From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk   
      
   On 05/01/2026 14:20, Mikko wrote:   
   > A significantly simpler proof would be interesting but only if it is   
   > a complete proof.   
      
   His isn't a complete proof as far as I can see. The theorem is about   
   each system of a certain class and it doesn't look like his proof covers   
   that fully. Not that I disagree with you but the bar disqualifies Gödel too.   
      
   --   
   Tristan Wibberley   
      
   The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except   
   citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,   
   of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it   
   verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to   
   promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation   
   of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general   
   superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train   
   any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that   
   will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)