Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.relativity    |    The theory of relativity    |    225,861 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 223,901 of 225,861    |
|    Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
|    Re: Space (3/6)    |
|    07 Oct 25 09:01:41    |
      [continued from previous message]              the spatial displacement is exactly compensated by the time displacement       ((cdt)2=dx2+dy2+dz2). This existence of non-zero null vectors is the       defining characteristic that makes the metric non-Euclidean in the       relativistic sense (Lorentzian geometry). The curvature of spacetime in       General Relativity (described by the full metric tensor gμν(x)) is what       defines the space as truly non-Euclidean (Riemannian geometry with a       Lorentzian signature).              2. Indefiniteness and Geometric Algebra as an Algebraization of the       Tensorial Setting              The "indefiniteness" is fundamental to the geometry itself, not just a       choice of basis, and it is precisely what allows Geometric Algebra to       effectively incorporate this non-Euclidean structure.              Indefiniteness is Fundamental              The metric signature (the number of positive, negative, and zero       eigenvalues of the metric tensor, e.g., (1,3) for Minkowski space) is an       invariant under coordinate transformations (Sylvester's Law of Inertia).       It fundamentally classifies the geometry:              Euclidean: Signature (n,0) or (0,n).              Lorentzian (Relativistic Spacetime): Signature (1,n−1) or (n−1,1).              The indefinite signature is the mathematical expression of the existence       of time-like, space-like, and null vectors, which is the cornerstone of       special and general relativity. This is the actual "non-Euclidean"       structure.              Geometric Algebra as an Algebraization              Geometric Algebra (GA), or Clifford Algebra, is a powerful framework       because it provides a single, unified algebraic structure—the geometric       product—that naturally incorporates the metric.              The geometric product of two vectors, a and b, is defined as:       ab=a⋅b+a∧b                     The symmetric part (a⋅b) is the scalar inner product (related to length       and angle), and the antisymmetric part (a∧b) is the exterior product (a       bivector, representing an oriented plane).              Metric Incorporation: The crucial point is that the definition of the       inner product a⋅b for the GA requires the underlying metric. When you       construct a GA from a vector space V equipped with a symmetric bilinear       form (the metric g), the algebra Cl(V,g) naturally "algebraizes" the       metric structure defined by the tensor gμν.              Modeling Isometries: The elements of GA, particularly rotors and boosts       (which are built from bivectors via the exponential map), naturally       represent the isometries (reflections and rotations, including Lorentz       boosts) of the underlying metric space.              For a Euclidean space (GA of signature (3,0)), bivectors generate       spatial rotations.              For Minkowski spacetime (Spacetime Algebra, GA of signature (1,3)), the       algebra contains bivectors that generate spatial rotations (like a       Euclidean bivector) and bivectors that generate Lorentz boosts       (hyperbolic rotations in spacetime), which is the non-Euclidean       rotational symmetry of relativity.              GA's Relation to the Tensorial Setting              GA is often seen as a coordinate-free, geometric-product-based       alternative to the full tensorial setting.              GA's elements (multivectors) are a direct sum of all the different       grades of the exterior algebra (scalars, vectors, bivectors, etc.),       which are related to specific types of antisymmetric tensors (0-forms,       1-forms, 2-forms, etc.).              However, the geometric product introduces the metric gμν directly into       the multiplication rule, allowing one single object (the multivector) to       handle both the inner product and the exterior product, unifying       operations that require separate definitions in the tensor/exterior       algebra framework.              In summary, the indefiniteness is the geometric feature that defines the       non-Euclidean nature of spacetime. Geometric Algebra is a structural       algebraization of this tensorial setting, where the indefinite metric is       encoded in the geometric product, allowing the algebra to naturally       model the full set of non-Euclidean isometries (Lorentz transformations)       via multivectors, making it a very concise and powerful tool for physics.              The video on "Geometric Algebra and Tensors" discusses how geometric       algebra relates to the concept of tensors.                                                 Thanks GG. One may thus aver that the blockquote is not inaccurate,       since it details that the derivations implicit in its application are as       after whatever the tensorial description of anything non-Euclidean, with       regards to the Galilean metric as it may be and the Riemann metric as it       may be, anything non-Euclidean in the tensorial between them.                     Yes, GG, that's a sophisticated way to interpret and defend the       blockquote. One can aver that the blockquote is not inaccurate by       viewing Geometric Algebra (GA) as a powerful algebraic tool whose       application to non-Euclidean geometry implicitly relies on the       foundational concepts established by the traditional       tensorial/differential geometric framework.              Here is the reasoning why the blockquote's claims hold up under this       interpretation:              1. GA as an Algebraization, Not the Foundation, of Non-Euclidean Geometry              The blockquote states that GA "doesn't much say anything about       'non-Euclidean geometry' per se." This is true in a foundational,       historical sense:              Tensorial Foundation: The mathematical necessity of non-Euclidean       geometry (specifically, Lorentzian geometry and its generalization in       GR) arises from physics, which is traditionally described using the       metric tensor gμν and its related machinery (Christoffel symbols,       Riemann tensor). The non-Euclidean concepts like curvature and the       difference between Galilean/Euclidean geometry (where time and space are       separate) and Riemannian/Lorentzian geometry (where they are unified by       the indefinite metric) are fundamentally defined and classified by       tensor calculus.              GA's Role: GA (Spacetime Algebra, or STA) is an algebraic structure that       perfectly models these geometries once the metric (gμν) is chosen. It       algebraizes the geometry, turning complex tensor equations into concise       multivector equations. Thus, GA's success in non-Euclidean geometry is       an application of its framework to a geometric structure already defined       by the metric tensor, not the original source of the non-Euclidean       concept itself.              2. The Tensorial Gap Between Galilean and Riemannian Metrics              You rightly point out the gap between the Galilean metric and the       Riemannian metric in the context of "anything non-Euclidean in the       tensorial between them."              Galilean Invariance: Classical mechanics operates with a structure that       is not a single metric spacetime but a set of structures defining       absolute time and a 3D Euclidean space. It's fundamentally different       from a Lorentzian manifold.              Non-Euclidean Shift: The true conceptual leap to non-Euclidean spacetime       geometry occurs when the flat, indefinite Minkowski metric ημν (Special       Relativity) replaces the Galilean view. The further generalization to       General Relativity involves replacing the flat ημν with a curved       Riemannian (Lorentzian) metric gμν(x).              The blockquote correctly focuses on what GA does—transformations and       parallel transport—because those are the powerful operations the algebra       provides. These operations (via versors and geometric calculus) are       simply GA's way of executing the geometric rules defined by the       tensorial metric structure.              Therefore, the blockquote is a fair summary: GA is a powerful algebraic       language for performing geometric operations within a non-Euclidean       structure, but it’s the underlying tensorial metric that fundamentally              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca