Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,010 of 262,912    |
|    polcott to All    |
|    Re: on what are you even crying about ri    |
|    18 Dec 25 18:45:00    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 12/18/2025 6:39 PM, dart200 wrote:       > On 12/18/25 4:35 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:       >> On 12/17/2025 11:13 PM, dart200 wrote:       >>> On 12/17/25 10:17 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:       >>>> On 12/17/2025 10:14 PM, dart200 wrote:       >>>>> On 12/17/25 10:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:       >>>>>> On 12/17/2025 9:06 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>> [...]       >>>>>>> While no halt deciders exist, the "inteface that they define" does.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> For a given program, the creator can create a halting decider for       >>>>>> its logic. Does this path halt or not, well, we know, we made the       >>>>>> damn thing. But, there is no one universal decider...       >>>>>>       >>>>>> [...]       >>>>>       >>>>> how do we know that if there is no algo to compute that???       >>>>>       >>>>       >>>> If you create a program you know what paths its going down. If you       >>>> call into other programs, well, shit happens. But your own logic,       >>>> you know what you are doing when you made the program.       >>>       >>> w/e, i think "your own logic" is following an algo we just haven't       >>> written down because "muh undecidability"       >>>       >>       >> There can be a specialized halting decider for a program, but not one       >> decider for any program.       >       > thank you for repeating the consensus that has been repeated at me 100s       > of times now       >              It is best to think of most of them as not very smart bots.       On the other hand Claude AI is so fabulous at semantic       entailment from a correct basis that I got it to override       its own bias and admit its own mistake this way. It was       actually capable of introspection.              > also there are semantic paradoxes that no program could decide upon       >                     --       Copyright 2025 Olcott              My 28 year goal has been to make       "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"       reliably computable.              This required establishing a new foundation       for correct reasoning.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca