Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,097 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: Carol's question + my Prolog are a c    |
|    22 Dec 25 12:09:13    |
      XPost: comp.theory, comp.lang.prolog, sci.math       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 12/22/2025 12:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       > On 12/22/25 12:59 PM, olcott wrote:       >> On 12/22/2025 11:41 AM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>> On 12/22/25 12:30 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>> On 12/22/2025 11:23 AM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>> On 12/22/25 12:19 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>> On 12/22/2025 11:11 AM, Mikko wrote:       >>>>>>> On 22/12/2025 18:39, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> % This sentence is not true.       >>>>>>>> ?- LP = not(true(LP)).       >>>>>>>> LP = not(true(LP)).       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> The Prolog implementation's opinion is that it is true.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>> % This sentence is not true.       >>>>>> ?- LP = not(true(LP)).       >>>>>> LP = not(true(LP)).       >>>>>> ?- unify_with_occurs_check(LP, not(true(LP))).       >>>>>> false.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> By erasing the last line you seem to be dishonest       >>>>>> was that your intention?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Also you do not seem to understand exactly       >>>>>> what unify_with_occurs_check() means even       >>>>>> when I quoted Clocksin & Mellish on this.       >>>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> It means that the input sentence didn't obey Prologs non-recursvie       >>>>> nature.       >>>>>       >>>>       >>>> No that is not what it means.       >>>> It means that the evaluation of LP is stuck       >>>> in infinite recursion. LLMs are smart enough       >>>> to immediately see this.       >>>       >>> BECAUSE Prolog, and the simplistic logic it uses, can't handle that       >>> statement.       >>       >> Counter-factual.       >>       >> Prolog (and Olcott's Minimal Type Theory) detects       >> cycles in the directed graph of the evaluation       >> sequence of an expression.       >       > But Cycles are not inherently a problem.       >              The same thing as stuck in an infinite loop.              --       Copyright 2025 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca