Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,550 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
|    Re: Schematic systems    |
|    15 Jan 26 20:06:50    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 1/15/2026 5:10 PM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:       > I understand a schematic system is one whose deduction rules or,       > perhaps, inference rules (if there's a difference) are specified as       > axioms of the same system.       >       > 1. Can that be a syntactical system or a formal system just as well and       > still be called a schematic system?       >              Unfolding schematic systems∗       Thomas Strahm∗∗       January 14, 2016       https://home.inf.unibe.ch/ltg/publications/2016/str16.pdf              > 2. Suppose it's a positive intuitionist system, what are the most       > notable things to consider vis-a-vis extensions?       >              --       Copyright 2026 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca