Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 261,965 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
|    The most definitive measure of the behav    |
|    16 Dec 25 11:21:18    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math, comp.ai.philosophy       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 12/16/2025 2:39 AM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:       > On 15/12/2025 23:23, polcott wrote:       >> They are not going to know the nuances of context       >> dependent execution. Everyone here denies that it       >> exists when I have proven it beyond all possible       >> doubt thousands of times.       >       > It's literally in Turing's paper. He calls them c-machines (choice       > machines). One of the state-transitions takes context from outside the       > machine.       >              It is a verified fact that HHH(DD)==0 and HHH1(DD)==1       are both correct when              (a) TMs only transform input finite strings to values              (b) There exists no alternative more definitive measure       of the behavior that the input to H(P) specifies (within       finite string transformation rules) than P simulated by H.              --       Copyright 2025 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca