Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.logic    |    Logic -- math, philosophy & computationa    |    262,912 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 262,866 of 262,912    |
|    olcott to All    |
|    Making all knowledge expressed in langua    |
|    11 Feb 26 20:17:20    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.math, sci.lang       XPost: comp.ai.philosophy       From: polcott333@gmail.com              We completely replace the foundation of Truth Conditional Semantics with       Proof Theoretic Semantics (PTS). Then expressions are "true on the basis       of meaning expressed in language" only to the extent that all their       meaning comes from inferential relations to other expressions of that       language. This is the purely linguistic PTS notion of truth having no       connections outside the inferential system.              "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language" are elements of the       body of verbal knowledge. This can include basic facts of the actual       world as stipulated axioms of the verbal model of the actual world. This       bridges the divide between the analytic/synthetic distinction.              ∀x (Provable(T, x) ⇔ Meaningful(T, x)) --- (Schroeder-Heister 2024)       ∀x (Provable(x) ⇒ True(x)) --- Anchored in (Prawitz, 2012)               What is the appropriate notion of truth for sentences        whose meanings are understood in epistemic terms such        as proof or ground for an assertion? It seems that the        truth of such sentences has to be identified with the        existence of proofs or grounds...        Prawitz, D. (2012). Truth as an Epistemic Notion. Topoi, 31(1), 9–16        https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-011-9107-6               1.2 Inferentialism, intuitionism, anti-realism        Proof-theoretic semantics is inherently inferential,        as it is inferential activity which manifests itself        in proofs. It thus belongs to inferentialism (a term        coined by Brandom, see his 1994; 2000) according to        which inferences and the rules of inference establish        the meaning of expressions        Schroeder-Heister, Peter, 2024 "Proof-Theoretic Semantics"              https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/proof-theoretic-semantics/#InfeIntuAntiReal              When we understand that linguistic truth (just like       an ordinary dictionary) expressions of language only       get their semantic meaning from other expressions of       language then we directly understand entirely based on       the meaning of words that when no such connection exists       then no semantic meaning is derived.              When we understand this then we can see that       "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"       is reliably computable for the entire body of knowledge       by finite string transformations applied to finite strings.                     --       Copyright 2026 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca