XPost: comp.theory, sci.math, sci.lang.semantics   
   XPost: comp.ai.nat-lang   
   From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk   
      
   On 21/01/2026 04:00, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >On 1/20/26 1:13 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >> All meta-math is defined to be outside the scope of PA.   
   >   
   > But we don't need "meta-math" to establish the answer.   
   >   
   > It is a FACT that no number will satisfy the Relationship, but this is   
   > not provable, and the not being provable is not provable.   
   >   
   > Thus it is NOT   
      
   I think Olcott is out-pacing you with what must be his answer macro   
   system that produces replies faster than human conversation.   
      
   As a result you've made no sense at all.   
      
   --   
   Tristan Wibberley   
      
   The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except   
   citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,   
   of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it   
   verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to   
   promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation   
   of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general   
   superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train   
   any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that   
   will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)