home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.logic      Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa      262,912 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 262,010 of 262,912   
   polcott to All   
   Re: on what are you even crying about ri   
   18 Dec 25 18:45:00   
   
   XPost: comp.theory, sci.math   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/18/2025 6:39 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   > On 12/18/25 4:35 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:   
   >> On 12/17/2025 11:13 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>> On 12/17/25 10:17 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:   
   >>>> On 12/17/2025 10:14 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>> On 12/17/25 10:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 12/17/2025 9:06 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>>> While no halt deciders exist, the "inteface that they define" does.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> For a given program, the creator can create a halting decider for   
   >>>>>> its logic. Does this path halt or not, well, we know, we made the   
   >>>>>> damn thing. But, there is no one universal decider...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> how do we know that if there is no algo to compute that???   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you create a program you know what paths its going down. If you   
   >>>> call into other programs, well, shit happens. But your own logic,   
   >>>> you know what you are doing when you made the program.   
   >>>   
   >>> w/e, i think "your own logic" is following an algo we just haven't   
   >>> written down because "muh undecidability"   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> There can be a specialized halting decider for a program, but not one   
   >> decider for any program.   
   >   
   > thank you for repeating the consensus that has been repeated at me 100s   
   > of times now   
   >   
      
   It is best to think of most of them as not very smart bots.   
   On the other hand Claude AI is so fabulous at semantic   
   entailment from a correct basis that I got it to override   
   its own bias and admit its own mistake this way. It was   
   actually capable of introspection.   
      
   > also there are semantic paradoxes that no program could decide upon   
   >   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make   
   "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"   
   reliably computable.   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation   
   for correct reasoning.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca