unless you repent).   
   >>>   
   >>> I care about truth because righteousness is   
   >>> anchored in truth.   
   >>>   
   >>> As far as righteousness goes I came up with   
   >>> *Love one another with as much empathy as possible*   
   >>> when a 2015 policy change at my church directly   
   >>> caused the suicide of more than 30 young people.   
   >>   
   >> There is no righteousness on your side, only hypocrisy and bigotry in   
   >> disguise.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > It's invincible ignorance of the (sadly) usual enough   
   > the inductive impasse, yet a wider, fuller dialectic   
   > may make for analytical bridges first to establish   
   > continuity then infinity and all quite naturally.   
   >   
   > For paradox-free infinitary deductive reasoning, ....   
   >   
      
   I think that would be inherently finite.   
   I have been envisioning a tree of knowledge,   
   more precisely a directed acyclic graph, thus   
   allowing multiple inheritance of semantic properties.   
      
   > Or, a retro-finitist howler crank troll, ...,   
   > yet, one may aver they'd rather live in a world   
   > of reasoned rationality a natural reality.   
   >   
   >   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make   
   "true on the basis of meaning" computable.   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation   
   for correct reasoning.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca