Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,846 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
|    Re: Changing the foundational basis to P    |
|    07 Feb 26 22:59:57    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math, sci.lang       XPost: comp.lang.prolog       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 2/7/2026 8:47 PM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:       > On 07/02/2026 00:10, olcott wrote:       >> When I refer to a formal system I am referring to       >> Russell's atomic facts written down and placed in       >> a simple Type Hierarchy.       >       > Is that, in effect, the conventional meaning of "formal system"? It is       > not normally expressed so, see Curry and Feys.       >              It is the axiomatic foundation of this:       "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"       reliably computable for the entire body of knowledge.              --       Copyright 2026 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca