XPost: comp.theory, sci.math, comp.ai.philosophy   
   From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk   
      
   On 27/12/2025 03:19, olcott wrote:   
   > Whenever it can be verified that correct semantic   
   > entailment is applied to the semantic meaning of   
   > expressions of language then what-so-ever conclusion   
   > is derived is a necessary consequence of this   
   > expression of language.   
      
   "the" applied to a continuum. How do you trust a system that does such a   
   verification? It's related to LLMs so closely itself.   
      
   --   
   Tristan Wibberley   
      
   The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except   
   citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,   
   of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it   
   verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to   
   promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation   
   of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general   
   superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train   
   any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that   
   will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)