XPost: comp.theory, sci.math   
   From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk   
      
   On 03/01/2026 22:18, olcott wrote:   
      
   > ...14 Every epistemological antinomy can likewise be   
   > used for a similar undecidability proof...(Gödel 1931:40-41)   
   >   
   > Thus the resolution of the Liar Paradox resolves   
   > Gödel incompleteness.   
      
      
   Misuse of "thus": ought to be "therefore". Then you still have the   
   second statement of your syllogism missing. Perhaps you can construct it   
   using a syllogism that derives the equivalence of all epistemological   
   antinomies with the liar paradox.   
      
      
   --   
   Tristan Wibberley   
      
   The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except   
   citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,   
   of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it   
   verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to   
   promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation   
   of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general   
   superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train   
   any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that   
   will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)