Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,531 of 262,912    |
|    Tristan Wibberley to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: What formal logical systems resolve     |
|    15 Jan 26 14:31:09    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math       From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk              On 15/01/2026 02:57, Richard Damon wrote:       > A fundamental of Godel's proof is showing that a proof checker is a       > computatble operation. That is the essense of what all of Godel's       > numbering and the relation he derives.              A proof checker rejects the proof in Gödel's 1931 paper because you need       an ATP to fill in the proof of proposition V which he doesn't prove in       his 1931 paper.                     --       Tristan Wibberley              The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except       citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,       of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it       verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to       promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation       of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general       superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train       any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that       will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca