Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,111 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: I proved the HP input is the same as    |
|    22 Dec 25 21:20:01    |
   
   XPost: comp.theory, sci.math   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/22/2025 9:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   > On 12/22/25 10:11 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >> On 12/22/2025 8:47 PM, Python wrote:   
   >>> Le 23/12/2025 à 01:01, olcott a écrit :   
   >>>> On 6/23/2004 9:34 PM, Peter Olcott wrote:   
   >>>>>>> PREMISES:   
   >>>>>>> (1) The Halting Problem was specified in such a way that a solution   
   >>>>>>> was defined to be impossible.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No, it wasn't. It's a perfectly legitimate mathematical problem. It's   
   >>>>>> not even obvious that it wouldn't have an effective solution at first   
   >>>>>> sight.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> function LoopIfYouSayItHalts (bool YouSayItHalts):   
   >>>>> if YouSayItHalts () then   
   >>>>> while true do {}   
   >>>>> else   
   >>>>> return false;   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Does this program Halt?   
   >>>   
   >>> This is utterly asinine! The name of a function or of an argument   
   >>> does not carry any semantic value.   
   >>>   
   >>> func is_even(int n):   
   >>> if n % 2 == 0 then   
   >>> return false   
   >>> else   
   >>> return true   
   >>>   
   >>> The function shouldn't be named is_even, anyway there is nothing   
   >>> wrong with this function /per se/.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> You erased a key aspect of the context.   
   >> This is my first work on the halting problem   
   >> 21 years ago.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > Which shows that you never knew what you doing.   
      
   You can spout that off as baseless dogmatic   
   rhetoric yet cannot show that the essence of   
   what I am saying is less than infallibly correct.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca