Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,655 of 262,912    |
|    Moebius to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
|    22 Jan 26 02:23:06    |
      XPost: sci.math       From: invalid@example.invalid              Am 19.01.2026 um 02:24 schrieb Python:       > Le 19/01/2026 à 00:41, olcott a écrit :       >>       >> I already just said that the proof [or] refutation of       >> Goldbach are outside the scope of PA axioms.              Huh?! How does this fool "know" that?              >> Any proof or refutation of Goldbach would have to use       >> principles stronger than the axioms of PA, because PA       >> itself does not currently derive either direction.              Huh?! How does this fool "know" that?              > "currently"? What kind of language is that? PA is what it is, it not       > changing with time !       >       > You could have said that about Fermat's theorem back in the day ... It       > happen[ed] not to be the case.              Right. Actually, there were some speculations of this kind.              But, you see...              --       Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft.       www.avast.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca