XPost: comp.theory, sci.math, comp.ai.philosophy   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/30/2025 2:22 PM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:   
   > On 30/12/2025 14:32, olcott wrote:   
   >   
   >> G := (F ⊬ G)   
   >> a sequence of inference steps in F from the axioms   
   >> of F that assert that they themselves do not exist in F.   
   >   
   > You suppose that's what the symbols mean. Yet you know that supposition   
   > is inadmissible per-Se. Cognitive dissonance in action.   
   >   
      
   The symbols *mean* a self-contradictory expression of language   
   the same sort of thing as: "this sentence is not true".   
      
   > You rely on the delusion that the internal sensation of defining a   
   > symbol actually has that effect on your mindspace and also on the   
   > continued hallucination that the symbol is then stably so defined when   
   > you later introspect your mind-space.   
   >   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott

   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make 
   
   "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
   
   reliably computable.

   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation
   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)