Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 261,818 of 262,912    |
|    Mikko to All    |
|    Re: This single paragraph proves that th    |
|    11 Dec 25 11:00:01    |
      XPost: comp.theory, comp.ai.philosophy       From: mikko.levanto@iki.fi              olcott kirjoitti 10.12.2025 klo 15.04:       > On 12/10/2025 3:43 AM, Mikko wrote:       >> polcott kirjoitti 10.12.2025 klo 0.27:       >>> These are finally the long sought words that do       >>> resolve the halting problem to a category error.       >>       >>> Turing machine deciders only compute the mapping from       >>> their [finite string] inputs to an accept or reject       >>> state on the basis that this [finite string] input       >>> specifies or fails to specify a particular semantic       >>> or syntactic property.       >>       >> The above paragraph (acutally just one sentence) does not prove or       >> even say anything about the halting problem.       >       > It is the definition of a decider that the halting       > problem violates.              Nothing in the problem statement violates any definition. You can't       even quote the alleged "violation".              --       Mikko              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca