XPost: comp.theory   
   From: news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net   
      
   On 1/11/26 9:39 AM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:   
   > On 11/01/2026 11:31, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>> Not one person from any field or combination of   
   >>> fields has presented any formal resolution of   
   >>> the Liar Paradox that has been officially accepted.   
   >>> Did you know that?   
   >>   
   >> WRONG.   
   >   
   > What does "officially accepted" mean? His Majesty's crown court has   
   > found that the resolution is so with prejudice? His Majesty's memoirs   
   > "My Liar Paradox and I" has the resolution in it? His Majesty published   
   > a decree in The London Gazette?   
   >   
   > You have to pay 500% attention to the actual words Olcott actually uses.   
   >   
      
   I guess you are part of the Logical Anarchy that just doesn't accept the   
   formalizm of Formal Logic, putting you in the same camp as Olcott.   
      
   Formal logic has long solved this problem, it is the know-nothing   
   anarchists that can't find a solution, as they have no real rules to   
   base things on, and thus CAN'T "officially" do anything, so his   
   statement is just a nonsense voidness.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)