home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.logic      Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa      262,912 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 262,011 of 262,912   
   dart200 to polcott   
   Re: on what are you even crying about ri   
   18 Dec 25 16:54:34   
   
   XPost: comp.theory, sci.math   
   From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   On 12/18/25 4:45 PM, polcott wrote:   
   > On 12/18/2025 6:39 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >> On 12/18/25 4:35 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:   
   >>> On 12/17/2025 11:13 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>> On 12/17/25 10:17 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:   
   >>>>> On 12/17/2025 10:14 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 12/17/25 10:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 12/17/2025 9:06 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>>>> While no halt deciders exist, the "inteface that they define" does.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> For a given program, the creator can create a halting decider for   
   >>>>>>> its logic. Does this path halt or not, well, we know, we made the   
   >>>>>>> damn thing. But, there is no one universal decider...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> how do we know that if there is no algo to compute that???   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> If you create a program you know what paths its going down. If you   
   >>>>> call into other programs, well, shit happens. But your own logic,   
   >>>>> you know what you are doing when you made the program.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> w/e, i think "your own logic" is following an algo we just haven't   
   >>>> written down because "muh undecidability"   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> There can be a specialized halting decider for a program, but not one   
   >>> decider for any program.   
   >>   
   >> thank you for repeating the consensus that has been repeated at me   
   >> 100s of times now   
   >>   
   >   
   > It is best to think of most of them as not very smart bots.   
   > On the other hand Claude AI is so fabulous at semantic   
   > entailment from a correct basis that I got it to override   
   > its own bias and admit its own mistake this way. It was   
   > actually capable of introspection.   
      
   bro convincing an AI to say what u want is kinda trivial, other people   
   are not, and i've learned a lot more in responding to real people vs AI   
      
   and i don't feel like having that debate, so we can just agree to   
   disagree on that point   
      
   >   
   >> also there are semantic paradoxes that no program could decide upon   
   >>   
   >   
      
   --   
   hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca