Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,865 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to All    |
|    Re: Making the body of knowledge computa    |
|    11 Feb 26 17:41:58    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 2/11/2026 5:30 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:       > On 2026-02-11 14:27, olcott wrote:       >> On 2/11/2026 2:43 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:       >>> On 2026-02-10 21:59, olcott wrote:       >>>> We completely replace the foundation of truth conditional       >>>> semantics with proof theoretic semantics. Then expressions       >>>> are "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"       >>>> only to the extent that all their meaning comes from       >>>> inferential relations to other expressions of that language.       >>>> This is a purely linguistic PTS notion of truth with no       >>>> connections outside the inferential system.       >>>>       >>>> Well-founded proof-theoretic semantics reject expressions       >>>> lacking a "well-founded justification tree" as meaningless.       >>>> ∀x (~Provable(T, x) ⇔ Meaningless(T, x))       >>>       >>> Proof-theoretic semantics makes no such claim. That's your claim and       >>> you should stop attributing it to others.       >>>       >>> André       >>>       >>       >> That is a correct paraphrase of the claims that it       >> always does make. Try and show otherwise.       >       > Not even remotely.       >       > And the burden of proof is on you to justify your claims. Please quote       > someone working on PTS who claims that ∀x (~Provable(T, x) ⇔       > Meaningless(T, x))       >       > André       >              That is fair.              1.2 Inferentialism, intuitionism, anti-realism       Proof-theoretic semantics is inherently inferential,       as it is inferential activity which manifests itself       in proofs. It thus belongs to inferentialism (a term       coined by Brandom, see his 1994; 2000) according to       which inferences and the rules of inference establish       the meaning of expressions              https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/proof-theoretic-semantics/#InfeIntuAntiReal                     The guy that wrote the article is a major player in the field              --       Copyright 2026 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca