Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,839 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: on ignoring the undecidable    |
|    07 Feb 26 10:43:15    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 2/7/2026 10:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:       > On 2/7/26 10:07 AM, olcott wrote:       >> On 2/7/2026 8:42 AM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>> On 2/6/26 11:04 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>> When a truth predicate is given the input:       >>>> "What time is it?"       >>>> and is required to say True or False       >>>> the only correct answer is BAD INPUT       >>>       >>> Nope, as the statement is NOT "True", thus it is false.       >>>       >>> Unless you are asserting that logic doesn't exist in the domain of       >>> the non-contray excluded middle where most logic assumes to live.       >>>       >>       >> Dead obvious Type mismatch error.       >>       >       > And "Type mismatches" are not true statements.       >       > I guess you are admitting that you system isn't "binary", but violates       > the principle of the excluded middle.              When we extend formal systems to include formalized       natural language we often encounter expressions that       are not truth apt.              Conventional logic and math have been paralyzed for       many decades by trying to force-fit semantically       ill-formed expressions into the box of True or False.              --       Copyright 2026 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca