home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.logic      Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa      262,912 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 262,309 of 262,912   
   Tristan Wibberley to All   
   Re: have we been misusing incompleteness   
   02 Jan 26 05:54:21   
   
   XPost: comp.theory, sci.math   
   From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk   
      
   On 02/01/2026 02:45, AndrĂ© G. Isaak wrote:   
   > On 2026-01-01 16:48, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >> On 1/1/26 6:13 PM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:   
   >>> On 01/01/2026 22:40, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> But it IS a theorem of the base system, as it uses ONLY the   
   >>>> mathematical   
   >>>> operations definable in the base system. What makes you think it   
   >>>> isn't a   
   >>>> Theorem in the base system.   
   >>>   
   >>> It has no derivation in the base system, if it had you wouldn't think   
   >>> the base system were incomplete.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> It has no PROOF in the base system.   
   >   
   > Which means it is not a theorem of the base system. A theorem is a   
   > statement which can be proven in a particular system.   
      
   We have to avoid "proven in a particular system" and choose "Derived in   
   a particular system" or "Derived of a particular system" or, since it's   
   well defined, "Theorem of a particular system".   
      
   The problem with "prove" is there are numerous episystems (HA being   
   popular) that provide for "proofs" of statements of systems they're   
   applied to. Technically, episystems may or may not prove the same set of   
   statements that are theorem's of the system they're applied to.   
      
      
   --   
   Tristan Wibberley   
      
   The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except   
   citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,   
   of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it   
   verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to   
   promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation   
   of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general   
   superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train   
   any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that   
   will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca