XPost: comp.theory   
   From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk   
      
   On 11/01/2026 11:31, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >> Not one person from any field or combination of   
   >> fields has presented any formal resolution of   
   >> the Liar Paradox that has been officially accepted.   
   >> Did you know that?   
   >   
   > WRONG.   
      
   What does "officially accepted" mean? His Majesty's crown court has   
   found that the resolution is so with prejudice? His Majesty's memoirs   
   "My Liar Paradox and I" has the resolution in it? His Majesty published   
   a decree in The London Gazette?   
      
   You have to pay 500% attention to the actual words Olcott actually uses.   
      
   --   
   Tristan Wibberley   
      
   The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except   
   citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,   
   of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it   
   verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to   
   promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation   
   of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general   
   superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train   
   any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that   
   will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)