Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,852 of 262,912    |
|    Tristan Wibberley to Mikko    |
|    Re: on ignoring the undecidable    |
|    09 Feb 26 16:43:33    |
      From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk              On 09/02/2026 14:57, Mikko wrote:       > Logic is not paralyzed. Separating semantics from inference rules       > ensures that semantic problems don't affect the study of proofs       > and provability.              Would you agree that inference rules are a formalisation of some semantics.              a) in a sense       b) yes, properly              ?              And then a syntactical system is one in which there remains no       unformalised semantics (or, indeed, pragmatics), not even identification       of thought objects.              --       Tristan Wibberley              The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except       citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,       of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it       verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to       promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation       of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general       superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train       any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that       will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca