home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.logic      Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa      262,912 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 262,865 of 262,912   
   olcott to All   
   Re: Making the body of knowledge computa   
   11 Feb 26 17:41:58   
   
   XPost: comp.theory, sci.math   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/11/2026 5:30 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:   
   > On 2026-02-11 14:27, olcott wrote:   
   >> On 2/11/2026 2:43 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:   
   >>> On 2026-02-10 21:59, olcott wrote:   
   >>>> We completely replace the foundation of truth conditional   
   >>>> semantics with proof theoretic semantics. Then expressions   
   >>>> are "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"   
   >>>> only to the extent that all their meaning comes from   
   >>>> inferential relations to other expressions of that language.   
   >>>> This is a purely linguistic PTS notion of truth with no   
   >>>> connections outside the inferential system.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Well-founded proof-theoretic semantics reject expressions   
   >>>> lacking a "well-founded justification tree" as meaningless.   
   >>>> ∀x (~Provable(T, x) ⇔ Meaningless(T, x))   
   >>>   
   >>> Proof-theoretic semantics makes no such claim. That's your claim and   
   >>> you should stop attributing it to others.   
   >>>   
   >>> André   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> That is a correct paraphrase of the claims that it   
   >> always does make. Try and show otherwise.   
   >   
   > Not even remotely.   
   >   
   > And the burden of proof is on you to justify your claims. Please quote   
   > someone working on PTS who claims that ∀x (~Provable(T, x) ⇔   
   > Meaningless(T, x))   
   >   
   > André   
   >   
      
   That is fair.   
      
   1.2 Inferentialism, intuitionism, anti-realism   
   Proof-theoretic semantics is inherently inferential,   
   as it is inferential activity which manifests itself   
   in proofs. It thus belongs to inferentialism (a term   
   coined by Brandom, see his 1994; 2000) according to   
   which inferences and the rules of inference establish   
   the meaning of expressions   
      
   https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/proof-theoretic-semantics/#InfeIntuAntiReal   
      
      
   The guy that wrote the article is a major player in the field   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2026 Olcott

              My 28 year goal has been to make
       "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
       reliably computable for the entire body of knowledge.

              This required establishing a new foundation
              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca