XPost: sci.math   
   From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 14:01:36 -0700, The Starmaker   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 10:22:01 -0700, The Starmaker   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sun, 5 Oct 2025 12:38:09 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>Den 05.10.2025 11:00, skrev Thomas Heger:   
   >>>> Am Samstag000004, 04.10.2025 um 20:39 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:   
   >>>>> Den 02.10.2025 09:52, skrev Thomas Heger:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The universe has actually no time, because time is a LOCAL measure.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Your local time will always point into the future, but only into your   
   >>>>>> LOCAL future!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Other observers in other locations have a local future, too, but that   
   >>>>>> can actually be your past.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> You are on the Earth and I am on the Moon.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Can you give an example where my local future is yor local past?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> (Or vice versa if you prefer.)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Not, because the distance between Moon and Earth is real valued.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you turn the axis of time upside down, this would be an 'imaginary   
   >>>> rotation'.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> This would be a valid timeline, too, but in world, which is made from   
   >>>> anti-matter.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Such an 'anti-world' would be perfectly normal, though only for anti-   
   >>>> beings living there.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> But we couldn't go there, because contact to anti-matter would make us   
   >>>> detonate instantly.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> TH   
   >>>   
   >>>So if my local future were your local past, then the world   
   >>>would explode?   
   >>>   
   >>>Why did you then state:   
   >>>  "Your local time will always point into the future,   
   >>>   but only into your LOCAL future!   
   >>>   Other observers in other locations have a local future,   
   >>>   too, but that can actually be your past."   
   >>>   
   >>>Could it be that your statement was meaningless nonsense?   
   >>   
   >>It's callled 'time dialation'.   
   >>   
   >>But to understand time dialation you have to understand WHEN it   
   >>occurs.   
   >>   
   >>It doesn't occur at the same place, at the same time ...everywhere.   
   >>   
   >>Just as, there is no such thing as a 'theory of everything', because   
   >>everything is NOT...everything.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>Is the Earth the same...everywhere????   
   >>   
   >>where is the pattern? where is the other earth??   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>Everything is not everything.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>You want a theory of everything, remove Earth from the equation.   
   >   
   >   
   >and while you're ad it...remove quantumn mechanics from the equation.   
   >   
   >it's not having nothing to do with what's yous call...everything.   
   >   
   >   
   >In otherwords, there is no theory of everything. it's fudge mechanics.   
   >   
   >   
   >sci.math.fudge   
      
      
   In other words, 'the theory of everything' simply translate to...   
      
   "I think I know everything!"   
      
   "I have the answers to every question!!"   
      
   I know everything!   
      
      
   God forbid if you ever say..."I'm not sure."   
      
      
   You'all tested Positive for Stupid.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)