Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,710 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti    |
|    24 Jan 26 11:56:42    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math, sci.math.symbolic       XPost: comp.lang.prolog       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 1/24/2026 11:17 AM, Richard Damon wrote:       > On 1/22/26 7:15 PM, olcott wrote:       >> On 1/22/2026 6:09 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>> On 1/22/26 12:40 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>> Well-founded proof theoretic semantics where True(L, x)       >>>> is anchored in provability from the axioms of formal       >>>> system L seems to eliminate the undecidability that       >>>> model theoretic semantics encounters when truth is       >>>> measured from outside of the formal system in a separate       >>>> model.       >>>       >>> But GOdel's proof wasn't based on a truth outside the system.       >>>       >>> The proof was based outside the system,       >> Hence requiring provability in the system has       >> always been totally wrong-headed.       >>       >       > Nope, when in the system, that is all you know.       >              So you think that inside and outside are the same thing?              --       Copyright 2026 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca