XPost: comp.theory, sci.math, comp.ai.philosophy   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/26/2025 9:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   > On 12/26/25 10:19 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >> Whenever it can be verified that correct semantic   
   >> entailment is applied to the semantic meaning of   
   >> expressions of language then what-so-ever conclusion   
   >> is derived is a necessary consequence of this   
   >> expression of language.   
   >>   
   >   
   > You just don't know what that means, because to you, words don't actualy   
   > need to mean what you use them as.   
   >   
      
   *You just don't know what that means* or you could show my mistake.   
      
   > All you are doing is using gobbledygook words to try to hide your lies.   
   >   
   > You don't even know what a program is, or how its input is defined.   
      
   The gist of   
   *correct semantic entailment*   
   is shown by the syllogism that directly encodes   
   its semantics as categorical propositions.   
      
   No separate model theory nonsense where true   
   and provable can diverge.   
      
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllogism#Basic_structure   
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_proposition   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott

   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make 
   
   "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
   
   reliably computable.

   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation
   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)