XPost: comp.theory   
   From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk   
      
   On 01/01/2026 22:43, Richard Damon wrote:   
   > On 1/1/26 5:12 PM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:   
   >> On 31/12/2025 23:27, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> So, how do you think you can prove it in F?   
   >>   
   >> What does "F" refer to?   
   >>   
   >   
   > The base system. Depending on which discussion of Godel's paper you are   
   > reading it is described with different names.   
      
   His own 1931 paper calls it P. What's the probleme with that name?   
   Unless the discussion you're reading goes to the lengths that Gödel went   
   to then it's inevitably wrong, and if it /does/ go to those lengths then   
   why wouldn't it require you to read Gödel's paper as part of it?   
      
   --   
   Tristan Wibberley   
      
   The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except   
   citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,   
   of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it   
   verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to   
   promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation   
   of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general   
   superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train   
   any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that   
   will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)