Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,712 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: Well-founded proof theoretic semanti    |
|    24 Jan 26 13:26:59    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math, sci.math.symbolic       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 1/24/2026 1:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       > On 1/24/26 1:20 PM, olcott wrote:       >> On 1/22/2026 11:25 AM, olcott wrote:       >>> Well-founded proof theoretic semantics where       >>> True(L, x) is anchored in provability from       >>> the axioms of formal system L seems to       >>> eliminate the undecidability that model       >>> theoretic semantics encounters when truth is       >>> measured from outside of the formal system in       >>> a separate model.       >>>       >>       >> Gödel’s incompleteness theorem only “works” if       >> one smuggles in an external notion of truth       >> (truth in ℕ) and then pretends it is an       >> internal notion of truth (truth in PA).       >> If we refuse to make that identification,       >> incompleteness evaporates.       >>       >       > Nope.       >       > The existance of non-existance of a number is the same inside and outside.       >              So model theory |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca