home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.logic      Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa      262,912 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 262,097 of 262,912   
   olcott to Richard Damon   
   Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c   
   22 Dec 25 12:09:13   
   
   XPost: comp.theory, comp.lang.prolog, sci.math   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/22/2025 12:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   > On 12/22/25 12:59 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >> On 12/22/2025 11:41 AM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>> On 12/22/25 12:30 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>> On 12/22/2025 11:23 AM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>> On 12/22/25 12:19 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 12/22/2025 11:11 AM, Mikko wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 22/12/2025 18:39, olcott wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> % This sentence is not true.   
   >>>>>>>>   ?- LP = not(true(LP)).   
   >>>>>>>> LP = not(true(LP)).   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The Prolog implementation's opinion is that it is true.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> % This sentence is not true.   
   >>>>>>   ?- LP = not(true(LP)).   
   >>>>>> LP = not(true(LP)).   
   >>>>>> ?- unify_with_occurs_check(LP, not(true(LP))).   
   >>>>>> false.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> By erasing the last line you seem to be dishonest   
   >>>>>> was that your intention?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Also you do not seem to understand exactly   
   >>>>>> what unify_with_occurs_check() means even   
   >>>>>> when I quoted Clocksin & Mellish on this.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It means that the input sentence didn't obey Prologs non-recursvie   
   >>>>> nature.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No that is not what it means.   
   >>>> It means that the evaluation of LP is stuck   
   >>>> in infinite recursion. LLMs are smart enough   
   >>>> to immediately see this.   
   >>>   
   >>> BECAUSE Prolog, and the simplistic logic it uses, can't handle that   
   >>> statement.   
   >>   
   >> Counter-factual.   
   >>   
   >> Prolog (and Olcott's Minimal Type Theory) detects   
   >> cycles in the directed graph of the evaluation   
   >> sequence of an expression.   
   >   
   > But Cycles are not inherently a problem.   
   >   
      
   The same thing as stuck in an infinite loop.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott

              My 28 year goal has been to make
       "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
       reliably computable.

              This required establishing a new foundation
              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca