Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 261,857 of 262,912    |
|    Mikko to As I already    |
|    Re: A new foundation for correct reasoni    |
|    13 Dec 25 12:19:37    |
      [continued from previous message]              expression. A goal is evaluated to a truth value but if that truth       value is true the values of variables (if there are any) are also       evalueted to values that are not truth values. In the example        ?- G = not(provable(F, G)).       the answer        G = not(provable(F, G)).       mans that the Prolog implementation evaluated the query to true and       the variable G to the expression not(provable(F, G)). The quoted       text says that another Prolog implementation may interprethe the       same query differently.              The quoted text does not stay unify_with_occurs_check/2 would reject       anything as "semntically unsound". First of all, it nas no consequences       unless it is used. Secondly, if the result of unification would be       that at a cycle be created then it simpy evaluates to false just       like unify_with_occurs_check(1, 2) evaluates to false.              --       Mikko              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca