Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,382 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
|    Re: have we been misusing incompleteness    |
|    04 Jan 26 23:26:56    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 1/4/2026 10:42 PM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:       > On 03/01/2026 22:18, olcott wrote:       >       >> ...14 Every epistemological antinomy can likewise be       >> used for a similar undecidability proof...(Gödel 1931:40-41)       >>       >> Thus the resolution of the Liar Paradox resolves       >> Gödel incompleteness.       >       >       > Misuse of "thus": ought to be "therefore".              X fucking does Y, close enough.              > Then you still have the       > second statement of your syllogism missing. Perhaps you can construct it       > using a syllogism that derives the equivalence of all epistemological       > antinomies with the liar paradox.       >              I breath therefore I live, only two pieces required.                     --       Copyright 2026 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca