Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,679 of 262,912    |
|    Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_G=C3=B6del=27s_G_has_nev    |
|    23 Jan 26 01:15:59    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math, comp.ai.philosophy       From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk              On 23/01/2026 00:29, olcott wrote:       > On 1/22/2026 6:23 PM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:       >> On 20/01/2026 23:08, Tristan Wibberley wrote:       >>> On 18/01/2026 23:41, olcott wrote:       >>>       >>>> I already just said that the proof and refutation of       >>>> Goldbach are outside the scope of PA axioms.       >>>       >>> So Richard is right that you need a truth value for not being covered:       >>>       >>> True(S, Goldbach) = OutOfScope       >>       >>       >> Oh ho! but is Goldbach definable as a shortcode for a statement of the       >> goldbach conjecture in PA? If there's no such statement then it's out of       >> scope without a truth value for that.       >>       >       > Within proof theoretic semantics the lack       > of a finite proof entails ungrounded thus       > non-well-founded. My system works over the       > entire body of knowledge that can be       > expressed in language. Knowledge excludes       > unknowns as outside of its domain.              Because, even if a statement can be expressed, whether it is true or       false is determinable by an axiom extension (among other kinds of       extension). So it cannot be said that all systems must assign some kind       of truth value /including/ that its truth is unknown.              --       Tristan Wibberley              The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except       citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,       of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it       verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to       promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation       of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general       superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train       any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that       will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca